Samsung Galaxy A23 vs Tecno Spark Go 2024 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 25, 2022 December 7, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 106.84 cm³ 106.43 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g N/A
Weight 195 g 0 g
Height 165.4 mm 163.7 mm
Width 76.9 mm 75.6 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach
  • Mystery White
  • Alpenglow Gold
  • Magic Skin
  • Gravity Black

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.8 mAh/cm³ 46.98 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A23 vs. Tecno Spark Go 2024: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy A23 and the Tecno Spark Go 2024, focusing on the user experience rather than just specs. We'll use stories and scenarios to bring these devices to life.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A23Tecno Spark Go 2024User Experience Impact
Interface DesignModern, minimalist aestheticTrendy, youthful designA23 offers a cleaner look, Spark Go might appeal to users preferring vibrant styles.
Interaction FlowSmooth, responsive 90Hz display90Hz display, potential lagA23's superior processor likely ensures smoother multitasking and app switching, crucial for a frustration-free experience.
AccessibilityOne UI, robust featuresHiOS, customization optionsOne UI generally offers better accessibility features and wider language support, potentially making A23 more inclusive.
ErgonomicsSlim, lightweightSlightly thickerNegligible difference, both comfortable for average users. A23's slightly lighter weight might be preferable for extended use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for online classes, social media, and casual gaming.

  • A23 Story: The student seamlessly switches between video lectures and taking notes, thanks to the snappy Snapdragon processor and 90Hz display. The vibrant PLS LCD screen offers clear visuals, even outdoors.
  • Spark Go Story: The student enjoys the Spark Go's large screen for watching lectures, but experiences occasional lag when switching apps or playing games. The lower resolution screen might make detailed note-taking slightly less comfortable.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • Visually Impaired Users: A23's more established accessibility features within One UI would likely provide a more accessible experience.
  • Budget-Conscious Users: Spark Go's lower price point makes it an attractive option, but performance compromises might impact user satisfaction in the long run.
  • Tech-Savvy Users: A23's overall performance and features would likely be more appealing to users who demand a responsive and versatile device.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Choosing between these devices depends on individual priorities:

  • Prioritize Performance and Smoothness: A23 is the clear winner.
  • Prioritize Affordability: Spark Go offers a budget-friendly option.
  • Prioritize Trendy Design: Spark Go's youthful aesthetics might be more appealing.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A23

While the Tecno Spark Go 2024 boasts a tempting price and modern design, the Samsung Galaxy A23 offers a more holistic and fulfilling user experience. Its superior processor, higher resolution display, and the generally more polished One UI contribute significantly to a smoother, more enjoyable interaction. For me, the investment in a slightly more expensive device is justified by the long-term benefits of a lag-free performance and a more robust software experience. This aligns with my belief in prioritizing user experience over purely focusing on specifications or initial cost savings. A phone is a tool we use constantly, and investing in a smoother, more reliable experience dramatically improves daily life.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.