Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs Cubot KingKong X - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 5, 2023 July 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.41 cm³ 262.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 1.7 "/g
Weight 195 g 388 g
Height 162.1 mm 170.9 mm
Width 77.6 mm 82.2 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 18.7 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Lime Green
  • Blue gradient
  • Dark red
  • Black

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.58 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.4 % 74.2 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 401 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 235.59 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.89 mAh/cm³ 38.83 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 10200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A24 4GCubot KingKong XPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3170.9 x 82.2 x 18.7Cubot is significantly larger and thicker, less pocketable.
Weight (g)195388Cubot is much heavier, potentially tiring for extended use.
Build MaterialUnspecifiedUnspecifiedDurability and premium feel cannot be compared without this information.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.58Negligible size difference.
Resolution1080 x 23401080 x 2408Similar sharpness; Cubot slightly taller due to aspect ratio.
TypeSuper AMOLED, 90HzIPS LCD, 120HzSamsung offers more vibrant colors and deeper blacks; Cubot has smoother scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness1000 nitsUnspecifiedSamsung likely performs better in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99 (6nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm)Cubot's Dimensity 7050 offers significantly better CPU and GPU performance, leading to smoother multitasking and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz A76 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Cubot has faster and more powerful cores for demanding tasks.
RAM6GB16GBCubot has much more RAM, enabling better multitasking and preventing app closures in the background.
Storage128GB256/512GBCubot offers significantly more storage for apps, photos, and videos.
Camera
Main Camera50MP100MPCubot has a higher resolution sensor, but image quality depends on factors beyond megapixels (sensor size, processing).
Front Camera13MP32MPCubot has a higher resolution front camera, potentially resulting in better selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsCubot offers higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh10200 mAhCubot has significantly larger battery capacity, potentially lasting much longer on a single charge.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology provides vibrant colors and deeper blacks compared to Cubot's IPS LCD.
  • More Compact and Lightweight: Easier to handle and carry.

Cubot KingKong X Advantages:

  • Significantly More Powerful: The Dimensity 7050 chipset and 16GB RAM offer a much smoother and faster user experience, especially for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Much Larger Battery: Potentially double the battery life of the Samsung.
  • Higher Resolution Cameras: Offers the potential for more detailed photos and videos, although real-world performance depends on other factors.
  • More Storage: Provides ample space for apps, media, and files.
  • 5G Connectivity: Offers faster data speeds and lower latency compared to 4G.

Trade-offs:

  • Size and Weight: Cubot's rugged design and massive battery result in a much larger and heavier phone.
  • Display Quality: While Cubot's 120Hz refresh rate is smoother, Samsung's AMOLED panel offers superior color accuracy and contrast.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G: Suitable for users who prioritize a compact and lightweight phone with a vibrant display for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and casual photography. Good for users on a tighter budget.

Cubot KingKong X: Ideal for users who demand high performance for gaming, multitasking, and media consumption. Also suitable for those who need extended battery life and ample storage. The rugged design might appeal to users who work outdoors or in demanding environments.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Cubot is slightly more expensive, but offers significantly more in terms of performance, battery, and storage.
  2. What are your primary use cases? For casual use, the Samsung might suffice. For demanding tasks and gaming, the Cubot is a better choice.
  3. Do you prioritize portability or battery life? The Samsung is more compact and lightweight, while the Cubot offers much longer battery life.

My Choice: Cubot KingKong X

While the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G offers a compelling AMOLED display and compact design, the Cubot KingKong X's significant advantages in performance, battery life, and storage make it the better overall choice for me. The Dimensity 7050 and 16GB RAM ensure a smooth user experience for years to come, while the massive 10200mAh battery eliminates battery anxiety. The larger storage capacity also caters to my need for storing photos, videos, and files. I am willing to compromise on the slightly larger size and weight for the substantial gains in performance and battery life. The 5G connectivity is also a future-proofing feature that I value.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.