Samsung Galaxy A32 vs Motorola Moto G73 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 25, 2021 January 24, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 98.24 cm³ 98.86 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.48 "/g 3.59 "/g
Weight 184 g 181 g
Height 158.9 mm 161.4 mm
Width 73.6 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Midnight Blue
  • Lucent White

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.6 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.9 mAh/cm³ 50.57 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32Motorola Moto G73Practical Impact
Dimensions158.9 × 73.6 × 8.4 mm161.4 × 73.8 × 8.3 mmThe Moto G73 is slightly taller (2.5mm) and negligibly thinner (-0.1mm), and negligibly wider (0.2mm). It will feel very similar in the hand.
Weight184g181gBoth phones are very similar in weight, making them comfortable to hold for extended periods.
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedNo information provided on materials or specific build quality advantages

Display

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32Motorola Moto G73Practical Impact
Size6.4"6.5"Negligible size difference of 0.1 inch; practically similar viewing area.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Both offer a sharp, full HD viewing experience, ideal for general use and media.
Pixel Density411 PPI405 PPISimilar pixel density means both screens will look equally sharp to the naked eye.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDAMOLED on the A32 offers deeper blacks, higher contrast, and more vibrant colors, making it better for media consumption and use in bright conditions, with better power efficiency for dark interfaces. IPS LCD will have more natural colors, albeit more muted and less contrast
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzMoto G73 has a smoother scrolling experience and faster animations.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth phones have the same peak brightness, the practical visibility in bright sunlit enviroments is unknown.

Performance

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32Motorola Moto G73Practical Impact
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80 (12nm)Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6nm)The Dimensity 930 is significantly more powerful, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score200,458497,466The Moto G73 has a massively higher benchmark score, indicating vastly superior overall performance.
GPUMali-G52 MC2IMG BXM-8-256The Moto G73 will offer significantly improved graphics performance, better for gaming and graphic intensive applications.

Camera

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32Motorola Moto G73Practical Impact
Main Camera64.2MP, f/1.850MP, f/1.8The A32 has a higher resolution main camera, potentially capturing more detail in good lighting, but with higher pixel count, but the main camera in the Motorola has a larger individual pixel size, and so may perform better in low light.
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.216MP, f/2.4The A32 has higher resolution and a slightly wider aperture, resulting in potentially better selfies, especially in low light, however individual pixel size is unknown.
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.2Both offer comparable wide-angle photography experience, although the individual pixel size on the G73 is larger.
Portrait Mode5MP, f/2.4 (depth)NoneThe A32 provides dedicated depth sensing for portrait mode effects, and has a dedicated macro lens. The Moto G73 is missing this.
Macro Lens5MP, f/2.4NoneThe A32 has a dedicated macro lens for closeup photography; Moto G73 is missing this.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fpsThe Moto G73 offers 60fps recording, allowing for smoother video, as well as 240fps slow motion.
Camera FeaturesQuad cameraDual Camera, Digital Image Stabilization, Ultra Stable VideoThe A32 has more lenses, while the G73 includes a 4K video and better video stabilization.

Battery

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32Motorola Moto G73Practical Impact
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth offer similar battery life, depending on user habits.
ChargingLi-Ion, Unspecified30W fast charging, Li-PolymerThe Moto G73 supports 30W fast charging, allowing significantly faster charging times.
RemovableNon-removableNon-removableNeither phone's battery can be replaced by the user.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A32 Advantages

  • Superior Display Technology: AMOLED screen offers deeper blacks, better contrast, and more vibrant colors compared to the IPS LCD of the Moto G73, which is generally more visually appealing.
  • Dedicated Depth & Macro Lenses: Includes dedicated depth and macro lenses for more versatile photography.
  • Higher Resolution Front Facing Camera: Can produce better quality selfies, especially in low light conditions.
  • Gyroscope sensor: Useful for advanced features and gaming.

