Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 5, 2023 August 22, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.41 cm³ 106 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.08 "/g
Weight 195 g 221 g
Height 162.1 mm 162.8 mm
Width 77.6 mm 76.6 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Lime Green
  • Blue gradient
  • Dark red
  • Obsidian
  • Hazel
  • Porcelain
  • Rose Quartz

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.8 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1344 x 2992
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.4 % 89.4 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 486 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 2000 nits
Peak Brightness 1000 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 109.43 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.89 mAh/cm³ 47.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5060 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G715 MC7

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 21

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A24 4GGoogle Pixel 9 Pro XLPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3162.8 x 76.6 x 8.5Pixel 9 Pro XL slightly larger and heavier.
Weight (g)195221A24 noticeably lighter for one-handed use.
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedBuild quality and materials unknown, limiting comparison.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.8Pixel offers a larger screen for media consumption.
Resolution1080 x 23401344 x 2992Pixel has significantly sharper display (higher pixel density).
TypeSuper AMOLED, 90HzLTPO OLED, 120HzPixel boasts smoother scrolling and animations with higher refresh rate and more power efficient LTPO technology.
Peak Brightness1000 nits3000 nitsPixel significantly brighter, ensuring better outdoor visibility. HDR10+ support enhances dynamic range for richer colors.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99 (6nm)Google Tensor G4 (4nm)Tensor G4 expected to offer significantly faster performance and AI capabilities due to more advanced architecture and manufacturing process.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)Pixel's CPU utilizes newer core architectures, resulting in substantial performance gains.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G715 MC7Pixel's GPU offers a significant leap in graphical performance for gaming and demanding tasks.
RAM6GB16GBPixel offers vastly more RAM for smoother multitasking and heavy app usage.
Camera
Rear Cameras50MP Main, 5MP Wide, 2MP Macro50MP Main, 48MP Wide+Macro, 48MP TelephotoPixel boasts higher resolution wide and telephoto lenses, enabling superior zoom capabilities and versatility.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 8K@30fpsPixel offers significantly higher video resolution and frame rate options.
Front Camera13MP42MPPixel's front camera has much higher resolution for better selfies.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5060 mAhSimilar battery capacities, but real-world battery life will depend on optimization and usage.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G Advantages:

  • Lighter and more compact: Easier for one-handed use and portability.
  • Lower price: More budget-friendly option.

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Advantages:

  • Significantly faster performance: Tensor G4 chip provides a major boost in processing power for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Superior display: Higher resolution, refresh rate, and peak brightness deliver a dramatically better viewing experience.
  • More versatile camera system: Higher resolution sensors, telephoto lens, and advanced video recording capabilities.
  • More RAM: Enables smoother multitasking and handling of demanding applications.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality – calling, texting, web browsing, and social media. Best for light users who don't play demanding games or require advanced camera features.

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: Suitable for power users, photographers, videographers, and gamers. Excellent for those who demand top-tier performance, a stunning display, and a cutting-edge camera system.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A24 is a mid-range device, while the Pixel 9 Pro XL is a premium flagship.
  2. What are your primary smartphone uses? For basic tasks, the A24 suffices. For demanding tasks, gaming, or photography/videography, the Pixel excels.
  3. How important are display quality and performance? The Pixel offers a significant upgrade in both areas.

My Choice: Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

While the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G offers a budget-friendly option, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is the clear winner for me. The superior performance, stunning display with LTPO, versatile camera system with a dedicated telephoto lens, and significantly larger RAM justify the higher price. The future-proofed 5G connectivity, WiFi 7, and expected longer software update support from Google solidify its value proposition for long-term use. As someone who values a smooth and powerful user experience with advanced camera capabilities, the Pixel 9 Pro XL aligns better with my needs. The A24's lighter weight is appealing, but the Pixel's advantages in crucial areas outweigh this single benefit.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.