Samsung Galaxy A25 vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date December 16, 2023 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 102.23 cm³ 90.05 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 197 g 189 g
Height 161 mm 171.4 mm
Width 76.5 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 7.1 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Personality Yellow
  • Fantasy Blue
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.2 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1000 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 84.02 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.91 mAh/cm³ 44.42 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1280 (5 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G68 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 18 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A25Motorola Razr 50 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions161x76.5x8.3mm171.4x74x7.1mmRazr 50 Ultra is taller and slightly thinner when unfolded, but significantly thicker when folded due to its foldable design. A25 is more pocketable when unfolded.
Weight197g189gRazr 50 Ultra is slightly lighter despite the larger screen.
FoldableNoYesRazr 50 Ultra offers a compact folded mode for portability and a larger screen when unfolded.
Display
Size6.5"6.9"Razr 50 Ultra provides a more immersive viewing experience.
TypeSuper AMOLED, 120HzFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 165Hz, HDR10+Razr 50 Ultra boasts superior display technology with higher refresh rate, color depth, HDR support, and peak brightness, leading to a significantly better visual experience.
Resolution1080x23401080x2640Similar pixel density, but Razr 50 Ultra has a slightly taller aspect ratio.
Refresh Rate120Hz165HzRazr 50 Ultra offers smoother scrolling and animations.
Peak BrightnessN/A3000 nitsRazr 50 Ultra's significantly higher brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility. Lack of data for the A25 limits a complete comparison.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1280 (5nm)Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)Razr 50 Ultra features a more powerful and efficient processor.
CPUOcta-coreOcta-coreRazr 50 Ultra's CPU architecture is newer and more powerful, resulting in better performance.
GPUMali-G68Adreno 735Razr 50 Ultra's GPU offers superior graphics performance.
RAM8GB12GBRazr 50 Ultra allows for smoother multitasking and better handling of demanding applications.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh4000mAhGalaxy A25 has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life. Foldable displays and more powerful processors can significantly impact real-world usage.
Other
OSAndroid 14Android 14Both run the latest Android version. Razr limits future updates to Android 17, while the A25 is expected to receive updates until Android 18.
Storage256GB/8GB256GB/12GBIdentical storage, but Razr 50 Ultra has more RAM.
Video Capabilities4K@30fpsUp to 1080p@960fpsRazr 50 Ultra offers significantly more advanced video recording options, including higher frame rates and slow-motion capabilities.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A25 Advantages:

  • Potentially Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity suggests longer usage time.
  • Lower Price (Inferred): While price isn't explicitly stated, A series phones generally target a lower price point than foldable phones.
  • More Expected Software Updates: Longer software support lifespan.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers portability and a larger screen when needed.
  • Significantly Superior Display: Brighter, smoother, and with better color reproduction.
  • More Powerful Performance: Handles demanding tasks and gaming with ease.
  • Advanced Video Capabilities: Offers a wide range of recording options.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A25:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users prioritizing battery life and basic functionality.
  • Use Cases: Everyday tasks, web browsing, social media, casual gaming.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra:

  • Ideal User: Users who value cutting-edge technology, portability, and a premium multimedia experience, and are willing to pay a premium for it.
  • Use Cases: Demanding applications, mobile gaming, content creation, enjoying multimedia on a high-quality display.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Budget: How much are you willing to spend?
  2. Priority Features: Is a foldable design, superior display, or powerful performance crucial? Or is battery life and affordability more important?
  3. Usage Pattern: Will you primarily use the phone for basic tasks or demanding applications and multimedia consumption?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Usage: Samsung Galaxy A25
  • Desire for Latest Technology & Premium Experience: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

My Choice: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

While the potential for longer battery life on the A25 is appealing, the Razr 50 Ultra's significant advantages in display quality, performance, and the innovative foldable design outweigh the battery concern for me. I value a premium multimedia experience and appreciate the portability offered by the foldable form factor. The more powerful processor future-proofs the device for demanding applications and ensures a smooth user experience. While potentially more expensive, the Razr 50 Ultra offers a compelling package of cutting-edge features.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.