Samsung Galaxy A23 vs Motorola Moto G54 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 25, 2022 September 5, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 106.84 cm³ 95.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.67 "/g
Weight 195 g 177 g
Height 165.4 mm 161.6 mm
Width 76.9 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach
  • Midnight blue
  • Indigo blue
  • Glacier blue
  • Mint green

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.8 mAh/cm³ 52.41 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A23 vs. Motorola Moto G54: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's move beyond the numbers and delve into the user experience offered by the Samsung Galaxy A23 and the Motorola Moto G54. We'll use a narrative approach to understand how these devices translate technical specs into real-world usability.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A23Motorola Moto G54User Experience Impact
Interface DesignOne UI 4.1 (Android 12)My UX (Android 13)My UX generally offers a cleaner, closer-to-stock Android experience.
Interaction Flow90Hz PLS LCD120Hz IPS LCDMoto G54's smoother refresh rate provides a more fluid and responsive user experience.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard AndroidStandard AndroidBoth offer basic Android accessibility features.
Design Ergonomics195g177gMoto G54 is lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone to take notes in a fast-paced lecture. The Moto G54's 120Hz refresh rate makes scrolling through documents and rapidly jotting down notes feel incredibly smooth. The slightly lighter weight also reduces hand fatigue during long study sessions. On the other hand, the Galaxy A23, while functional, might feel a tad sluggish in comparison due to the 90Hz display.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both phones cater to a broad audience with their mid-range pricing and standard Android features. However, users sensitive to screen flicker might prefer the IPS LCD of the Moto G54 over the PLS LCD of the A23. The Moto G54's lighter weight also benefits users with mobility limitations.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

User-Friendly Guidance: If a smooth and responsive display is a top priority, the Moto G54's 120Hz refresh rate is a clear winner. For those seeking a slightly more affordable option, the Galaxy A23 still provides a decent user experience.

Intuitive Comparison Criteria: Prioritize screen refresh rate and weight for a noticeable difference in daily use.

Design-Driven Insights: The Moto G54 demonstrates a design philosophy focused on performance and comfortable handling, while the A23 leans towards affordability.

My Choice: Motorola Moto G54

As Sophia Rodriguez, my analysis prioritizes the user experience. The Moto G54, with its smoother 120Hz display, lighter weight, and more recent Android version, delivers a more fluid and enjoyable user experience. While the Samsung Galaxy A23 is a viable option, the Moto G54's subtle yet significant design choices create a more compelling overall package for the average user. The improved responsiveness and reduced hand fatigue contribute significantly to a more satisfying and productive mobile experience. The newer processor and slightly better camera in the Moto G54 are also factors, but the user experience driven by the display and weight are the deciding factors for me.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.