Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Nokia X30 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia X30
Nokia X30
Nokia

General

Launch Date January 22, 2021 September 21, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 113.71 cm³ 93.94 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 205 g 185 g
Height 164.2 mm 158.9 mm
Width 76.1 mm 73.9 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Cloudy Blue
  • Ice White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.43 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 85 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 409 PPI
Refresh Rate 60 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 700 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 101.58 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.97 mAh/cm³ 44.71 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
GPU Mali-G57 MC3 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13 13

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs. Nokia X30

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GNokia X30Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions164.2 × 76.1 × 9.1 mm, 205g158.9 × 73.9 × 8 mm, 185gNokia X30 is smaller and lighter, making it more comfortable for one-handed use and carrying around. The A32 is larger and heavier.
Display
Size6.5"6.43"Very similar screen size, negligible difference for most users.
Resolution720x16001080x2400Nokia X30 has a much sharper and clearer display, better for viewing detailed content and text.
Pixel Density (PPI)270409Nokia X30 offers noticeably sharper images and text due to higher pixel density.
TechnologyTFT LCDAMOLEDNokia X30 provides richer colors, deeper blacks, and better contrast, enhancing the viewing experience, especially in dark settings and when watching HDR content.
Refresh Rate60Hz90HzNokia X30 provides slightly smoother scrolling and animations, which are noticeable in daily use and supported apps.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth have identical brightness at 0 nits, so it's unclear how they perform outdoors.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)Nokia X30 offers faster processing and better overall performance for gaming and demanding tasks due to its more advanced Snapdragon chipset.
AnTuTu Score249,720410,072Nokia X30 benchmarks significantly higher, indicating better speed for everyday tasks, multitasking, and running apps.
GPUMali-G57 MC3Adreno 619Nokia X30 has a better GPU, offering enhanced graphics performance for gaming and other GPU-intensive tasks.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh4200mAhSamsung Galaxy A32 5G has a larger battery, potentially offering longer battery life between charges.
Charging15W Fast Charging33W Fast ChargingNokia X30 charges much faster, reducing downtime.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/1.8, 1/2", 0.8µm (S5KGM2)50MP, f/1.8, 1.0µmNokia X30 captures slightly more detailed images with larger pixel sizes, leading to better low-light performance, though the exact sensor model is unknown.
Selfie Camera13MP, f/2.216MP, f/2.4, 1.0µmNokia X30 captures higher resolution selfies. The Samsung A32 has a wider aperture, so it might perform slightly better in low-light settings despite having a lower resolution sensor.
Wide Angle Camera8MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm13MP, f/2.4Nokia X30 captures higher resolution wide-angle photos. The Samsung A32 has a wider aperture, potentially meaning a better performance in low light despite the lower resolution.
Depth Camera2MP, f/2.4NoneSamsung Galaxy A32 5G provides depth information for portrait mode, though the quality of the 2MP sensor may be limited.
Macro Camera5MP, f/2.4NoneSamsung Galaxy A32 5G can take close-up macro shots, though image quality may not be the best due to the smaller 5MP sensor.
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, No stabilization1080p@30/60fps, Yes (OIS)Samsung A32 5G records 4K videos, offering better video quality, but lacks OIS. Nokia X30 provides more stable video recording due to OIS.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradeable to 13)Android 12 (upgradeable to 13)Nokia X30 has a newer OS version and is likely to receive longer support, though both will be upgradable to Android 13.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11a/b/g/n/ac802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax (Wi-Fi 6)Nokia X30 supports newer Wi-Fi 6, providing faster speeds and more reliable connections if you have a compatible router.
Bluetooth5.1 LE (A2DP, EDR, HID, LE)5.1 LE (A2DP, EDR, LE, APT-x, LDAC, SBC, AAC)Nokia X30 provides superior audio codec support for higher quality audio when using wireless headphones.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoNokia X30 offers slightly better GPS accuracy due to the support for additional QZSS satellites.
SIMDual SIM Dual Standby (Nano SIM + Nano SIM)Dual SIM Dual Standby (Nano SIM + Nano SIM)Both phones support dual sim, with 2 sim slots.
Storage
Internal64/128 GB128/256 GBNokia X30 offers more storage options, suitable for users with more media files or apps.
RAM4/6/8 GB6/8 GBSimilar RAM options ensure good performance on both.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone allows for storage expansion via SD card, so users must rely on internal storage or cloud services.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Dolby Digital PlusBasic audio featuresSamsung Galaxy A32 5G offers a superior audio experience with Dolby Atmos and Digital Plus, better for media consumption.
Security
Featuresside-mounted fingerprint sensorbasic fingerprint sensorSamsung A32 features a more advanced, likely faster, fingerprint sensor. The location is also different.
Build
ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass VictusNokia X30 uses superior screen protection. The Samsung A32 has an unknown type.
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, AccelerometerFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, GyroscopeNokia X30 has the gyroscope sensor, which could be important for motion-sensitive gaming and AR applications, and for more advanced navigation in some apps.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: Offers a larger 5000mAh battery, potentially providing longer usage time between charges.
  • 4K Video Recording: Supports 4K video recording, providing higher quality for vloggers and those looking for the best video quality.
  • Dolby Atmos Audio: Offers enhanced audio with Dolby Atmos and Dolby Digital Plus, which enhances the multimedia experience.
  • Additional Cameras: Features dedicated macro and depth sensors, offering more versatility for niche photography.

