Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 22, 2021 August 27, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 113.71 cm³ 82.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 205 g 183 g
Height 164.2 mm 166 mm
Width 76.1 mm 72.2 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 6.9 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • White
  • Green
  • Phantom Black
  • Pink
  • Gray
  • Thom Browne Edition
  • Wooyoungmi Edition
  • Lavender
  • Cream
  • Bespoke Edition
  • Dream White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 84.7 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 426 PPI
Refresh Rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 73.51 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.97 mAh/cm³ 39.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3300 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC3 Adreno 660

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 13 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the two phones, focusing on their practical implications:

Design

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5GPractical Impact
Form FactorStandardFoldableZ Flip3 offers a unique, compact design when folded, while A32 5G is a traditional slab phone.
Dimensions164.2 x 76.1 x 9.1 mm166 x 72.2 x 6.9 mmA32 5G is wider and thicker, making it bulkier, while Z Flip3 is slimmer and more pocketable when folded.
Weight205g183gZ Flip3 is noticeably lighter, improving comfort for extended use.
Build QualityUnknown screen protectionCorning Gorilla Glass VictusZ Flip3's screen is significantly more durable against scratches and drops due to Gorilla Glass Victus.

Display

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5GPractical Impact
Size6.5"6.7"Z Flip3 offers a slightly larger screen, potentially better for media consumption.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2640Z Flip3 has a much sharper display, with significantly more detail in images and text.
Pixel Density (PPI)270426Z Flip3's higher pixel density results in crisper visuals, less pixelation, and better overall viewing experience.
TechnologyTFT LCDUnknownA32 5G has TFT LCD which may have weaker viewing angles compared to Z Flip3's AMOLED. We don't know the display technology of the Z Flip3.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzZ Flip3's 120Hz refresh rate makes scrolling and animations appear much smoother and more fluid.
Brightness0 nits1200 nitsZ Flip3 has vastly superior screen brightness, making it much easier to see in bright outdoor conditions.

Performance

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5GPractical Impact
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)Z Flip3's Snapdragon 888 is a much more powerful chip, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score249,720898,700Z Flip3's significantly higher score shows much faster overall performance, suitable for demanding tasks.
GPUMali-G57 MC3Adreno 660Z Flip3's Adreno 660 is far superior for graphics-intensive tasks like gaming.

Camera

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5GPractical Impact
Main Camera Resolution48MP12.2MPA32 5G has higher megapixel count, but Z Flip3 has larger pixels for better low-light performance.
Main Camera Sensor Size1/2"1/2.55"A32 5G's larger sensor size has potential to capture more light which is better for low-light images.
Main Camera Pixel Size0.80 µm1.40 µmZ Flip3's larger pixel size should allow for better low-light performance and potentially better dynamic range.
Selfie Camera Resolution13MP10MPA32 5G has a slightly higher megapixel count.
Selfie Camera Aperturef/2.2f/2.4A32 5G has a wider aperture which allows it to capture more light.
Wide Angle Camera Resolution8MP13MPZ Flip3 has a higher megapixel count for its wide-angle lens.
Portrait Mode CameraYes (2MP)NoA32 5G has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode.
Macro LensYes (5MP)NoA32 5G has a dedicated macro lens.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps/120fps4K@30/60fps (HDR), 1080p@60/240fps (HDR), 720p@960fps (HDR)Z Flip3 offers superior video recording capabilities, including HDR support and higher frame rates, especially for slow motion.
Video StabilizationNoYesZ Flip3 has video stabilization, making it much smoother than A32 5G.
DXOMark ScoreNot tested111 (Mobile), 118 (Photo), 110 (Video)Z Flip3 offers better image and video quality than the A32 5G.

