Samsung Galaxy A23 vs Motorola Moto G42 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 25, 2022 June 28, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 106.84 cm³ 94.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 195 g 175 g
Height 165.4 mm 160.4 mm
Width 76.9 mm 73.5 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach
  • Atlantic Green
  • Metallic Rose

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.4 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 83.9 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 411 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 122.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.8 mAh/cm³ 53.01 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A23 vs. Motorola Moto G42: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones not just as lists of specs, but as tools that can enrich your daily life. Let's delve into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy A23 and Motorola Moto G42, focusing on the user experience.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A23Motorola Moto G42User Experience Impact
Interface DesignPLS LCD, 90HzAMOLEDThe A23's 90Hz refresh rate offers smoother scrolling, but the G42's AMOLED provides richer colors and deeper blacks for a more visually engaging experience.
Interaction FlowOne UIMy UXBoth offer clean Android experiences, but individual preferences for customization and bloatware will determine the preferred option.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard AndroidStandard AndroidBoth rely on standard Android accessibility features. Specific needs should be evaluated based on individual user requirements.
Design ErgonomicsLarger, heavierSlimmer, lighterThe G42's lighter weight and slimmer profile might be more comfortable for extended use and one-handed operation.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Imagine you're a student using your phone for note-taking, browsing social media, and streaming videos.

  • A23 Story: The A23's 90Hz display makes scrolling through lengthy articles and quickly jotting down notes a breeze. However, the LCD screen might appear washed out in direct sunlight during outdoor study sessions.

  • G42 Story: The G42's vibrant AMOLED screen brings your lecture videos to life, offering immersive visuals. Its lighter weight makes it easier to carry around campus all day. However, scrolling through social media feeds might feel less fluid compared to the A23.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

Both phones cater to a broad user base seeking reliable mid-range devices. However:

  • Users prioritizing smooth performance and responsiveness would appreciate the A23's 90Hz display.
  • Users who value vibrant visuals and a comfortable grip might prefer the G42's AMOLED screen and lighter design.
  • Users with specific accessibility needs should explore the built-in Android features on both devices and consider any personalized requirements.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Choosing between these phones hinges on your personal priorities:

  • Prioritize Performance and Responsiveness? A23
  • Prioritize Visual Quality and Comfort? G42

Don't just focus on numbers. Think about how you'll feel using the phone in your daily life.

My Choice: Motorola Moto G42

While the Samsung Galaxy A23's 90Hz refresh rate is tempting for smooth scrolling, I would choose the Motorola Moto G42. The AMOLED screen's superior visual quality is a significant factor for me, as I consume a lot of visual content. I also appreciate the G42's lighter and slimmer design, which contributes to a more comfortable user experience, especially during extended use. The slight trade-off in scrolling smoothness is acceptable considering the overall gains in visual immersion and portability. In the end, the G42 aligns better with my personal preferences for a vibrant, comfortable, and enjoyable mobile experience.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.