Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs Motorola Moto G34 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 5, 2023 December 29, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 104.41 cm³ 97.1 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 195 g 179 g
Height 162.1 mm 162.7 mm
Width 77.6 mm 74.6 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Lime Green
  • Blue gradient
  • Dark red
  • Ice Blue
  • Ocean Green
  • Charcoal Black
  • Vanilla Cream

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.4 % 84 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.89 mAh/cm³ 51.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A24 4GMotorola Moto G34Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3162.7 x 74.6 x 8.0The Moto G34 is slightly wider but thinner and lighter. Negligible difference in everyday use.
Weight (g)195179Moto G34 feels noticeably lighter in hand.
Display
Display TypeSuper AMOLED, 90HzIPS LCD, 120HzA24 offers more vibrant colors and deeper blacks due to AMOLED. G34 has a smoother experience due to the higher refresh rate.
Resolution1080 x 2340720 x 1600A24 has a significantly sharper display. Text and images will appear clearer and more detailed.
Pixel Density (PPI)396270Noticeably sharper image quality on the A24.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzG34 offers smoother scrolling and animations. More noticeable in games and fast-paced content.
Peak Brightness (nits)1000 (peak)Not specifiedA24 likely performs better in direct sunlight. Missing G34 brightness data limits comparison.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99 (6nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm)Snapdragon 695 generally offers better performance and 5G connectivity, which is absent in the A24.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz A76 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660)Comparable CPU performance, but specific benchmarks are needed for accurate comparison.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 619Adreno 619 generally provides better gaming performance.
RAM6GB (as reviewed)4GB/8GBMore RAM in the reviewed A24 allows for smoother multitasking. However, the G34 also offers an 8GB RAM variant.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPResolution is the same, but sensor quality and image processing will determine the real-world difference which is not available in the specs.
Ultrawide5MPNot specified but mentioned as 118° ultra-wide in the descriptionA24 has a dedicated ultrawide, though low resolution. Need more details on the G34 "ultrawide" claim.
Selfie Camera13MP16MPG34 has a higher resolution selfie camera.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsSimilar video recording capabilities on paper.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity, actual battery life depends on optimization and usage.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution and pixel density result in a noticeably clearer and more detailed viewing experience.
  • AMOLED Display: Provides richer colors, deeper blacks, and potentially better outdoor visibility.

Motorola Moto G34 Advantages:

  • Higher Refresh Rate: Smoother scrolling, animations, and gaming experience.
  • 5G Connectivity: Offers faster data speeds and improved network performance in areas with 5G coverage.
  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable to hold and use for extended periods.
  • Potentially Lower Price: Depending on the specific RAM/storage configuration, the Moto G34 might be cheaper.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G: Ideal for users who prioritize display quality and consume lots of media.

Motorola Moto G34: Suitable for users who value smooth performance, 5G connectivity, and a lightweight design. Good for gaming and everyday tasks. Budget-conscious users might find it appealing.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is 5G connectivity a necessity? If yes, the Moto G34 is the only option.
  2. How important is display quality? If sharpness and vibrant colors are paramount, the A24 is preferred.
  3. What is your budget? Compare prices for specific RAM/storage configurations.

My Choice: Motorola Moto G34

While the Samsung Galaxy A24 has a superior display, the Motorola Moto G34 offers a more well-rounded package for my needs. 5G connectivity is future-proofing and increasingly important for faster data speeds. The 120Hz refresh rate, though paired with a lower resolution display, provides a noticeable improvement in daily use and gaming. The lighter weight is also a plus for comfortable handling. While specific benchmark comparisons are lacking, the Snapdragon 695 generally outperforms the Helio G99 in overall performance. Finally, the potential price advantage makes the Moto G34 a compelling value proposition. The lack of precise brightness information for the G34 is a concern, but the other advantages outweigh this missing data point for me.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.