Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs Google Pixel 8a - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 5, 2023 May 14, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.41 cm³ 98.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.24 "/g
Weight 195 g 188 g
Height 162.1 mm 152.1 mm
Width 77.6 mm 72.7 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Lime Green
  • Blue gradient
  • Dark red
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain
  • Bay
  • Aloe

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.1 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.4 % 81.2 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 430 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits 2000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 120.72 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.89 mAh/cm³ 45.64 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4492 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) Google Tensor G3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Immortalis-G715s MC10

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 21

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A24 4GGoogle Pixel 8aPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3152.1 x 72.7 x 8.9Pixel 8a is noticeably smaller and slightly thicker. More pocketable and comfortable for one-handed use, but potentially less screen real estate.
Weight (g)195188Pixel 8a is slightly lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without material information.
Display
Display Size (inches)6.56.1A24 offers a larger display for more immersive media consumption, but may be less comfortable for one-handed use.
Resolution1080 x 23401080 x 2400Similar sharpness due to similar pixel density, but the Pixel 8a's slightly taller aspect ratio is better for scrolling web pages.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120Pixel 8a's higher refresh rate provides smoother animations and scrolling, leading to a more responsive and visually appealing experience.
Display TypeSuper AMOLEDOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. The A24's "1000 nits (peak)" suggests potentially better outdoor visibility compared to unspecified peak brightness for Pixel 8a.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)Google Tensor G3 (4 nm)Tensor G3 is significantly more powerful, enabling faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better performance in demanding games and AI tasks. The 4nm process also suggests better power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510)Pixel 8a has a more modern and powerful CPU architecture, translating to a substantial performance advantage.
RAM (GB)68More RAM in Pixel 8a allows for more apps to run in the background without impacting performance.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5064Pixel 8a boasts a higher resolution sensor and the renowned Google image processing, likely resulting in superior image quality, especially in detail and low-light conditions. Specific sensor size information for A24 would be needed for a more thorough comparison.
Video Recording1080p@30fps with EISUp to 4K@60fps with OISPixel 8a offers significantly better video recording capabilities with higher resolution and frame rates, along with Optical Image Stabilization for smoother footage.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004492While the A24 has a larger battery capacity, the Tensor G3's efficiency could potentially offset this difference in real-world usage. Actual battery life would depend on usage patterns.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G Advantages:

  • Larger Display: Provides a more immersive experience for media consumption.
  • Potentially Better Battery Life: Larger battery capacity might result in longer usage time, though this depends on factors like software optimization and usage patterns. This is uncertain given the Pixel 8a's more efficient processor.

Google Pixel 8a Advantages:

  • Significantly Superior Performance: The Tensor G3 offers a major performance advantage for demanding tasks, gaming, and multitasking.
  • Advanced Camera System: Higher resolution sensor, Google's image processing algorithms, and superior video recording capabilities.
  • Smoother Display: The 120Hz refresh rate offers a more fluid and responsive user experience.
  • More Future-Proof OS: Longer software update support, ensuring security and new features for a longer period.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G: Users primarily focused on media consumption, casual gaming, and basic tasks, prioritizing a large display and potentially longer battery life on a budget.

Google Pixel 8a: Users who value performance, a smooth user experience, a top-tier camera, and the latest software updates. Ideal for power users, mobile gamers, and photography enthusiasts.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A24 is likely more affordable.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? (e.g., social media, gaming, photography)
  3. How important are performance and software updates?

My Choice: Google Pixel 8a

While the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G offers a larger display and potentially longer battery life, the Google Pixel 8a's significant advantages in performance, camera quality, software support, and display smoothness make it the superior choice for me. The Tensor G3 chip provides a noticeable real-world difference in speed and responsiveness, and the Pixel's camera consistently delivers excellent results. While the A24 might be suitable for budget-conscious users with basic needs, I prioritize a fluid, powerful, and future-proof smartphone experience, which the Pixel 8a delivers. The slightly smaller display is a worthwhile trade-off for the overall performance and feature set.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.