Nokia X30 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Has a sharper AMOLED display with higher resolution, better colors, and a smoother 90Hz refresh rate.
  • Faster Performance: Offers better performance overall, faster processing and better graphics due to the Snapdragon 695 chipset.
  • Faster Charging: Provides significantly faster 33W charging, reducing charging downtime.
  • Better Main Camera: Larger pixel size on its main sensor and a higher resolution wide-angle lens.
  • Optical Image Stabilization (OIS): Offers OIS for the main camera, which is crucial for stable, clear images and video.
  • Gyroscope sensor: Provides a better sensor configuration for motion-sensitive games and some AR apps.
  • Wi-Fi 6 Support: Supports the latest Wi-Fi 6 standard for faster wireless connectivity.
  • Better Bluetooth Audio Codec: Supports more codecs like Apt-X, LDAC, SBC, and AAC for better wireless audio quality.
  • Superior Screen protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus provides better screen protection against scratches.

Trade-offs:

  • Battery vs. Charging: The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G offers better battery life but slower charging, while the Nokia X30 has smaller battery and faster charging.
  • Video Quality vs. Stability: The Samsung A32 has 4K but no OIS, while the Nokia X30 provides stable video with OIS but limited to 1080p.
  • Audio Quality vs. Wireless Audio: The Samsung A32 has better sound through the speaker due to Dolby Atmos but has a lower bluetooth quality compared to the Nokia X30.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G is ideal for:

  • Budget-conscious users seeking a reliable device with a large battery and good all around performance for the price.
  • Users who need long battery life for extended use without frequent charging.
  • Casual photographers who appreciate the versatility of macro and depth sensors, despite limitations.
  • Users that consume a lot of media through the speakers: As the A32 5G provides a better experience than the Nokia X30.

Use Cases:

  • Long daily commutes where battery life is crucial.
  • Users who frequently take photos of various subjects and want to be able to record a video in 4K.
  • Users who want to watch a lot of videos through the phone's speaker.

Nokia X30 is ideal for:

  • Users who prioritize display quality, performance and speed.
  • Users who value fast charging to minimize downtime.
  • Mobile photographers who need a versatile and reliable main camera with OIS.
  • Users who often use Bluetooth headphones and prioritize good audio quality.
  • Users who require gyroscope sensors for games or apps.

Use Cases:

  • Users who stream videos and other media and want the best image quality.
  • Users that want a more fluid and smooth experience when using their phone.
  • Users who need to charge their phone quickly and get back to using it.
  • Users who often take photos/videos and want a stable image.
  • Users who want the best quality wireless sound and often use their bluetooth headphones.

Price-to-Value:

  • The price may vary based on the region. It's important to compare local prices for both phones.
  • If price is a major factor, the Samsung A32 might be the more affordable option.
  • If the budget allows, the Nokia X30 offers significantly more features for the price.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is my budget, and am I willing to pay more for better display quality and faster performance?
  2. Do I prioritize long battery life, or do I need faster charging?
  3. Do I need advanced camera features like 4K recording or better low-light performance with OIS?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Budget-Conscious User with Basic Needs: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G for its lower price and good enough features.
  • Scenario 2: Performance and Display Focused User: Choose the Nokia X30 for its superior display quality, faster performance, and quicker charging.
  • Scenario 3: Photography Enthusiast: Choose the Nokia X30 for its better main camera with OIS, even with its 1080p video recording limitation.
  • Scenario 4: Heavy User Who Needs Great Battery Life: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G for its larger battery.

My Choice:

If I had to choose between these two phones, I would choose the Nokia X30. While the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has a larger battery and some additional camera features, the Nokia X30 offers a superior overall experience. The display is significantly better, the performance is faster and more smooth, and the faster charging is very convenient. The OIS in the camera is also very important for me as I often take photos and videos, even though they are limited to 1080p. Finally, the improved bluetooth audio codec support would be a major benefit for my listening habits. The trade-offs, like a slightly smaller battery and lack of 4K, would be acceptable for the benefits the Nokia X30 offers.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.