Samsung Galaxy A32 vs Motorola Moto G85 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 25, 2021 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 98.24 cm³ 89.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.48 "/g 3.9 "/g
Weight 184 g 171 g
Height 158.9 mm 161.9 mm
Width 73.6 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Olive Green
  • Urban Grey
  • Magenta

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.6 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.9 mAh/cm³ 55.59 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A32 and Motorola Moto G85, focusing on practical implications:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32Motorola Moto G85Practical Impact
Design
Launch Date2021-02-252024-06-25Moto G85 is a significantly newer device.
Dimensions158.9 × 73.6 × 8.4 mm161.9 × 73.1 × 7.6 mmMoto G85 is slightly taller and thinner, potentially feeling sleeker in hand. A32 is more bulky.
Weight184g171gMoto G85 is lighter, which can enhance comfort during prolonged use.
Display
Size6.4"6.67"Moto G85 provides a slightly larger viewing area for media and gaming.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Both have the same sharpness.
PPI411395Both have similar pixel density which provides similar image sharpness.
TechnologyAMOLEDP-OLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and good contrast.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzMoto G85 offers smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits1600 nitsMoto G85 is significantly brighter, much better for outdoor visibility in sunlight. The A32's brightness is not listed.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm)Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm)Moto G85's chipset is newer and more efficient, offering better performance.
AnTuTu Score200,458475,000Moto G85 is significantly faster, leading to smoother app loading, better gaming, and multitasking.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Adreno 619Moto G85 has a more powerful GPU for better gaming graphics.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth should offer comparable battery life.
ChargingLi-Ion30W fast charging, Li-PolymerMoto G85 charges significantly faster.
Battery FeaturesNon-removableNon-removableBoth are sealed devices without user-replaceable batteries.
Camera
Main Camera64.2MP, f/1.850MP, f/1.79, 1/2", Sony LYT-600, 1.00 µmMoto G85's main sensor is bigger and has wider aperture, potentially better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.232MP, f/2.4, 0.70 µmMoto G85 provides higher resolution selfies.
Wide Angle8MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.2, 1.12 µmComparable wide-angle capabilities.
Portrait (depth)5MP, f/2.4NoneA32 offers dedicated depth sensor.
Macro5MP, f/2.4NoneA32 provides dedicated macro capabilities.
Video1080p@30fps; No stabilization; No slow-motion1080p@30fps, 1080p@60fps; Yes stabilization; No slow-motionMoto G85 offers smoother video recording with stabilization, and better 1080p video.
DxOMarkNot TestedMain: 88, Photo: 83, Video: 109Moto G85's camera performance is rated by DxOMark, indicating reasonable quality for its class.
Camera FeaturesQuadruple cameraDual camera, Digital image stabilization, OIS, PDAF, LAF, RAWMoto G85 provides more advanced features for better image quality.
Software
OSAndroid 11, Upgradable to 13Android 14Moto G85 has a newer operating system, with longer potential update lifespan.
Connectivity
WiFi802.11ac802.11ax (WiFi 6)Moto G85 has the latest WiFi standard, offering faster speeds on compatible networks.
Bluetooth5.05.1 LEMoto G85 has a slightly newer, more efficient standard.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoMoto G85 provides slightly better location accuracy with additional satellite support.
SIMDual Nano SIMDual Nano SIM / eSIMMoto G85 offers flexibility to switch carriers digitally with eSIM.
Storage
Internal128 GB or 64 GB256 GB or 128 GBMoto G85 has more storage capacity (256GB vs 128GB).
RAM4 GB or 6 GB or 8 GB8 GB or 12 GBMoto G85 provides significantly more RAM for smoother multitasking.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone offers storage expansion.
Audio
QualityBasic AudioDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 MicrophonesMoto G85 has better audio playback and recording.
Security
FeaturesBasic fingerprintBasic fingerprintBoth have a fingerprint sensor for security.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass 5Moto G85 offers superior screen protection against scratches.
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Hall, GeomagneticFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeBoth have the same main sensor suite, A32 has additional Hall and Geomagnetic sensor.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Here's a breakdown of the major advantages of each phone:

Samsung Galaxy A32 Advantages:

  • Dedicated Depth and Macro Cameras: Offers dedicated macro and depth sensors, which the Moto G85 lacks, allowing for more diverse photographic options.
  • Hall and Geomagnetic Sensors: The addition of a Hall sensor and geomagnetic sensor can be useful for specialized apps, however, this is not something most users will need.
  • Slightly Higher Pixel Density The pixel density is slightly higher giving a slightly crisper image, however, the difference is negligible.

