Samsung Galaxy A23 vs Oppo Reno8 T - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 25, 2022 February 2, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 106.84 cm³ 92.56 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.57 "/g
Weight 195 g 180 g
Height 165.4 mm 160.8 mm
Width 76.9 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach
  • Black Starlight
  • Orange Sunset

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.43 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 409 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 430 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 120.93 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.8 mAh/cm³ 54.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 14 14

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A23 vs. Oppo Reno8 T: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's dive beyond the numbers and explore these phones as complete user experiences, focusing on how their features translate into real-world usability for diverse individuals.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A23Oppo Reno8 TUser Experience Impact
Display6.6" PLS LCD, 90Hz6.43" AMOLED, 90HzOppo's AMOLED offers richer colors and deeper blacks, enhancing visual immersion for media consumption.
Design PhilosophyPractical, durableSleek, modernOppo prioritizes aesthetics, while Samsung leans towards functional durability.
InterfaceOne UI, customizableColorOS, highly customizableBoth offer extensive customization, catering to individual preferences.
ErgonomicsLarger, may feel bulkySlimmer, lighter, easier to holdOppo's slimmer profile enhances one-handed usability.
BiometricsSide-mounted fingerprintUnder-display fingerprintOppo's under-display fingerprint offers a more modern, integrated aesthetic.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for note-taking in a lecture hall. The Galaxy A23's larger LCD screen might offer a slightly better viewing experience for detailed notes, but its bulk could make one-handed use challenging. The Reno8 T's vibrant AMOLED display could make diagrams and images pop, and its slimmer profile would be easier to manage in a crowded space.

Scenario: A photographer capturing quick snapshots on the go. Both phones offer decent cameras, but the Reno8 T's 108MP main lens could provide more detail for larger prints or cropping flexibility. However, the lack of optical stabilization might be a drawback in low light or when capturing action shots. The A23's optical image stabilization provides more consistent quality in varying conditions.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For a senior user: The A23's larger display and potentially more robust build might be preferable. However, the Reno8 T's lighter weight could reduce strain during extended use.

For a young professional: The Reno8 T's sleek design and vibrant display might appeal more, aligning with a modern aesthetic.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Galaxy A23 prioritizes practicality and durability, appealing to users who value a robust, functional device. The Reno8 T emphasizes a sleek, modern design and a vibrant visual experience, catering to users who prioritize aesthetics and media consumption.

My Choice: The Oppo Reno8 T.

While the Galaxy A23 offers a practical approach, the Reno8 T resonates more with my design sensibilities. The AMOLED display's visual richness, coupled with the slimmer, more ergonomic design, creates a more engaging and enjoyable user experience. The under-display fingerprint sensor adds a touch of modern elegance. While the camera's lack of OIS is a minor drawback, the overall package leans towards a more refined and user-centric design philosophy, making it my preferred choice. It aligns with my appreciation for technology that seamlessly integrates into daily life, offering both functionality and aesthetic appeal. The slightly higher price is justified by the significantly enhanced visual and tactile experience.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.