Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Xiaomi Poco F3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 22, 2021 March 27, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 113.71 cm³ 97.55 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.4 "/g
Weight 205 g 196 g
Height 164.2 mm 163.7 mm
Width 76.1 mm 76.4 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Arctic White
  • Night Black
  • Deep Ocean Blue
  • Moonlight Silver

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 85.9 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 101.60 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.97 mAh/cm³ 46.33 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4520 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)
GPU Mali-G57 MC3 Adreno 650

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 13 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GXiaomi Poco F3Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions164.2 × 76.1 × 9.1 mm163.7 × 76.4 × 7.8 mmPoco F3 is slightly thinner and feels more compact, A32 5G is slightly thicker and may feel more bulky in hand.
Weight205g196gPoco F3 is negligibly lighter; may be noticeable during extended use.
Display
Size6.5"6.67"Poco F3 offers a slightly larger viewing area for content consumption and gaming.
Resolution720x16001080x2400Poco F3 displays significantly sharper images and text, leading to a much clearer and more detailed viewing experience, A32 5G can appear blurry for reading and viewing high-res content.
Pixel Density (PPI)270395Poco F3 has a much sharper display, resulting in better image quality and clarity.
TechnologyTFT LCDAMOLEDPoco F3 delivers richer colors, deeper blacks, and superior contrast, especially beneficial for watching videos and gaming. A32 5G will appear washed out in comparison.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzPoco F3 provides noticeably smoother scrolling, animations, and gaming experiences, A32 5G can feel choppy and slow.
Brightness0 nits1300 nitsPoco F3 is vastly superior for outdoor visibility, allowing usage in bright sunlight, A32 5G is likely unusable outdoors in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 (7 nm)Poco F3 provides much faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and significantly better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score249,720800,216Poco F3 is substantially more powerful, handling demanding tasks and games more efficiently, A32 5G can be slow in heavy usage.
GPUMali-G57 MC3Adreno 650Poco F3 provides higher graphical performance, leading to smoother and more detailed gaming experiences, A32 5G will suffer in graphically intense applications
Camera
Main Camera Resolution48MP48MPBoth offer similar main camera resolution; Image quality will vary based on other factors.
Main Camera Aperturef/1.8f/1.79Poco F3's slightly wider aperture might provide better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera Resolution13MP20MPPoco F3 provides higher resolution selfies with more details, A32 5G is lower resolution.
Selfie Camera Aperturef/2.2f/2.45A32 5G's wider aperture may lead to slightly better low-light selfies.
Wide-Angle Lens8MPNot availableA32 5G has an additional ultra-wide lens for capturing broader scenes.
Macro/Depth Cameras5MP/2MPNot AvailableA32 5G has dedicated cameras for macro and depth effects for more versatile photography, Poco F3 relies on software for depth.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fpsUp to 4K@30fpsBoth record similar 4K video quality but the Poco F3 features EIS for smoother video and more slow-motion modes.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh4520mAhA32 5G has a slightly larger battery, potentially offering slightly longer battery life, however this depends on other usage factors.
Charging15W33WPoco F3 charges much faster, reducing downtime for users, A32 5G charges slowly.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (up to 13)Android 11 (up to 13)Both offer similar Android functionality
Storage
Internal Storage64GB/128GB128GB/256GBPoco F3 provides more internal storage options, while A32 5G offers a lower 64GB entry point.
RAM4GB/6GB/8GB6GB/8GBPoco F3 offers 6GB and 8GB variants suitable for smooth multitasking and gaming, A32 5G offers a 4GB option that will struggle with multitasking.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone allows for expandable storage, consider the onboard memory carefully.
Audio
Audio QualityDolby Atmos, Dolby Digital PlusDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersPoco F3 offers enhanced audio features with Hi-Res Audio and Stereo Speakers for improved listening and immersive media consumption, A32 5G offers only Dolby Atmos/Digital Plus.
Security
Biometric SecuritySide-mounted fingerprintSide-mounted fingerprintBoth phones offer secure access with a side-mounted fingerprint scanner.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass 5Poco F3's screen is more resistant to scratches and damage, which makes it more durable.
Sensors
Sensor SuiteFingerprint, Accelerometer, ProximityFingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic proximityPoco F3 offers a more comprehensive suite of sensors suitable for advanced functionality, gaming, and navigation.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco F3 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED screen with 120Hz refresh rate offers a much better visual experience with vibrant colors, smoother scrolling, and better outdoor visibility.
  • Significantly Higher Performance: The Snapdragon 870 chipset delivers significantly better performance for gaming, multitasking, and overall app responsiveness.
  • Faster Charging: 33W fast charging allows for quick battery top-ups.
  • Better Audio: Hi-Res Audio and stereo speakers provide a superior audio experience.
  • More Storage Options: Up to 256GB internal storage (vs A32 5G's 128GB maximum).
  • Better Build Quality: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 provides superior screen protection.
  • More Advanced Sensor Suite: Includes gyroscope and compass, ideal for gaming and more advanced navigation, as well as ultrasonic proximity sensor.