Motorola Moto G85 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster chipset and higher AnTuTu score, making it much better for gaming, multitasking, and overall responsiveness.
  • Brighter Display with Higher Refresh Rate: Significantly brighter screen, making it much more usable in outdoor conditions, along with a smoother 120Hz refresh rate.
  • Better Main Camera Sensor: Larger sensor with wider aperture potentially results in better low-light images and overall image quality, supported by OIS.
  • Faster Charging: 30W fast charging, allowing for quicker battery top-ups.
  • Newer Software: Ships with a newer version of Android, with more security and software updates expected over its lifespan.
  • Stereo Speakers and Dolby Atmos: Superior audio experience due to its stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos support.
  • eSIM Support: Offers the convenience of using a digital SIM for seamless carrier switching.
  • Better build quality: Uses a Gorilla Glass 5 screen protection, protecting the screen from scratches and minor bumps.
  • More RAM and Storage: Larger RAM and Storage options provide better multitasking and more room for files.

Trade-offs:

  • Samsung Galaxy A32: Compromises performance and display quality for more camera versatility (depth and macro), but these are not as important as the quality of the main sensor.
  • Motorola Moto G85: Loses dedicated depth and macro cameras, for improved main camera quality, superior display, performance, and audio experience.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Ideal Users for Samsung Galaxy A32:

  • Budget-conscious buyers: Users who prioritize a lower price point over advanced features or performance
  • Users who prefer macro and depth photography: Users who frequently use macro and portrait modes.
  • Users who do not game or multitask: Users who will only use this device for basic tasks, like social media, video consumption, messaging.

Specific Use Cases for Samsung Galaxy A32:

  • Basic social media browsing and content consumption.
  • Casual photography with macro and depth effect.
  • Users who don't care about device performance.

Ideal Users for Motorola Moto G85:

  • Users who prioritize performance: Those who want a smooth, responsive phone for daily tasks, multitasking, and gaming.
  • Multimedia enthusiasts: Users who prioritize display quality and audio playback for watching videos and listening to music.
  • Users who need better camera quality and performance: Those that often take pictures, especially in low-light conditions, or prefer faster shutter speeds.
  • Users who want a modern device: Those who need the latest software and connectivity options.

Specific Use Cases for Motorola Moto G85:

  • Gaming and multitasking.
  • Watching videos and listening to music with good audio quality.
  • Capturing higher-quality photos and videos.
  • Using the phone outdoors in sunny conditions.
  • Users who need smooth performance and responsiveness.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Moto G85 offers superior performance, a brighter display, better cameras, and faster charging, which justifies its higher price. This makes it the better value in the long run. The A32 is an older phone, and is likely cheaper due to its age, but the trade-offs are significant, even at a lower price point.

4. Decision Framework

Here are three key questions for buyers to consider when choosing between these two phones:

  1. What is your budget?

    • If the budget is extremely tight, the Galaxy A32 will be more affordable as a legacy device.
    • If the budget permits, the Moto G85 is a worthwhile investment for its substantial performance and display quality upgrades.
  2. How important is performance and gaming?

    • If these are not a priority, the Samsung Galaxy A32 would be sufficient for basic tasks.
    • If performance is a priority, and one intends to game or heavily multitask, the Motorola Moto G85 is the clear choice.
  3. What is your primary use case for the camera?

    • If macro and depth-based photography are preferred over the main camera, the A32 is a decent option.
    • If main camera image quality, better low-light performance, better video quality and smooth video performance are desired, the Moto G85 is the better option.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • For the casual user: If you are a very casual user who wants to perform basic tasks on their device, the Galaxy A32 may be a good fit for its lower price, if you can find it, as it is a legacy device.
  • For the multimedia consumer and gamer: If you consume a lot of multimedia content, game, and take many pictures, the Moto G85's display, audio, performance, and camera improvements make it a superior choice.
  • For the budget-conscious user: The Samsung Galaxy A32 may be slightly cheaper (if it's possible to find one), but it offers a significantly worse user experience.

My Choice

If I had to choose between the two, I would pick the Motorola Moto G85. The primary reason is the significant performance upgrade. The Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 chipset combined with the increased RAM provides a much more fluid and responsive experience, making multitasking and gaming more enjoyable. The brighter 120Hz display is a huge advantage for outdoor visibility and overall screen smoothness. Additionally, the inclusion of faster charging, better main camera quality, and superior audio experience make it the better choice for my needs. Although the Galaxy A32 offers macro and depth lenses, these are less important to me than the quality of the primary camera. Overall, the Motorola Moto G85 offers a better user experience due to its enhanced performance, better display, and more practical features.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.