Battery

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5GPractical Impact
Capacity5000mAh3300mAhA32 5G has a significantly larger battery, likely to last much longer between charges.
Charging15W fast charging15W fast chargingBoth phones support similar 15W fast charging speeds.
Battery FeaturesNon-removableReverse charging, Non-removableZ Flip3 offers reverse charging to charge other devices, but both have a non-removable battery.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: The 5000mAh battery offers significantly longer battery life, ideal for users who prioritize battery endurance.
  • Dedicated Depth and Macro Cameras: Offers more versatility in photography, especially close-up shots and portraits.
  • Lower cost: This would be a more budget friendly phone.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Advantages:

  • Premium Foldable Design: Offers unique form factor, highly compact when folded, and a premium look.
  • Superior Display: Higher resolution, pixel density, 120Hz refresh rate, and much brighter screen for excellent visual quality.
  • Much Faster Performance: Snapdragon 888 chip provides vastly superior performance for all tasks, including gaming.
  • Better Camera System: Larger pixels, superior video recording (with HDR and stabilization), and more reliable image quality.
  • Reverse Charging: Ability to charge other devices wirelessly.
  • More Advanced Connectivity: Supports newer Wi-Fi standards and more Bluetooth profiles.
  • eSIM Support: Supports eSIM for digital carrier switching.
  • Better build quality: The screen is protected by Gorilla Glass Victus.
  • More Advanced Sensors: Includes Compass, Gyroscope, and Barometer

Trade-offs:

  • A32 5G: Lacks performance, premium build quality, and high-end camera quality, especially video.
  • Z Flip3 5G: Smaller battery capacity, missing dedicated macro and depth cameras, but excels in all other areas.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users: Prioritizing value and affordability.
  • Users with basic needs: Requiring a reliable device for everyday tasks.
  • Users who prioritize battery life: Requiring a phone that can last throughout the day with moderate use.
  • Casual Photographers: Wanting versatility in photography without needing high-end image quality.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G Ideal User:

  • Tech enthusiasts: Appreciating cutting-edge design and performance.
  • Users who value portability: Desiring a compact phone that fits easily into pockets.
  • Users who want a premium experience: Appreciating the best in display quality, performance, and camera capabilities.
  • Social Media content creators: Need good video recording and overall camera quality.
  • Gamers: Needs the best performance on the market to play games.

Specific Use Cases:

  • A32 5G:
    • Long trips where battery life is crucial.
    • Daily use for communication, browsing, and basic photography.
    • Situations where durability isn't a major concern.
  • Z Flip3 5G:
    • Content creation requiring high-quality photos and videos.
    • Gaming with demanding graphics.
    • Travel where the small and portable footprint is needed
    • Professional use where advanced features are crucial.
    • Users who want the premium and futuristic look and feel of the foldable phone.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • A32 5G: Offers good value for its price, focusing on battery life and basic features.
  • Z Flip3 5G: Is more expensive, but it is justified by its premium features, performance, and unique design.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is my budget? The A32 5G is much more affordable, while Z Flip3 5G is significantly more expensive.
  2. How important is battery life? The A32 5G offers significantly better battery endurance.
  3. How much do I value performance and features? Z Flip3 5G delivers a much more advanced experience, but it has a higher cost.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: If you need a reliable, everyday phone for basic tasks on a budget, the Galaxy A32 5G is the best option. It prioritizes battery life and adequate performance for common tasks.
  • Scenario 2: If you value the best performance, a unique foldable form factor, a superior display, and premium features, and you are willing to pay the extra, the Galaxy Z Flip3 5G is the clear choice.
  • Scenario 3: If you prioritize camera quality and are a content creator, the Galaxy Z Flip3 5G is far better with its better sensor, video recording, and features such as video stabilization.
  • Scenario 4: If you need the best portability and a more compact phone, and a small phone, then the Galaxy Z Flip3 5G is the better option.
  • Scenario 5: If you need an advanced sensor set, the Galaxy Z Flip3 5G has all the sensors you would need.

My Choice

If I were choosing, I would pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G. While the battery life is a trade-off, the overall experience is far superior. The performance leap provided by the Snapdragon 888, coupled with the much better display, makes it a far more enjoyable device to use. The foldable design is a bonus, adding a unique element not found in traditional phones. The camera system, though not having a macro or depth sensor, has a much better performance for photo and especially video quality. I would prefer this phone for gaming, content creation, and for general usage, as the phone has more advanced features. While the battery is a step down, I prefer the much more robust performance and display quality it offers.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.