Samsung Galaxy A23 vs Nokia G42 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G42
Nokia G42
Nokia

General

Launch Date March 25, 2022 June 28, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 106.84 cm³ 107.56 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.38 "/g
Weight 195 g 193.8 g
Height 165.4 mm 165 mm
Width 76.9 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach
  • Red
  • Purple
  • Gray

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.56 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 82.7 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 560 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 116.19 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.8 mAh/cm³ 46.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 14 14

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A23 vs. Nokia G42: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy A23 and the Nokia G42, focusing on the user experience rather than just raw specifications. We'll use storytelling and relatable scenarios to understand how these devices perform in the real world.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A23Nokia G42User Experience Impact
Interface DesignModern, One UI basedClean, stock AndroidSamsung offers a more feature-rich, potentially overwhelming UI. Nokia provides a simpler, potentially more intuitive experience.
Interaction FlowSmooth, 90Hz refresh rateSmooth, 90Hz refresh rateBoth offer fluid navigation, but the higher resolution of the A23 might make visuals appear sharper.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsStandard Android accessibility optionsSimilar accessibility features, reliant on Android OS capabilities.
Design ErgonomicsSlim, lightweight designSlightly thicker and heavierA23 might feel more comfortable for extended use due to its slimmer profile.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a busy professional who relies on their phone for communication, multitasking, and entertainment.

  • Galaxy A23: Our professional appreciates the vibrant display and crisp resolution of the A23 when presenting detailed charts to clients. The responsive interface allows for seamless switching between work apps and personal messaging.

  • Nokia G42: Our professional values the clean and uncluttered interface of the G42, making it easy to focus on tasks without distractions. The longer battery life ensures they stay connected throughout their workday. The repairable design of the G42 provides peace of mind knowing that minor accidents can be easily fixed, reducing electronic waste.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For a Tech-Savvy User: The Galaxy A23's feature-rich One UI and higher resolution display might be appealing.
  • For a Casual User: The Nokia G42's simplicity and clean interface might provide a more straightforward experience. Also, its repairability is a big plus for users concerned about the environment and longevity.
  • For a User with Visual Impairments: Both devices rely on standard Android accessibility features. However, the A23's higher resolution screen could potentially offer a slightly better experience for users who require larger text or sharper visuals.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The choice between the A23 and G42 ultimately depends on individual user preferences and priorities. If a vibrant display, extensive customization options, and a slim design are paramount, the A23 might be the preferred choice. If simplicity, a clean interface, repairability and a longer software update lifespan are more important, the G42 is a strong contender.

My Choice: Nokia G42

While the Samsung Galaxy A23 boasts a more vibrant display and a sleeker design, I would choose the Nokia G42. My decision hinges on the following:

  • Simplicity and Longevity: I prefer the cleaner, less cluttered interface of stock Android. Nokia's commitment to providing extended software updates and security patches ensures a longer lifespan for the device, aligning with my value of sustainability.
  • Repairability: The G42's repairable design is a significant factor. The ability to easily replace commonly damaged parts like the battery, screen, and charging port resonates with my belief in responsible consumption and reducing electronic waste. This feature empowers users and promotes a more sustainable approach to technology ownership.
  • Focus on Essentials: While a high-resolution display is nice, it's not a deal-breaker for me. I prioritize a smooth user experience, reliable performance, and long-term usability, areas where the G42 excels. The slightly lower resolution is a worthwhile trade-off for the benefits of repairability and software longevity. In a world of increasingly complex technology, the G42's simplicity is a refreshing change. It's a phone designed to work well and last, making it a more sustainable and ultimately, a more user-friendly choice.
Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.