Samsung Galaxy A25 vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date December 16, 2023 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 102.23 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 197 g 222 g
Height 161 mm 162.3 mm
Width 76.5 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Personality Yellow
  • Fantasy Blue
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.2 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.91 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1280 (5 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A25 vs. Samsung Galaxy M35: A Holistic Comparative Analysis

As a technology researcher with a focus on holistic mobile device analysis, I present a comparative assessment of the Samsung Galaxy A25 and the Samsung Galaxy M35, grounded in comprehensive data and market research.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A25Samsung Galaxy M35Technological ContextStrategic Category
Launch Date2023-12-162024-05-24Indicates market positioning and potential access to latest software updates.Innovation Potential
ChipsetExynos 1280 (5 nm)Exynos 1380 (5 nm)Newer chipset generally translates to improved performance, efficiency, and feature support. A generational leap signifies a notable advantage.Performance Metrics
CPUOcta-core (2x2.4 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)M35's CPU configuration suggests better multi-core performance due to more powerful cores.Performance Metrics
GPUMali-G68Mali-G68 MP5MP5 variant in the M35 denotes a more powerful GPU, promising enhanced graphics capabilities.Performance Metrics
Battery Capacity5000 mAh6000 mAhLarger battery capacity indicates longer usage time.User Experience Indicators
Display6.5" Super AMOLED, 120Hz6.6" Super AMOLED, 120HzBoth offer smooth visuals due to 120Hz refresh rate; M35 boasts slightly larger screen real estate.User Experience Indicators
OS & Max VersionAndroid 14, up to Android 18Android 14A25's confirmed longer software update cycle contributes to longevity and security.Ecosystem Integration
Video Capabilities4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fpsM35 supports more diverse video recording options, including higher frame rates and slow-motion capture.Innovation Potential
Weight & Dimensions197g, 161x76.5x8.3mm222g, 162.3x78.6x9.1mmA25 is lighter and more compact, potentially enhancing portability.User Experience Indicators
Price RangeMediumMediumSuggests comparable pricing; value proposition depends on specific features and user priorities.User Ecosystem Alignment

2. Strategic Technological Insights

The M35 showcases a clear performance advantage with its newer Exynos 1380 chipset, improved CPU and GPU, and enhanced video recording capabilities. This signifies Samsung's strategy of incremental innovation within its mid-range lineup, focusing on tangible performance improvements year-over-year. The A25, however, counters with a guaranteed longer software update lifecycle, reflecting a growing emphasis on device longevity and sustained user experience.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment

Both devices cater to the mid-range market seeking a balance of performance, features, and affordability. The M35 aligns with users prioritizing performance and multimedia creation, while the A25 appeals to those valuing long-term software support and a more compact form factor.

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework

The rapid pace of mobile technology evolution necessitates considering future-proofing. The M35's superior hardware provides a stronger foundation for future software updates and emerging applications. The A25's confirmed update cycle offers assurance against rapid obsolescence but may be limited by its slightly older hardware in the long run.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M35

While the A25 presents a compelling case with its confirmed update cycle and lighter form factor, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M35. The performance gains offered by the newer chipset, improved GPU, and enhanced video capabilities are significant advantages. These factors contribute to a more future-proof device, capable of handling demanding applications and multimedia tasks for a longer period. The slightly larger battery capacity and screen size further enhance the user experience. While the longer software support of the A25 is attractive, the M35's superior hardware provides a more robust foundation for future updates and emerging mobile experiences, making it a more compelling long-term investment.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.