Samsung Galaxy A22 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date July 1, 2021 June 5, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 98.49 cm³ 88.47 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 186 g 184.5 g
Height 159.3 mm 170.8 mm
Width 73.6 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Black
  • White
  • Violet
  • Mint
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.9 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.3 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 274 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness 600 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 122.07 mAh/in² 79.82 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.77 mAh/cm³ 42.95 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 13 16

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into this comparison between the Samsung Galaxy A22 and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. We've got a classic David-versus-Goliath scenario here: a budget-friendly workhorse versus a cutting-edge foldable powerhouse. Buckle up, because there are some significant differences!

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a breakdown of the key specs, presented in a way that highlights what they actually mean for you as a user:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A22Motorola Razr 40 UltraReal-World Implications
Design
Form FactorStandardFoldableRadically different experience. Razr 40 Ultra is pocketable when folded, a head-turner. A22 is traditional.
Dimensions159.3 × 73.6 × 8.4 mm170.8 × 74 × 7 mmRazr 40 Ultra is taller when unfolded but significantly thinner.
Weight186g184.5gNegligible difference. Both feel similar in hand in terms of weight.
Display
Size6.4"6.9"Razr 40 Ultra offers more screen real estate, great for media consumption and multitasking.
Resolution720x16001080x2640Razr 40 Ultra is much sharper, leading to clearer text and images.
PPI274413Noticeably crisper visuals on the Razr 40 Ultra.
TechnologyAMOLEDUnknown (Likely OLED)A22's AMOLED is vibrant with deep blacks, enhancing contrast and viewing experience.
Refresh Rate90Hz165HzRazr 40 Ultra provides incredibly smooth scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits1400 nitsRazr 40 Ultra is easily viewable in bright sunlight. A22’s brightness is unspecified, a potential concern.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80 (12 nm)Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)Razr 40 Ultra is significantly faster and more responsive, handling demanding apps and games with ease.
AnTuTu Score379,8001,238,000Razr 40 Ultra blows the A22 out of the water. Expect a smoother experience overall.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Adreno 730Razr 40 Ultra’s GPU is far more powerful, crucial for gaming and graphically intensive applications.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/1.812MP, f/1.5A22 has higher resolution, but Razr 40 Ultra has a wider aperture for better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera8MP, f/2.032MP, f/2.45Razr 40 Ultra captures much more detailed selfies.
Wide Angle Lens5MP13MP (Wide Angle + Macro)A22 has a dedicated wide-angle, while Razr 40 Ultra combines wide-angle with macro capabilities.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@60fps, 1080p@120fpsRazr 40 Ultra records higher quality, smoother video.
StabilizationDigital Image StabilizationDigital and Optical Image Stabilization (OIS)Razr 40 Ultra records higher quality, smoother video.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh3800mAhA22 has larger battery on paper, but the Razr's optimized chipset might compensate somewhat.
Charging15W30W, Wireless 8W, Reverse ChargingRazr 40 Ultra charges much faster and offers convenient wireless charging and the ability to charge other devices.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (Upgradable to 13)Android 13 (Upgradable to 16)Razr 40 Ultra has newer OS and promises longer software support.
StorageUnknown256GB/512GBRazr 40 Ultra offers ample storage, a must for media-heavy users. A22’s storage is unspecified, a potential issue.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone allows for storage expansion.

2. Key Insights

  • Samsung Galaxy A22 Strengths: Budget-friendly, potentially long battery life, AMOLED display (though brightness is a question mark).
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Strengths: Cutting-edge foldable design, stunning and smooth display, powerful performance, excellent camera capabilities, faster charging, and more future-proof software.
  • Trade-offs: The Razr 40 Ultra commands a much higher price tag. The A22 sacrifices performance and features for affordability. The Razr 40 Ultra has a smaller battery, which could impact battery life, especially with heavy usage.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy A22: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability, decent battery life, and a good-enough display for basic tasks. Suitable for students, first-time smartphone owners, or those who need a secondary device.
  • Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Best for tech enthusiasts, early adopters, and those who want a premium, head-turning device. Excels in media consumption, mobile gaming, photography, and productivity. Perfect for users who are willing to pay a premium for innovation and top-tier performance.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to help you decide:

  1. What's your budget? If you're on a tight budget, the A22 is the obvious choice. If you're willing to spend more for a premium experience, the Razr 40 Ultra is worth considering.
  2. How important is performance to you? If you need a phone that can handle demanding apps, games, and multitasking, the Razr 40 Ultra is the clear winner.
  3. Do you value innovation and a unique design? The Razr 40 Ultra's foldable design is a game-changer, offering a pocketable form factor and a conversation-starting aesthetic.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Budget Shopper: Go for the Samsung Galaxy A22. It's the most affordable option and will handle basic tasks without breaking the bank.
  • Mobile Gamer: The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the way to go. Its powerful processor and smooth display will provide a superior gaming experience.
  • Tech Enthusiast: The Razr 40 Ultra is a no-brainer. Its foldable design, cutting-edge features, and top-tier performance make it a standout device.

Personal Choice:

If I were making the decision (and had the budget), I would go with the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. I'm a tech enthusiast who appreciates innovation, and the foldable design is simply too intriguing to pass up. Beyond the novelty, the Razr 40 Ultra offers a superior display, much better performance, and a more premium camera experience. I understand the battery life might be a compromise compared to the A22, but I'm willing to manage that for the overall package. For me, the Razr 40 Ultra isn't just a phone; it's a statement piece that showcases the future of mobile technology.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.