Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Motorola Moto G32 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 22, 2021 August 16, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 113.71 cm³ 101.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.53 "/g
Weight 205 g 184 g
Height 164.2 mm 161.8 mm
Width 76.1 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Mineral Grey
  • Satin Silver
  • Rose Gold

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 85.4 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 60 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.97 mAh/cm³ 49.26 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver)
GPU Mali-G57 MC3 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13 13

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs. Motorola Moto G32

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GMotorola Moto G32Practical Impact
Launch Date2021-01-222022-08-16Moto G32 is a newer model, potentially offering more up-to-date software and features
Dimensions164.2 x 76.1 x 9.1 mm161.8 x 73.8 x 8.5 mmA32 5G is slightly larger, possibly feeling more substantial in hand; Moto G32 is more compact and potentially easier to handle
Weight205g184gMoto G32 is lighter, making it more comfortable for prolonged use

Display

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GMotorola Moto G32Practical Impact
Size6.5"6.5"Both phones have the same screen size, suitable for media consumption and general use
Resolution720x16001080x2400Moto G32 has a sharper display with significantly more detail, making text and images appear clearer
PPI270405Moto G32's higher pixel density results in a noticeably crisper viewing experience
TechnologyTFT LCDIPS LCDMoto G32's IPS LCD provides better viewing angles and color reproduction
Refresh Rate60Hz90HzMoto G32 offers smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the user experience
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth have identical peak brightness which is unfortunately unspecified. Likely both are ok for indoor use but struggle in direct sunlight.

Performance

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GMotorola Moto G32Practical Impact
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6 nm)Both are capable for everyday tasks; Snapdragon 680 tends to be more power-efficient; Specific performance may vary based on optimization.
AnTuTu Score249,720249,000Very similar overall performance; Both handle daily tasks well but may struggle with very demanding games
GPUMali-G57 MC3Adreno 610GPU performance is similar for everyday use; specific game performance may vary between the two

Camera

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GMotorola Moto G32Practical Impact
Standard Camera48MP, f/1.8, 1/2", 0.8µm pixels50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µm pixelsMoto G32 has slightly higher resolution; A32 5G has larger sensor, potentially better in low light
Selfie Camera13MP, f/2.216MP, f/2.2, 1.12 µm pixelsMoto G32 offers slightly higher resolution and larger pixels, potentially better selfies in various lighting
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.2, 1.12 µm pixels8MP, f/2.0, 1.12 µm pixelsMoto G32's wider aperture (f/2.0) captures slightly more light
Portrait Mode (depth)2MP, f/2.4Not presentA32 5G has dedicated depth camera for portrait effects; Moto G32 may rely on software for similar effects
Macro Lens5MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4, 1.75 µm pixelsA32 5G has higher resolution for macro shots, potentially capturing more detail
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, Slow-motion: Yes, 120 fps1080p@30fps, Slow-motion: Yes, 120 fpsA32 5G can record in 4K, offering better video quality and cropping flexibility; Both have 120 fps slow-motion for creative videos
Features4K Video, Quadruple Camera, Ultra stable video, etcOptical zoom, Triple camera, PDAF, LAF, RAW, etcA32 5G includes 4K video and ultra stable video; Moto G32 offers Optical zoom, better autofocus (PDAF & LAF) and the option to shoot in RAW

Battery

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GMotorola Moto G32Practical Impact
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth have good battery life for a full day of moderate use
Charging15W Fast Charging30W Fast ChargingMoto G32 charges much faster, reducing downtime
RemovableNon-removableNon-removableStandard battery design for both phones.

Software and Connectivity

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GMotorola Moto G32Practical Impact
OSAndroid 11, upgradable to 13Android 12, upgradable to 13Moto G32 launches with a newer OS version, potentially offering more features; both will likely get Android 13
Wi-Fi802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Dual band, Wi-Fi Hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Dual band, Wi-Fi Hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi DisplayBoth phones offer similar Wi-Fi connectivity, suitable for modern networks
Bluetooth5.1 LE, A2DP, EDR, HID, LE5.2 LE, A2DP, LEMoto G32 has a newer Bluetooth version; both support basic Bluetooth audio; A32 5G supports more profiles like EDR and HID
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, GalileoBoth have accurate location tracking; Moto G32 includes SUPL support
SIMDual SIM (Nano SIM)Dual SIM (Nano SIM)Both can support two SIM cards, convenient for managing multiple numbers
Internal Storage64 GB or 128 GB64 GB, 128 GB or 256 GBMoto G32 offers more storage (up to 256GB); Both have options for 64GB/128GB versions.
RAM4GB or 6GB or 8GB4GB or 6GB or 8GBBoth come in the same RAM configurations; enough for multitasking and daily use.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone has expandable storage.

