1. Specifications Comparison
Here's a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G and Motorola Moto G24, focusing on practical implications:
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | Motorola Moto G24 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 164.2 × 76.1 × 9.1 mm | 163.5 × 74.5 × 8 mm | Moto G24 is slightly smaller, thinner and more pocketable. A32 5G has a slightly larger volume. |
| Weight | 205g | 181g | Moto G24 is noticeably lighter, which may be more comfortable for prolonged use. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.5" | 6.56" | Essentially the same screen size; both offer a similar viewing area. |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1612 | Very similar sharpness; both are HD+ resolution, which is acceptable for everyday use but not the sharpest available |
| PPI | 270 | 269 | Negligible difference in pixel density. Both will appear equally sharp in daily use. |
| Technology | TFT LCD | IPS LCD | IPS LCD offers better viewing angles and color reproduction compared to TFT, resulting in a better visual experience. |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 90Hz | Moto G24 offers smoother scrolling and animations; 90Hz is beneficial for gaming and overall fluidity. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 500 nits | Moto G24 is significantly brighter, making it much easier to use outdoors in sunlight. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | The Dimensity 720 (7nm) is theoretically more power efficient due to the smaller manufacturing process. |
| AnTuTu Score | 249,720 | 266,894 | Moto G24 has a slightly better benchmark score suggesting better overall system responsiveness. |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G52 MC2 | Dimensity 720 has a newer more efficient GPU. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera Res | 48MP, f/1.8 | 50MP, f/1.8 | Marginal difference in resolution, image quality may depend on other factors (sensor, software processing) |
| Main Camera Sensor | Samsung S5KGM2, 1/2" | Unknown | Samsung S5KGM2 has bigger sensor size improving low-light performance |
| Selfie Camera Res | 13MP, f/2.2 | 8MP, f/2.0 | A32 5G has a higher resolution selfie camera, however f/2.0 may allow slightly better low light photos on G24. |
| Wide Angle Res | 8MP, f/2.2 | 2MP, f/2.4 | A32 5G provides much higher resolution wide-angle photos; the difference is significant. |
| Depth Sensor | 2MP, f/2.4 | N/A | A32 5G has a dedicated depth sensor, which can result in better portrait mode photos; G24 has none. |
| Macro Lens Res | 5MP, f/2.4 | 2MP, f/2.4 | A32 5G has a higher resolution macro lens, useful for close-up shots. |
| Video Recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30fps | A32 5G can record in much higher 4K resolution, while G24 is limited to 1080p. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both have the same capacity for similar battery life. |
| Charging | 15W fast charging | 15W fast charging | Both offer the same charging rate. Expect similar charging times. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to 13 | Android 14 | Moto G24 comes with a newer OS version out of the box, ensuring longer support and better compatibility. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | Both support similar Wi-Fi standards; A32 5G has additional Wi-Fi Display technology |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 | A32 5G offers a newer Bluetooth version, potentially providing a slightly more stable connection and battery efficiency. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo | Moto G24 has additional SUPL support for location services |
| SIM | Dual SIM Dual Standby | Dual SIM Dual Standby | Both support dual SIM functionality, offering flexibility in managing two numbers. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 64GB/128GB | 128GB/256GB | Moto G24 offers double the maximum storage option; storage on both phones are non expandable; |
| RAM | 4GB/6GB/8GB | 4GB/8GB | Both provide adequate RAM options; with 8GB being the highest tier option; multitasking and gaming performance should be good on either phone. |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone allows for expandable storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Audio Quality | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Moto G24 has stereo speakers, which is better for listening to music or watching videos; A32 5G offers Dolby Digital Plus |
| Security | |||
| Biometrics | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Both offer the same type of fingerprint sensor, providing similar security and speed. |
| Sensors | Fingerprint, Accelerometer, Proximity | Fingerprint, Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass, Gyroscope | Moto G24 has additional sensors (Compass, Gyroscope), which can be useful for certain apps and games. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Advantages:
- Better Main Camera Sensor: Larger sensor (1/2") potentially leads to better low-light performance.