Motorola Moto G73 Advantages

  • Significantly Better Performance: The Dimensity 930 chipset is substantially more powerful than the Helio G80, resulting in a much smoother user experience, better for multitasking, and suitable for gaming.
  • Higher Refresh Rate: 120Hz refresh rate makes scrolling and animations feel smoother than the A32's 90Hz display.
  • Faster Charging: 30W fast charging significantly reduces charging times compared to the A32, whose charging specifications are not specified.
  • Better Video Recording: Offers 60fps video recording, for smoother capture and playback, as well as 240fps slow motion video.
  • Newer Bluetooth: Supports a newer version of Bluetooth (5.3) than the A32.
  • Newer Wi-Fi: Supports a newer version of Wi-Fi (WiFi 6) than the A32.
  • Better Audio Features: Dolby Atmos, stereo speakers, and dual microphones offer better audio quality and clarity than the basic audio features of the Samsung A32.
  • Newer OS: Ships with a newer version of Android (13).

Practical Implications and Trade-offs

  • The A32 trades processing power for a higher quality display and more versatile camera setup.
  • The Moto G73 prioritizes raw performance and a smoother experience over the visual quality of the screen.
  • Users who value display quality and camera versatility might prefer the A32.
  • Users who prioritize performance, smoother visuals, audio, and fast charging will likely prefer the Moto G73.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A32 Ideal Users

  • Casual Media Consumers: Users who watch a lot of videos and want a vibrant, high-contrast display.
  • Social Media Photographers: Users who want versatile camera options, including portrait mode and macro shots, and a high resolution front facing camera for selfies.
  • General Users: Individuals who are not heavily into gaming or demanding applications, and value display quality more than raw speed.

  • Use Cases:

    • Enjoying movies and videos on the go.
    • Capturing everyday photos and sharing them on social media.
    • Browsing the web and using social media applications with a visually pleasing display.

Motorola Moto G73 Ideal Users

  • Power Users: Users who need smooth, fast performance for multitasking and demanding applications.
  • Gamers: Users who want a smooth gaming experience on a budget phone.
  • Multimedia Users: Those that want a more immersive sound experience, and better recording capabilities, as well as faster charging and smoother animations.
  • Future Proofers: Users who want the newest standards, such as Wi-Fi 6, and the newest version of Bluetooth (5.3)

  • Use Cases:

    • Playing graphically intensive mobile games.
    • Running multiple apps simultaneously without lag.
    • Taking video and enjoying immersive content with quality audio
    • Using Wi-Fi and Bluetooth to its full potential.

Price-to-Value Ratio

  • The Moto G73 generally offers better value in terms of performance for a similar price, particularly in light of its fast charging. The A32 could be considered to be of better value if its camera and display were of more significance.
  • The decision will depend on individual priorities between screen quality and power.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers

  1. What is my primary use case? (Gaming, media consumption, photography, general use)
  2. How much does display quality matter to me compared to raw performance? (AMOLED vs IPS, smooth vs fast).
  3. Do I prioritize a better camera system, or better video recording capabilities? (More lenses vs higher framerates, and stability)

Scenario-Based Recommendations

  • Scenario 1: Casual User/Media Consumer:

    • Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A32 is likely better for users that watch more videos, or prefer the higher contrast and vibrancy of an AMOLED screen.
  • Scenario 2: Mobile Gamer/Power User:

    • Recommendation: Motorola Moto G73 is the better option, with significantly better performance.
  • Scenario 3: Photography Enthusiast:

    • Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A32 is likely the better option, if more camera lenses and dedicated portrait and macro modes are of significance.
  • Scenario 4: General User:

    • Recommendation: Motorola Moto G73 would be the better option, with significantly better day to day performance, and a smoother user experience due to its 120Hz refresh rate.

My Choice

Based on my analysis, I would choose the Motorola Moto G73. While the Samsung A32 boasts a superior AMOLED display and more versatile camera lenses, the sheer performance difference between the two phones is too significant to ignore. The Moto G73's Dimensity 930 chipset will result in a snappier, more responsive experience across all tasks, from simple browsing to more demanding gaming and multitasking. Additionally, the smoother 120Hz refresh rate, faster charging, and better audio support further improve the overall user experience. While the AMOLED screen of the A32 is enticing, the G73 offers a more well-rounded package in terms of speed, fluidity, and practicality for day to day use. The better video recording capabilities are also a significant benefit for me personally. While the A32's camera might be slightly more versatile due to the additional lenses, the significantly better performance of the G73 makes it my choice.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.