Audio, Security and Sensors

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GMotorola Moto G32Practical Impact
Audio QualityDolby Atmos, Dolby Digital PlusDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphonesMoto G32 has better overall audio quality thanks to its stereo speakers and dual mic setup for better clarity, A32 5G includes Dolby Digital Plus.
SecuritySide-mounted fingerprint sensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensorBoth phones use fingerprint sensor, convenient for quick and secure unlocking
SensorsFingerprint, Accelerometer, Proximity, GeomagneticFingerprint, Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass, Gyroscope, HallMoto G32 features extra sensors; Gyroscope is beneficial for motion-sensitive games. Geomagnetic sensor can be used for directional applications.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Advantages:

  • 4K Video Recording: Offers higher quality video recording for detailed footage.
  • Larger Camera Sensor: Main camera has a slightly larger sensor size, potentially better low-light performance.
  • Dedicated Depth Sensor: The 2MP depth sensor allows for more accurate portrait mode photos.
  • Dolby Digital Plus: Offers richer surround sound audio.
  • Ultra Stable Video: For smoother video recording in unstable conditions.

Motorola Moto G32 Advantages:

  • Higher Resolution Display: Sharper and more detailed display for better viewing experience.
  • 90Hz Refresh Rate: Smoother scrolling and animations, making the phone feel more responsive.
  • Faster Charging: 30W charging significantly reduces charging times.
  • Newer Bluetooth Version: Bluetooth 5.2 for potentially more stable connections and higher data transfer.
  • Stereo Speakers: For better audio output when watching videos or listening to music.
  • Optical Zoom: Allows for some level of optical zoom rather than only digital.
  • Additional Sensors: Includes a gyroscope and compass, useful for motion-sensing games and accurate navigation.
  • Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF) & Laser Autofocus (LAF): Provides more rapid and accurate autofocus for photography.
  • RAW Shooting Support: Greater flexibility for post-processing of photos.

Trade-offs:

  • The A32 5G sacrifices display quality (resolution and refresh rate) and charging speed for the sake of 4K video recording and its depth sensor for portraits, larger primary camera sensor and Dolby Digital Plus
  • The Moto G32 does not support 4k video, and does not have a dedicated depth sensor for portraits, but excels in display quality and charging speeds. It also offers better sound with stereo speakers.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G:

  • Ideal Users: Users who prioritize higher video recording resolution and camera features. Good for casual users who want the best possible video and some extra camera features.
  • Use Cases:
    • Recording family moments in 4K
    • Taking portraits with a dedicated depth sensor
    • Content creation with 4K video
    • Users who enjoy Dolby surround sound.

Motorola Moto G32:

  • Ideal Users: Users who prioritize display quality, smooth performance, quick charging and audio quality. Users wanting a more modern overall device.
  • Use Cases:
    • Daily media consumption (videos, social media, web browsing)
    • Mobile gaming, particularly motion-sensing games
    • Users who desire fast battery charging
    • Users who want good quality audio and sound separation via stereo speakers
    • Photography enthusiasts who want RAW image capture

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is video quality to you? If 4K video recording is essential, the A32 5G is a better choice. If not, the Moto G32's superior display and audio might be preferable.
  2. How important is display quality? If a sharp, vibrant screen with smooth scrolling is a priority, the Moto G32 is the clear winner.
  3. How important is fast charging? If you prioritize quick charging, the Moto G32 offers much faster 30W charging, which is very noticeable compared to the 15W offered on the A32 5G.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Content Creator (Focus on Video): Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. Its 4K video recording and ultra stable feature is more crucial than the screen and charging speed differences.
  • Casual User (Balanced Experience): Motorola Moto G32. Its better display, faster charging and overall modern experience are likely more beneficial for everyday use.
  • Gamer (Motion-Based Games): Motorola Moto G32. The gyroscope and better display will make the gaming experience smoother and more enjoyable.
  • Photography Enthusiast: Motorola Moto G32. The optical zoom and RAW capture can enable more detailed images.

My Choice and Why

If I had to choose between these two phones, I would choose the Motorola Moto G32. Here's why:

  • Superior Display: The higher resolution and 90Hz refresh rate make a noticeable difference in everyday use. I spend a lot of time browsing the web, watching videos, and looking at photos, so the clearer and smoother display of the Moto G32 is a big advantage.
  • Faster Charging: The 30W charging is a significant upgrade, especially for someone like me who dislikes having to wait too long for a charge.
  • Better Overall User Experience: The newer Bluetooth version, extra sensors, and stereo speakers make the Moto G32 feel more modern and capable overall. The addition of optical zoom, PDAF, LAF and RAW shooting support makes the camera more practical for me than the 4K capabilities of the A32.
  • Practical Usage: The enhanced daily experience provided by a better display and faster charging will be more significant in my typical use cases, compared to the 4K video recording provided by the A32 5G.

While the A32 5G is a decent phone with its 4k video recording and a slightly larger camera sensor and Dolby Digital Plus audio, the Moto G32 offers a more well-rounded package that aligns better with my priorities.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.