- Higher resolution wide angle lens: 8MP vs 2MP on Moto G24.
- Dedicated Depth Sensor: Offers better portrait mode photos with a dedicated depth sensor.
- Macro Lens: Higher resolution 5MP macro lens.
- 4K Video Recording: Superior video recording quality.
- Wi-Fi Display Support: Allows screen sharing over Wi-Fi for presentations.
- Slightly newer Bluetooth version: Bluetooth 5.1 vs 5.0 on Moto G24.
- Dolby Digital Plus: Offers advanced audio capabilities.
Motorola Moto G24 Advantages:
- Lighter and thinner: More comfortable for one-handed use and portability.
- IPS LCD Display: Offers better viewing angles and color reproduction compared to A32 5G's TFT panel.
- 90Hz Refresh Rate: Visibly smoother animations and scrolling.
- Brighter Display: 500 nits brightness, much better for outdoor visibility.
- Slightly Better Performance: Higher benchmark score suggesting better overall responsiveness.
- Newer Android Version: Comes with Android 14, which has longer-term support.
- Larger Storage Option: Maximum 256 GB internal storage vs 128GB on the A32 5G.
- Stereo Speakers: Offer a better audio experience with wider sound stage.
- Additional sensors: Compass and Gyroscope, enabling more app/gaming functionality.
Trade-offs:
- A32 5G: Sacrifices display quality and refresh rate for better video quality, a better main sensor and more versatile camera.
- Moto G24: Sacrifices overall camera versatility for a much better display and slightly better overall performance and general use.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G:
- Ideal User: Individuals who prioritize camera capabilities, especially video, and need versatile lenses.
- Use Cases:
- Capturing high-quality videos (4K).
- Taking a variety of photos using the wide-angle, portrait and macro lenses.
- Users who prefer having Dolby Digital Plus for enhanced audio.
- Price-to-Value: Offers decent camera features for the price range; a decent overall phone.
Motorola Moto G24:
- Ideal User: Those who want a smooth, modern user experience with a brighter display.
- Use Cases:
- General day-to-day usage, including social media, browsing, and video streaming.
- Gaming, benefiting from the higher refresh rate, extra sensors and stereo speakers.
- Users who are often outdoors and require better screen visibility.
- Price-to-Value: Good value with its smooth display, newer OS, and brighter screen.
4. Decision Framework
Consider these key questions before making a choice:
- How important is camera quality and versatility? If you are very particular about taking photos/videos, especially in low light conditions or 4k, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G is better with a better main camera and more lens options.
- How important is display quality and refresh rate? If you want a smoother, more visually pleasing experience, especially for outdoor visibility, the Motorola Moto G24's better LCD screen is much better.
- How much storage space do you need? If you need more space for photos, videos, and apps, the 256GB variant of the Moto G24 is more suitable.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1 (Photography Focus): If you take a lot of videos and photos, and low light photography is important, the A32 5G is a better choice due to a better main camera sensor and 4K video.
- Scenario 2 (Everyday Use): If you prioritize a smooth user experience, a brighter display, and a longer-term OS support, the Moto G24 is a better choice.
- Scenario 3 (Gaming): If you are a light gamer, the Moto G24 with its 90Hz display, stereo speakers and gyroscope will provide a better experience.
Final Recommendation
I would choose the Motorola Moto G24. Here's why:
While the Samsung A32 5G has its merits in camera versatility, the overall user experience with the Motorola Moto G24 is significantly better for my needs. The smoother 90Hz display and its brighter IPS LCD is a large benefit in day to day usage, and having a more modern OS with more internal storage will provide a better experience in the long term. While the camera might not be as versatile on paper, I think its still good enough for my use case, and would rather have better display quality for my daily driver. The G24's lighter build and stereo speakers also make it slightly more enjoyable for consuming media on the go. Although the A32 5G has the potential to take better photos and 4k videos, I think that the overall daily experience with the G24 outweighs this.