    • Practical Implications: The Poco F3 is faster, offers a better display and audio experience, and recharges more quickly making it better for media consumption, gaming and general usage.

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Advantages:

  • Slightly Larger Battery: 5000 mAh battery may offer slightly better battery life depending on other components and usage.
  • More versatile camera system Includes a wide-angle lens, a macro lens, and a depth sensor, enhancing flexibility in photography.
  • Lower entry-level storage option: The 64GB variant may be appealing to those who need less storage at a lower cost.
  • Wider Aperture on Selfie Lens: May lead to better low-light selfies.
  • Wider Aperture on Main Camera: May offer slightly better low-light performance.
  • Dolby Digital Plus: Enhanced audio quality (while Poco F3 has Hi-Res Audio, the difference is subjective)

    • Practical Implications: The A32 5G has a more versatile camera system at the expense of overall performance and visual fidelity, while also offering a large battery and the option for a lower price entry-level version.

Trade-offs:

  • Poco F3: Sacrifices a dedicated wide-angle lens, macro and depth sensors for better overall performance and quality
  • Samsung Galaxy A32 5G: Trades overall performance, display quality, and faster charging for slightly more battery life and a versatile camera system, also features a more limited entry-level storage option.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Ideal User for Xiaomi Poco F3:

  • Gamers: The superior performance and 120Hz AMOLED display make it excellent for mobile gaming.
  • Media Consumers: Those who frequently watch videos or stream content will appreciate the vibrant display, stereo speakers, and Hi-Res Audio.
  • Power Users: Those who need smooth multitasking and fast app loading will benefit from the Snapdragon 870 chipset.
  • Users that want high screen brightness: Those who often use their phones in direct sunlight, will find the high screen brightness very valuable.
  • Users that value quick charging: Those who need to frequently top up their phone.

    • Use Cases: Gaming, watching movies/TV shows, intensive multitasking, and outdoor use.

Ideal User for Samsung Galaxy A32 5G:

  • Casual Photographers: Users who want a versatile camera system for different types of photography but do not require the best quality will benefit from the additional lenses.
  • Users who prioritize battery life: For those that want longer uptime from their phone, A32 5G is the way to go.
  • Budget-Conscious Consumers: The lower-end 64GB variant may be more affordable.

    • Use Cases: Taking a variety of photos in different scenarios, extended daily use without frequent charging, basic smartphone usage.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Poco F3 offers a much higher performance and display experience for the price, making it a high value proposition.
  • The Galaxy A32 5G offers basic smartphone functionality and additional cameras at the expense of overall performance and display quality.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is overall performance for you? If you are a heavy user and gamer, the Poco F3 is a better choice.
  2. How important is display quality for you? If you are a media consumer, the AMOLED and 120Hz refresh rate of the Poco F3 are significantly better.
  3. How important are versatile cameras? If you want to experiment with different focal lengths and macro shots, the A32 5G is more flexible.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: You want the best possible gaming and media consumption experience. Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco F3.
  • Scenario 2: You prioritize a versatile camera system and a slightly larger battery, while also saving money. Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A32 5G.
  • Scenario 3: You need a smooth, fast experience for daily tasks and multitasking. Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco F3.
  • Scenario 4: You are on a tight budget but still want 5G connectivity and decent performance. Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (check the price difference carefully).

My Choice

If I were to choose, I would pick the Xiaomi Poco F3.

Here's why:

  • Overall Experience: The Poco F3 offers a significantly better overall experience due to its superior display, performance, and faster charging. For the same price, the visual clarity and snappiness of the Poco F3 make it a far more enjoyable phone to use daily.
  • Future-Proofing: The Snapdragon 870 will keep the Poco F3 running smoothly for years to come compared to the A32 5G which could feel sluggish after 1-2 years of usage.
  • Prioritization: While the camera is important, I value smooth performance and a high-quality display more. The trade-off of losing the dedicated wide-angle and macro lens is worth the dramatic improvement in display, performance, and charging speed.

While the A32 5G offers a more versatile camera system, it falls short in other critical areas such as the display and overall performance. Unless the camera system is an absolute top priority, the Poco F3 is the much better all-around device. The slightly smaller battery isn't a concern as the fast charging will help mitigate the battery size difference.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.