Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Motorola Moto G (2023) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 22, 2021 May 25, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 113.71 cm³ 103.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.17 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 205 g 189 g
Height 164.2 mm 164 mm
Width 76.1 mm 75 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet
  • Ink Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.97 mAh/cm³ 48.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)
GPU Mali-G57 MC3 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G and Motorola Moto G (2023), focusing on practical implications:

Design

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GMotorola Moto G (2023)Practical Impact
Dimensions164.2 x 76.1 x 9.1 mm164 x 75 x 8.4 mmMoto G is slightly more compact, potentially more comfortable for one-handed use. A32 is slightly bulkier.
Weight205g189gMoto G is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for prolonged use and easier to carry.

Display

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GMotorola Moto G (2023)Practical Impact
Size6.5"6.5"Identical screen sizes offer comparable viewing areas.
Resolution720x1600720x1600Both have the same lower resolution, which means they may not be as sharp as higher resolution screens.
PPI270270Identical pixel density results in a similar level of sharpness.
TechnologyTFT LCDIPS LCDMoto G's IPS LCD offers better viewing angles and color reproduction than A32's TFT LCD.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzMoto G provides much smoother scrolling and animations, making the UI feel more fluid.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsNo brightness information available, making it impossible to compare visibility under various lighting conditions.

Performance

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GMotorola Moto G (2023)Practical Impact
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)Moto G has the advantage of Qualcomm chipset with a higher performance rating.
AnTuTu Score249,720380,000Moto G offers significantly faster performance, leading to smoother multitasking and better app responsiveness.
GPUMali-G57 MC3Adreno 619Moto G's Adreno 619 GPU provides better gaming performance.

Camera

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GMotorola Moto G (2023)Practical Impact
Standard Camera48MP, f/1.8, 1/2", Samsung S5KGM2, 0.80 µm pixel size48MP, f/1.7, 0.80 µm pixel sizeMoto G's wider aperture (f/1.7) allows it to gather more light, potentially resulting in better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera13MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.0, 1.12 µm pixel sizeA32 has a higher resolution front camera, but Moto G has a wider aperture and larger pixel size, both may perform well in low-light conditions.
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.2, 1.12 µm pixel sizeNot availableA32 has an additional wide-angle camera for capturing more of a scene.
Portrait Mode (Depth)2MP, f/2.4Not availableA32 has an additional depth camera for better portrait mode effects.
Macro Lens5MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4, 1.75 µm pixel sizeA32 has a higher resolution macro lens, but the Moto G has larger pixel size.
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 1080p@120fps, Slow-motion: 120 fps1080p@30fps, Slow-motion: No, 30 fpsA32 records higher quality videos (4K) and higher slow-motion frame rate than the Moto G.

Battery

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A32 5GMotorola Moto G (2023)Practical Impact
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth phones offer the same battery capacity, generally suggesting similar battery life.
Charging15W Fast Charging15W Fast ChargingIdentical charging speeds mean similar charging times; Neither is particularly fast by modern standards.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Advantages

  • Versatile Camera System: Includes dedicated wide-angle, depth, and macro lenses, offering more photographic flexibility.
  • Higher Video Recording Capabilities: Supports 4K video recording, beneficial for users needing high-quality video capture and higher frame rate for slow-motion.
  • More RAM Options: Available with up to 8 GB of RAM, which can improve multitasking capabilities.

Motorola Moto G (2023) Advantages

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 480+ chipset and higher AnTuTu score provide noticeably better processing power and faster app loading.
  • Smoother Display: The 120Hz refresh rate makes scrolling and animations significantly more fluid, enhancing the overall user experience.
  • Wider Aperture: The wider f/1.7 aperture on the main camera allows better low-light performance.
  • eSIM: The phone supports eSIM, which gives users more flexibility with mobile plans.
  • Newer Software: The Moto G comes with Android 13 out of the box compared to the older Android 11 on the A32.

Trade-offs

  • Samsung Galaxy A32 5G: Better camera flexibility but is less performant.
  • Motorola Moto G (2023): Superior performance and a smoother screen at the cost of fewer camera options and a less flexible video recording experience.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G

  • Ideal User: Someone who prioritizes camera versatility and wants a variety of shooting options (wide-angle, macro, depth), along with the ability to record 4K video.
  • Use Cases: Social media content creation, casual photography, capturing a variety of scenes, light gaming.
  • Value: Offers a versatile camera system, however, the phone is older and has weaker performance than the competition

Motorola Moto G (2023)

  • Ideal User: Someone who values a smooth user experience, fast app loading, and overall snappiness.
  • Use Cases: Everyday use, moderate gaming, fast multitasking, media consumption, those who need an eSIM.
  • Value: Provides better performance and a more fluid display than the A32, at the expense of camera versatility, which makes this a superior phone if performance and experience are valued more.

4. Decision Framework

Here are three key questions to ask yourself before making a decision:

  1. How important is camera versatility? If you need multiple lenses and video recording capabilities, the A32 might be preferable.
  2. How important is overall performance and a smooth experience? If the performance and a fluid 120hz screen are more important, the Moto G is better.
  3. Are you ok with older software? The A32 was released with Android 11, whereas the Moto G was released with Android 13.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • For Photography Enthusiasts: If you are looking for a camera that can do different things, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G will suit you more because of its versatile camera system.
  • For Everyday Users and Gamers: If you want a phone that feels quick, has a smoother display, and has a more modern software, the Motorola Moto G (2023) is a better choice due to its superior performance, refresh rate, and Android 13.
  • For Value Seekers: The Motorola Moto G (2023) is the better choice as it has a better display, better performance, and is more modern.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would pick the Motorola Moto G (2023). Here's why:

While the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G offers more camera versatility, the performance difference between the two phones is significant. The smoother 120Hz display, the faster Snapdragon 480+ chipset and more modern software of the Motorola Moto G (2023) make for a much more enjoyable overall experience during general usage, and are a bigger advantage to me than the extra cameras.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.