Samsung Galaxy A32 vs Motorola Moto G52 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 25, 2021 April 20, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 98.24 cm³ 95.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.48 "/g 3.91 "/g
Weight 184 g 169 g
Height 158.9 mm 160.1 mm
Width 73.6 mm 74.5 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Charcoal Gray
  • Porcelain White

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.6 % 88.2 %
Pixel Density 411 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.9 mAh/cm³ 52.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32Motorola Moto G52Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions158.9 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm160.1 x 74.5 x 8 mmMoto G52 is slightly taller and thinner, A32 is slightly thicker and narrower
Weight184g169gMoto G52 is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for longer use.
Display
Size6.4"6.6"Moto G52 offers a slightly larger viewing area for media consumption and gaming.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Both have the same sharpness, meaning similar detail in images and text.
PPI411402Similar pixel density, no noticeable difference in sharpness in practical use.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and high contrast compared to LCD screens.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzSmooth scrolling and animations on both phones, making the user experience feel more fluid.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsPeak brightness is unknown; both phones appear to have same brightness
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80 (12 nm)Snapdragon 680 (6 nm)Snapdragon 680 is more power-efficient and generally offers slightly better performance; Newer manufacturing process of Moto G52 may lead to better battery life
AnTuTu Score200,458216,000Moto G52 has a slight edge in performance, which may be noticeable in demanding apps and games.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Adreno 610Moto G52's Adreno 610 is more efficient, but both provide adequate performance for gaming.
Camera
Main Camera64.2MP f/1.850MP f/1.8 (1/2.76", 0.64µm)A32 has higher resolution; Moto G52 has larger pixels and sensor, could mean better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera20MP f/2.216MP f/2.45 (1.00µm)A32 has higher resolution and wider aperture; Moto G52 has larger pixels which could mean better low-light performance
Wide Angle Lens8MP f/2.28MP f/2.2Similar wide angle camera performance.
Depth Sensor5MP f/2.4NoneA32 has dedicated depth sensor for portrait photos.
Macro Lens5MP f/2.42MP f/2.4A32 has higher resolution for macro photography.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth record similar quality video; Moto G52 offers 4k video recording.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth offer similar battery life.
ChargingLi-Ion30W Fast Charging, Li-IonMoto G52 charges much faster.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 13)Android 12Moto G52 has a newer version out of box, but A32 can be upgraded to a similar version.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11ac, Dual-band802.11acA32 has better Wi-Fi with the addition of Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display features.
Bluetooth5.0, various profiles5.0 LE, APT-xMoto G52 supports Bluetooth LE and APT-x for better battery and audio.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, GalileoA32 supports more satellite systems, but both offer accurate location services.
Storage
Internal Storage64GB/128GB64GB/128GB/256GBMoto G52 offers a 256GB option for users with higher storage needs.
RAM4GB/6GB/8GB4GB/6GBA32 offers a higher RAM option (8GB) for better multitasking.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone supports microSD card.
Audio
AudioBasic audio featuresDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphonesMoto G52 offers a better audio experience for media consumption.
Security
Securitybasic fingerprint sensorside-mounted fingerprint sensorMoto G52 has a more convenient and modern fingerprint sensor.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass 5Moto G52 has superior screen protection
SensorsBiometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Hall, GeomagneticBiometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeA32 has more advanced sensor suite

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A32 Advantages:

  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: 64MP main camera offers more detail in good lighting conditions.
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: 20MP front camera potentially captures more detailed selfies.
  • Dedicated Depth Sensor: Offers better portrait mode photos.
  • Higher RAM Option: 8GB option provides better multitasking and gaming capabilities.
  • More GPS satellites: Offers more accurate location services.
  • More sensors: Offers more advanced functionality.

Practical Implications: The A32 excels in photography, especially in well-lit environments and portrait photography, also has better support for multitasking.

Motorola Moto G52 Advantages:

  • Lighter and Thinner Design: More comfortable for extended periods and easier to carry.
  • Newer, More Efficient Chipset: Snapdragon 680 offers better battery efficiency and overall performance.
  • Larger Pixels: The Moto G52 has larger pixel sizes on the main and selfie cameras, which can mean better low light photos.
  • Faster Charging: 30W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • Stereo Speakers with Dolby Atmos: Enhanced audio experience for music, videos, and games.
  • 256GB Storage Option: Provides more storage for users with large libraries of files and media.
  • Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor: More convenient and modern placement.
  • Better screen protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 is more resistant to scratches and damage.

Practical Implications: The Moto G52 is geared towards media consumption with its better audio, is more convenient with better charging and design, and offers good performance.

Trade-offs:

  • A32: Sacrifices a modern design, fast charging and better audio quality for slightly better camera detail and more sensors.
  • Moto G52: Trades some camera resolution and a depth sensor for better performance, battery efficiency, sound quality, and screen protection.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A32 Ideal Users:

  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize high-resolution photography for social media and print.
  • Multi-taskers: Those who need more RAM for smooth transitions between multiple apps.
  • Users who want a better sensor suite.
  • Users who prioritize higher resolution front camera for more detailed selfies.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Taking detailed photos in well-lit environments.
  • Creating portrait photos with a dedicated depth sensor.
  • Running multiple apps without lag.
  • Gaming.

Motorola Moto G52 Ideal Users:

  • Media Consumers: Those who enjoy watching videos and listening to music on their phone.
  • Users who prioritize battery life and quick charging.
  • Users who prefer a more ergonomic and lightweight design.
  • Users who prefer a convenient side mounted fingerprint sensor.
  • Users who are more prone to damage the screen and need better protection.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Watching videos and movies with enhanced sound quality.
  • Listening to music and podcasts with stereo speakers.
  • Daily use for calls, social media, and browsing with better battery life.
  • Gaming.
  • Frequent travelers who need fast charging.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • Both phones are mid-range devices and offer good value. The Moto G52 arguably offers more for its price due to its fast charging and better audio.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Do you prioritize camera resolution and portrait mode or overall battery life and audio quality?
  2. How important is the design, fast charging, and screen protection for you?
  3. Do you need more than 128 GB of storage and is stereo sound important to you?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Photography is a top priority: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A32 for its higher resolution main camera, better selfie camera, and depth sensor, assuming the photos are usually taken in well lit environments.
  • Scenario 2: Media Consumption and Battery Life are key: Choose the Motorola Moto G52 for its better audio quality, fast charging, and lightweight design.
  • Scenario 3: Balanced performance and more storage needed: Choose the Motorola Moto G52 for its Snapdragon 680 chipset, better audio, faster charging, and 256 GB storage option.

My Choice

I would choose the Motorola Moto G52. Here's why:

While the Samsung Galaxy A32 offers a good camera, the Moto G52 provides a better overall user experience for my daily needs. I value the lighter design, which is more comfortable for extended use. The fast charging is a huge plus, especially when I'm on the go. The Snapdragon 680 chipset is more efficient and offers sufficient performance for my daily use. Additionally, the enhanced audio with stereo speakers and Dolby Atmos is far more important than a slightly higher resolution main camera and the side mounted fingerprint sensor is more practical. Lastly the better screen protection means the device is more resistant to damage. While I do appreciate the higher RAM option on the A32, the Moto G52 strikes a better balance between performance, battery, and overall user experience, making it the preferred choice for my use case.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.