Samsung Galaxy A25 vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date December 16, 2023 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 102.23 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 197 g 213 g
Height 161 mm 161.1 mm
Width 76.5 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Personality Yellow
  • Fantasy Blue
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.2 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.91 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1280 (5 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 18 18

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A25 and the Samsung Galaxy A55. We'll move beyond the raw numbers to understand how these devices translate into real-world experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A25Samsung Galaxy A55User Experience Impact
Display6.5" Super AMOLED, 120Hz6.6" Super AMOLED, 120HzA55 offers slightly larger screen real estate, potentially enhancing media consumption. Both benefit from smooth scrolling with 120Hz.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder DisplayA55's under-display sensor provides a more modern, integrated aesthetic. Side-mounted can be more readily accessible for some users.
Weight/Dimensions197g, 161x76.5x8.3mm213g, 161.1x77.4x8.2mmA25 is noticeably lighter, potentially reducing hand fatigue during extended use. Dimensional differences are minimal.
OS & UpdatesAndroid 14, up to Android 18Android 14, up to Android 18Identical software experience and long-term update support ensures consistency across both devices.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Imagine a student using these phones. With the A25's lighter weight, carrying it in a backpack all day feels less burdensome. The vibrant Super AMOLED display on both phones makes reviewing study materials and streaming videos engaging. However, the A55's slightly larger screen might offer a more immersive experience when watching educational videos.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For users prioritizing portability: The A25's lighter weight is a significant advantage.
  • For media enthusiasts: The A55's slightly larger display and potentially more powerful GPU (Xclipse 530 vs. Mali-G68) could provide a better multimedia experience. Note: We lack benchmark comparisons to definitively state GPU performance differences.
  • For tech-savvy users: The A55's under-display fingerprint sensor and newer chipset might appeal.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Both phones offer a compelling user experience. The choice boils down to individual priorities:

  • Prioritize portability and comfort: Choose the Galaxy A25.
  • Prioritize a slightly larger display and potentially more powerful performance: Choose the Galaxy A55.

My Choice:

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A55. While the A25 offers a compelling lightweight design, I value the slightly larger display for media consumption and productivity. The under-display fingerprint sensor contributes to a more premium feel. Additionally, the newer Exynos 1480 processor in the A55, built on a 4nm process compared to the A25's 5nm Exynos 1280, suggests potential performance improvements, though real-world benchmarks would be needed to confirm this. The potential for a smoother, faster experience aligns with my preference for a device that can handle demanding tasks efficiently. Though heavier, the marginal weight difference is acceptable considering the overall benefits the A55 offers. It represents a more future-proof investment in terms of performance and features.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.