Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Xiaomi Poco F4 GT - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 24, 2021 April 28, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 114.97 cm³ 105.94 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.25 "/g 3.18 "/g
Weight 203 g 210 g
Height 167.2 mm 162.5 mm
Width 76.4 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 9 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Violet
  • Gray
  • Mint
  • Stealth Black
  • Knight Silver
  • Cyber Yellow

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.3 % 86.2 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 105.64 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.49 mAh/cm³ 44.36 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13 13

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's break down the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT. I'll try to keep it simple and focus on what really matters to you, the user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a detailed comparison to give you a clear picture of what each phone brings to the table:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A22 5GXiaomi Poco F4 GTReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions167.2 × 76.4 × 9 mm, 203g162.5 × 76.7 × 8.5 mm, 210gThe A22 5G is slightly taller and thicker but lighter, while the F4 GT is wider and heavier. Expect the F4 GT to feel a bit more substantial, and the A22 5G to be slightly easier to handle due to its lower weight.
Display
Size6.6"6.67"Virtually identical screen size.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Sharpness will be similar on both.
TechnologyTFT LCDAMOLEDBig Difference: AMOLED offers far superior contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors. Makes a significant visual impact.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzSmoother scrolling and animations on the F4 GT, making it feel more responsive, especially in gaming.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm)Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm)Massive Difference: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is a flagship-level chip. Expect significantly faster performance in apps, games, and multitasking.
AnTuTu Score379,8001,178,365Quantifies the performance gap. The F4 GT will feel much snappier.
Camera
Main Camera48MP f/1.864MP f/1.73On paper, the F4 GT wins with higher resolution and a slightly wider aperture, potentially better low-light performance and more detailed photos.
Selfie Camera8MP f/2.020MP f/2.4Higher resolution selfies from the F4 GT.
Video1152p@30fps4K@60fpsThe F4 GT can record much higher quality videos, a big plus for content creators.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh4700mAhThe A22 5G has a slightly larger battery, but real-world battery life depends on usage and optimization.
Charging15W120WGame Changer: 120W charging is ridiculously fast. The F4 GT will charge from 0-100% in a fraction of the time compared to the A22 5G.
SoftwareAndroid 11, upgradeable to 13Android 12, upgradeable to 13Both can be upgraded to Android 13.
Other
Screen ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass VictusThe F4 GT offers significantly better screen protection against scratches and cracks.
AudioDolby Atmos, Dolby Digital PlusDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 3 microphonesF4 GT offers better overall audio.

2. Key Insights

  • Samsung Galaxy A22 5G:

    • Strengths: Larger battery, slightly lighter, cheaper.
    • Competitive Advantages: More affordable, good for basic usage and longer battery for less demanding tasks.
    • Trade-offs: Significantly weaker performance, inferior display, slower charging, and lower video recording capabilities.
  • Xiaomi Poco F4 GT:

    • Strengths: Flagship-level performance, excellent AMOLED display, blazing-fast charging, superior cameras, better build quality.
    • Competitive Advantages: High-end gaming, content creation, and anyone who values responsiveness and visual quality.
    • Trade-offs: More expensive, slightly heavier.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy A22 5G:

    • Best Suited For: Budget-conscious users, those who prioritize battery life over performance, and those with basic smartphone needs (calls, texts, social media).
    • Use Cases: Casual browsing, light social media, streaming music, and everyday communication.
  • Xiaomi Poco F4 GT:

    • Best Suited For: Gamers, content creators, power users who demand top-tier performance and a premium experience.
    • Use Cases: High-end gaming, 4K video recording, heavy multitasking, and anyone who wants the best possible responsiveness.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to help you decide:

  1. What's your budget? The A22 5G will be significantly cheaper.
  2. How important is performance? If you're a gamer or heavy user, the F4 GT is the clear winner.
  3. What do you value more: battery life or fast charging? The A22 5G has a slightly larger battery, but the F4 GT's 120W charging is a game-changer.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Budget is tight, and you only need a phone for basic tasks: Go for the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G.
  • Scenario 2: You're a gamer and want the best possible mobile gaming experience: The Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is the obvious choice.
  • Scenario 3: You want a phone that can do it all, with great performance and features: The Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is the better all-around device.

What Would I Choose?

For me, I'd pick the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT. I value performance, display quality, and camera capabilities above all else. I don't mind paying extra for a smoother, faster, and more enjoyable experience. Plus, that 120W charging is just too good to pass up – no more waiting around for my phone to charge! Yes, it's a bit pricier, but the difference in performance is night and day.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.