Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs vivo iQOO 12 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 5, 2023 November 14, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 104.41 cm³ 100.33 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.42 "/g
Weight 195 g 198.5 g
Height 162.1 mm 163.2 mm
Width 77.6 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Lime Green
  • Blue gradient
  • Dark red
  • Black
  • Red
  • White (BMW M branding)

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.4 % 89.6 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 453 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1400 nits
Peak Brightness 1000 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 108.77 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.89 mAh/cm³ 49.83 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A24 4Gvivo iQOO 12Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3163.2 x 75.9 x 8.1iQOO 12 slightly larger, negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)195198.5Negligible weight difference.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.78iQOO 12 offers a larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 23401260 x 2800iQOO 12 has a sharper display with higher pixel density (453 ppi vs 396 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90144iQOO 12's higher refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations, especially noticeable in gaming and fast-paced content.
Display TypeSuper AMOLEDLTPO AMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. iQOO 12's LTPO panel allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, potentially saving battery.
Peak Brightness (nits)10003000iQOO 12 is significantly brighter, ensuring better visibility outdoors and in bright conditions.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99 (6nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm)iQOO 12 boasts a significantly more powerful processor, resulting in much faster performance in demanding tasks like gaming and multitasking.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)iQOO 12's CPU architecture and higher clock speeds provide a substantial performance advantage.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 750iQOO 12 has a much more powerful GPU, delivering significantly better gaming performance and graphics rendering.
RAM (GB)612/16iQOO 12 offers more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and handling of demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Comparable megapixel count, but sensor details missing for A24, making detailed comparison impossible.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 8K@30fpsiQOO 12 offers significantly higher video resolution and frame rate options.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity. Actual battery life depends on usage and optimization.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G Advantages:

  • Potentially more affordable: Likely significantly cheaper than the iQOO 12.

vivo iQOO 12 Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: Superior CPU, GPU, and more RAM ensure a much smoother and faster user experience.
  • Superior display: Larger, sharper, brighter, and with a higher refresh rate for a more immersive and responsive visual experience.
  • More advanced camera features: Higher resolution video recording capabilities. Limited information about the A24's camera makes a complete comparison difficult.
  • Faster Charging (Likely): While not explicitly stated, flagship phones like the iQOO 12 generally offer faster charging speeds than mid-range phones like the A24.

Trade-offs:

  • Price: The iQOO 12's superior performance and features come at a significantly higher price.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality: calling, texting, web browsing, social media, and light photography.

vivo iQOO 12: Users who demand top-tier performance for demanding tasks: gaming, video editing, multitasking, and high-quality photography/videography. Also suitable for users who prioritize a premium display and the latest technology.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A24 is a budget-friendly option, while the iQOO 12 is a premium device.
  2. What are your primary use cases? For basic tasks, the A24 suffices. For demanding tasks and gaming, the iQOO 12 is necessary.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The iQOO 12 offers a vastly superior display and performance.

My Choice: vivo iQOO 12

While the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G likely offers good value for its price, the vivo iQOO 12 is the clear winner for me. The significant leap in performance, the stunning display, and advanced camera capabilities are compelling. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, especially for gaming and multitasking, making the iQOO 12's powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor and high refresh rate display essential. While the price difference is substantial, the iQOO 12 offers a significant upgrade in almost every aspect, justifying the higher cost for my needs. The A24 would be a good choice for budget-conscious users, but I am willing to invest in the premium experience offered by the iQOO 12.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.