Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs ZTE Blade V60 Design - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 5, 2023 June 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.41 cm³ 106.33 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 195 g 198 g
Height 162.1 mm 164.2 mm
Width 77.6 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Lime Green
  • Blue gradient
  • Dark red
  • Champagne Gold
  • Dark Blue
  • Sunrise Violet

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.4 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.89 mAh/cm³ 47.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A24 4GZTE Blade V60 DesignPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3164.2 x 75.3 x 8.6A24 slightly smaller and thinner
Weight (g)195198Negligible weight difference
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality comparison not possible
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLED, 90HzIPS LCD, 90HzA24 offers more vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and potentially better outdoor visibility.
Size (inches)6.56.6V60 slightly larger screen
Resolution1080 x 2340720 x 1612A24 significantly sharper and more detailed (396 ppi vs 267 ppi) impacting clarity of text and images.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations
Peak Brightness1000 nitsNot specifiedA24 likely to perform better in direct sunlight; V60's sunlight visibility is unknown.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99 (6nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)A24 likely more power efficient and potentially offers better performance due to smaller process node and more powerful CPU cores.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)A24 boasts faster clock speeds leading to quicker app launches and smoother multitasking.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G57 MP1A24 has a slightly more powerful GPU, potentially beneficial for gaming.
RAM6GB4/6GB6GB RAM on A24 provides smoother multitasking; V60 offers a 4GB variant which might lead to performance limitations.
Storage128GB256GBV60 offers significantly more storage space for apps, photos, and videos.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPResolution similar; image quality depends on sensor and processing which cannot be fully compared due to lacking specifications (e.g., sensor size, pixel size).
Other Cameras5MP Ultrawide, 2MP Macro, 13MP Selfie2MP Depth, 0.3MP unspecified, 8MP SelfieA24 offers a more versatile camera setup with an ultrawide lens; the purpose of the 0.3MP camera on the V60 is unclear.
Video Recording1080p@30fps with EIS1080p@30fpsSimilar video resolution; A24 benefits from Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother footage.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity, actual battery life depends on optimization and usage.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology provides richer colors and deeper blacks. Higher resolution results in sharper visuals.
  • Better Performance: More powerful processor and GPU for smoother multitasking and gaming. More efficient chipset.
  • More Versatile Camera: Ultrawide lens offers broader perspectives.

ZTE Blade V60 Design Advantages:

  • Larger Storage: 256GB storage allows for storing more files and apps.
  • Lower Price: Positioned in the low price range, offering greater affordability.

Trade-offs:

  • A24: Higher price for better display, performance, and camera.
  • V60: Lower resolution display, potentially less powerful performance, and less versatile camera system for a lower price.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G:

  • Ideal User: Users who prioritize display quality, performance, and camera versatility. Users who consume media, play mobile games, and value a smooth user experience.
  • Use Cases: Multimedia consumption, mobile gaming, photography, everyday tasks.

ZTE Blade V60 Design:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize storage space and basic functionality. Users primarily focused on communication, web browsing, and light app usage. Users who require ample storage for files.
  • Use Cases: Basic communication (calls, texts), web browsing, social media, file storage.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The V60 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Heavy users will appreciate the A24's performance, while light users might find the V60 sufficient.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize display, performance, and camera (A24) or storage and affordability (V60).

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A24 4G

While the ZTE Blade V60 Design offers a tempting price and large storage, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G is the better overall device. The superior AMOLED display, more powerful processor, and more versatile camera system significantly enhance the user experience. The performance difference and vastly improved display would be noticeable in day-to-day use. For me, these factors outweigh the V60's larger storage and lower price. The A24 offers a better balance of performance, features, and user experience, making it a more worthwhile investment in the long run. The price difference is justifiable considering the significant advantages offered by the A24.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.