Samsung Galaxy A25 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date December 16, 2023 January 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 102.23 cm³ 98.16 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.54 "/g
Weight 197 g 188.5 g
Height 161 mm 162.3 mm
Width 76.5 mm 75.6 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Personality Yellow
  • Fantasy Blue
  • Midnight Black
  • Ice Blue
  • Mint Green
  • Ocean Sunset

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.2 % 87.5 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.91 mAh/cm³ 50.94 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1280 (5 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Mali-G68 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 13
Maximum OS Version 18 16

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy A25 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer the everyday user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A25Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions161x76.5x8.3mm162.3x75.6x8mmRedmi is slightly taller and narrower, negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight197g188.5gRedmi is noticeably lighter, enhancing one-handed use.
Display
Size6.5"6.67"Redmi offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzAMOLED, 120HzBoth offer vibrant colors and smooth scrolling; Samsung potentially boasts better color accuracy.
Resolution1080x23401080x2400Virtually identical pixel density; sharpness won't be a differentiating factor.
Peak Brightness1000 nits (HBM)1800 nits (peak)Redmi's significantly higher peak brightness ensures superior outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1280 (5nm)Snapdragon 685 (6nm)Exynos 1280 generally offers better performance in benchmarks and gaming.
CPUOcta-coreOcta-coreWhile both are Octa-core, architectural differences favor the Exynos 1280 for demanding tasks.
GPUMali-G68Adreno 610Mali-G68 provides a stronger graphics performance edge for gaming and visually intensive apps.
RAM8GB8GBBoth offer ample RAM for multitasking and smooth operation.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhIdentical battery capacity suggests similar longevity, dependent on usage patterns.
Other
OSAndroid 14Android 13A25 ships with the latest Android version, offering potential feature and security advantages.
FingerprintSide-mountedUnder-displayPreference-based; under-display often perceived as more modern.
Video Recording4K@30fps1080p@30fpsSamsung allows for higher resolution video capture.

2. Key Insights

The Samsung Galaxy A25 distinguishes itself with a generally more powerful processor (Exynos 1280), potentially leading to smoother performance in demanding applications and games. Its 4K video recording capability caters to content creators. The newer Android 14 OS promises the latest features and security updates.

The Redmi Note 13 4G counters with a significantly brighter display, crucial for outdoor readability. It's also slightly lighter, improving handling comfort. While its Snapdragon 685 may not match the Exynos 1280 in raw power, it's still capable of handling everyday tasks efficiently.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Galaxy A25: Suited for users who prioritize performance, gaming capabilities, and recording high-quality videos. Those seeking the latest software features and updates will also find the A25 appealing.

Redmi Note 13 4G: Ideal for users who consume a lot of media outdoors and value a bright, vibrant display. Its lighter weight enhances comfort for extended use. Price-conscious buyers might find the Redmi more attractive if budget is a primary concern.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. Is raw performance for gaming or demanding apps a top priority? If yes, lean towards the Galaxy A25.
  2. Do you frequently use your phone outdoors in bright sunlight? If yes, the Redmi Note 13 4G's superior brightness is a strong advantage.
  3. Which software experience do you value more: the latest features or established stability? The A25 offers newer Android; however, individual preferences for UI and features should be considered.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two, I'd opt for the Samsung Galaxy A25. While the Redmi Note 13 4G's brighter display and lighter weight are tempting, I prioritize the superior processing power and 4K video recording offered by the A25. The newer Android version also promises a longer lifespan of software support and access to the latest features. As someone who values a smooth user experience for both productivity and occasional gaming, the performance edge offered by the Exynos 1280, coupled with future-proofing through the latest OS, makes the Galaxy A25 the more compelling choice for me.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.