Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs Xiaomi Poco F6 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 5, 2023 May 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.41 cm³ 95.66 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.73 "/g
Weight 195 g 179 g
Height 162.1 mm 160.5 mm
Width 77.6 mm 74.5 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Lime Green
  • Blue gradient
  • Dark red
  • Black
  • Green
  • Titanium

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.4 % 89.8 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness 1000 nits 2400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.89 mAh/cm³ 52.27 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A24 4GXiaomi Poco F6Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3160.5 x 74.5 x 8.0Poco F6 is slightly shorter, narrower, and thinner. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)195179Poco F6 is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use and reducing pocket bulk.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.67Poco F6 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution1080 x 23401220 x 2712Poco F6 has a significantly sharper display with higher pixel density (446 vs 396 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120Poco F6's 120Hz display provides smoother animations and scrolling compared to the A24's 90Hz.
Display TypeSuper AMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. However, Poco F6 supports HDR10+ and Dolby Vision for enhanced dynamic range in compatible content, and a much higher peak brightness.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)Poco F6 boasts a significantly more powerful processor, enabling much faster performance in demanding tasks, gaming, and multitasking.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)Poco F6's CPU architecture is more modern and powerful.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 735Poco F6's GPU is considerably more powerful, delivering a superior gaming experience and smoother graphics rendering.
RAM6GB8/12GBPoco F6 offers more RAM, further enhancing multitasking capabilities and overall system responsiveness.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP Main, 5MP Ultrawide, 2MP Macro50MP Main (Sony IMX882), 8MP UltrawideBoth have similar main camera resolution. Poco F6 has a slightly better ultrawide sensor. Information regarding OIS is conflicting for the A24, making direct comparison difficult.
Front Camera13MP20MPPoco F6 has a higher resolution front camera for potentially better selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 4K@60fpsPoco F6 offers significantly better video recording capabilities with higher resolution and frame rates.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Both phones have the same battery capacity. Real-world battery life will depend on usage and optimization.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Typically more affordable than the Poco F6.

Xiaomi Poco F6 Advantages:

  • Significantly Superior Performance: Much faster processor, GPU, and more RAM for a smoother and more responsive experience.
  • Better Display: Sharper, smoother, with HDR10+ and Dolby Vision support for a more immersive visual experience.
  • Enhanced Camera Features: Higher resolution front camera, superior video recording capabilities.
  • Lighter and More Compact: Noticeably lighter for comfortable handling.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G:

  • Budget-conscious users: Prioritize affordability over top-tier performance.
  • Light users: Primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and social media browsing.

Xiaomi Poco F6:

  • Performance enthusiasts: Demand fast and smooth performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications.
  • Content consumers: Enjoy watching videos, playing games, and browsing high-quality images.
  • Mobile photographers/videographers: Value high-quality cameras and advanced video recording features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A24 is a budget-friendly option, while the Poco F6 is a mid-range device.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Light users might find the A24 sufficient, while power users will appreciate the Poco F6's performance.
  3. How important is display quality and camera performance? The Poco F6 excels in these areas.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F6

While the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G offers a decent package for its price, the Xiaomi Poco F6 is the clear winner for me. The significantly improved performance, superior display, and enhanced camera capabilities make it a much more compelling device. The price difference is justified by the substantial upgrade in overall user experience. While battery life comparisons are difficult without real-world testing, the Poco F6's more efficient processor might offset the higher refresh rate. The lighter weight is a bonus for daily comfort. As someone who values a smooth and responsive user experience and appreciates high-quality visuals, the Poco F6 aligns better with my needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.