Samsung Galaxy A23 vs Motorola Moto E22 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 25, 2022 October 11, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 106.84 cm³ 97.77 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.85 "/g
Weight 195 g 169 g
Height 165.4 mm 163.6 mm
Width 76.9 mm 74.7 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach
  • Crystal Blue
  • Astro Black

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.5 % 83.5 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 95.15 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.8 mAh/cm³ 41.12 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4020 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Adreno 610 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A23 vs. Motorola Moto E22: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones not just as lists of specs, but as tools that fit into your life. Let's delve into a narrative-driven comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A23 and the Motorola Moto E22, focusing on the user experience.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A23Motorola Moto E22User Experience Impact
Interface DesignModern, clean One UIStock Android, minimalistA23 offers a more feature-rich, customizable experience; E22 provides a cleaner, potentially more intuitive interface.
Interaction FlowSmooth, 90Hz refresh rate90Hz refresh rate, potential lag due to processorA23 likely offers a consistently smoother experience.
Accessibility FeaturesOne UI's extensive customization optionsStandard Android accessibility featuresA23 allows greater personalization for users with diverse needs.
Design ErgonomicsSlightly heavier, largerLighter, more compactE22 might be more comfortable for one-handed use; A23 offers a larger screen for media consumption.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a student using your phone for note-taking, research, and casual gaming.

  • A23 Story: The A23's vibrant 6.6" Full HD+ display brings your notes to life. The Snapdragon 680 processor, while not a powerhouse, handles multitasking efficiently. You can seamlessly switch between research apps and jot down notes without frustrating slowdowns. The 5000mAh battery ensures you power through a full day of classes.

  • E22 Story: The E22's lighter weight makes it easy to carry around campus. While the 6.5" screen is ample for reading, the lower resolution (720p) might make detailed images and text appear less sharp. The Helio G37 processor is geared towards basic tasks; gaming performance might be limited. The 4020mAh battery requires more frequent charging.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For the Power User: The A23's superior processor, higher resolution display, and larger battery cater to users who demand more from their device.

  • For the Budget-Conscious User: The E22's lower price point makes it an attractive option for those prioritizing affordability.

  • For the Senior User: Both phones offer large screens for easy readability, but the E22's simpler interface and lighter weight might be preferable for less tech-savvy users.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Choosing between these phones depends on your priorities. If a smooth user experience, vibrant display, and long battery life are paramount, the A23 is the better choice. If affordability and ease of use are key, the E22 is a viable option.

My Choice: I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A23.

Why? While the Motorola Moto E22 offers a compelling price, the A23 provides a more well-rounded user experience. The sharper display, more powerful processor, and larger battery capacity significantly enhance daily use. The difference in price is justified by the noticeable improvements in performance, battery life, and overall quality of the user experience. The A23's design choices reflect a commitment to delivering a device that seamlessly integrates into a demanding user's lifestyle, making it the more compelling option for me. The slightly heavier weight is a minor trade-off for the significant benefits it offers.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.