Samsung Galaxy A23 vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 25, 2022 April 22, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 106.84 cm³ 94.68 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.7 "/g
Weight 195 g 181 g
Height 165.4 mm 163.7 mm
Width 76.9 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach
  • White
  • Gray
  • Mint

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 87 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.8 mAh/cm³ 52.81 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 642L

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 14 16

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A23 vs. A73 5G: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy A23 and A73 5G, focusing on the user experience rather than just raw specifications. We'll use storytelling and relatable scenarios to bring these devices to life.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A23Samsung Galaxy A73 5GUser Experience ImpactCategory
Display6.6" PLS LCD, 90Hz6.7" Super AMOLED Plus, 120HzThe A73 offers a visually richer experience with vibrant colors and smoother scrolling thanks to the AMOLED display and higher refresh rate. This makes media consumption and gaming significantly more enjoyable.Interface Design
BuildPlasticPlasticWhile both have plastic builds, the A73 feels slightly more premium due to its slimmer profile. However, durability concerns might be similar.Design Ergonomics
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder-displayUnder-display sensors offer a modern, integrated aesthetic, but side-mounted sensors can sometimes be more reliable and easier to access without looking at the device. User preference will play a significant role here.Interaction Flow
OS & UpdatesAndroid 12 (up to 14)Android 12 (up to 16)The A73 benefits from longer software support, ensuring security updates and new features for a longer period. This contributes to a feeling of ongoing device value and prolonged usability.Accessibility Features

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a student using your phone to take notes in a lecture hall and then unwinding with a movie later. The A23's 90Hz display provides smooth scrolling through documents, but the A73's 120Hz AMOLED screen truly shines when watching videos, offering a more immersive cinematic experience with deeper blacks and vibrant colors.

Scenario: You're a photographer capturing a beautiful sunset. The A73's 108MP main camera captures significantly more detail than the A23's 50MP sensor, allowing for larger prints and more flexibility in cropping. The optical image stabilization on both phones ensures steady shots even in low light.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For a budget-conscious user: The A23 provides excellent value with its long battery life and solid performance for everyday tasks.

For a power user: The A73's superior processor, 5G connectivity, and enhanced camera system cater to demanding users who prioritize speed and performance.

For an older adult: Both phones offer large, clear displays, but the A23's side-mounted fingerprint sensor might be easier to use than the A73's under-display sensor. Simple mode on Samsung devices could benefit users less familiar with smartphones.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The A23 is a well-rounded phone for everyday use, prioritizing practicality and affordability. The A73 elevates the experience with a focus on performance, visual fidelity, and future-proofing through longer software updates.

My Choice: The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

While the A23 is a solid contender, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. The superior AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, combined with the more powerful processor and longer software update commitment, makes it a more compelling long-term investment. The improved camera system is also a significant advantage for capturing life's moments in greater detail. Though slightly more expensive, the enhanced user experience and future-proofing offered by the A73 justify the price difference for me. I value the smoother performance, vibrant visuals, and the peace of mind knowing my device will be supported for a longer time. It's a phone designed for a more engaging and enjoyable user experience in the long run.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.