Samsung Galaxy A23 vs Xiaomi Poco F4 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 25, 2022 June 27, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 106.84 cm³ 95.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.42 "/g
Weight 195 g 195 g
Height 165.4 mm 163.2 mm
Width 76.9 mm 76 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.7 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 86.6 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 900 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 101.15 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.8 mAh/cm³ 47.12 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 650

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 14 13

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A23 vs. Xiaomi Poco F4: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's move beyond the spec sheet and delve into the real-world experience of using the Samsung Galaxy A23 and the Xiaomi Poco F4. We'll explore how design choices translate into tangible user benefits, focusing on a narrative approach to understand their unique personalities.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A23Xiaomi Poco F4User Experience Impact
Interface DesignOne UI Core 4.1MIUI 13 for POCOMIUI offers extensive customization, while One UI Core focuses on simplicity and ease of use. This impacts user preference for control vs. streamlined experience.
Interaction FlowStandard AndroidMIUI OptimizationsPoco F4 might offer smoother performance due to software optimizations and a more powerful processor, leading to faster app loading and multitasking.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard AndroidStandard AndroidBoth offer basic Android accessibility features. Specific user needs should be evaluated individually.
Design ErgonomicsPlastic Body, 195gGlass Body, 195gWhile the same weight, the Poco F4's glass body feels more premium. The A23's plastic build might be more durable for some users but less aesthetically pleasing.
DisplayPLS LCD, 90HzAMOLED, 120HzPoco F4's AMOLED display offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling due to the higher refresh rate, providing a more visually engaging experience.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a photography enthusiast using both phones to capture a vibrant street scene. The Poco F4's superior camera system, with a 64MP main sensor and optical image stabilization, allows for capturing detailed shots even in challenging lighting conditions. Its ability to record 4K video at 60fps enables capturing smooth, high-resolution footage. Meanwhile, the A23, while capable, might struggle in low light and produce less detailed images.

Scenario: A student uses their phone for both studying and gaming. The Poco F4's powerful Snapdragon 870 processor ensures a lag-free gaming experience and smooth multitasking between apps. The A23's Snapdragon 680, while efficient, might show some slowdown with demanding games or heavy multitasking. The Poco F4's AMOLED screen enhances the gaming visuals significantly.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For users prioritizing affordability: The A23 offers a good balance of features at a lower price point.
  • For power users and gamers: The Poco F4's superior performance and display make it a clear winner.
  • For casual users: Both phones offer satisfactory performance for everyday tasks like social media and web browsing. However, the Poco F4's display offers a more enjoyable visual experience.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Poco F4 is designed for a user who values performance, visual fidelity, and a premium feel. The A23 prioritizes practicality, durability, and affordability.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F4

While both phones have their merits, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco F4. My decision stems from a holistic evaluation that prioritizes user experience. The Poco F4's AMOLED display is a significant differentiator, offering a vibrant and engaging visual experience that significantly elevates daily interaction. The superior performance ensures smooth multitasking and handles demanding tasks with ease. Although the glass body might be more prone to damage, I find the enhanced visual and performance aspects crucial for a satisfying user experience. The investment in a slightly higher price point is justified by the noticeable uplift in daily usability and the longevity ensured by the powerful processor. The Poco F4 isn't just about specifications; it's about how those specifications translate into a more enjoyable and efficient user experience, aligning with my core mission as a technology communications specialist.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.