Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Motorola Moto G32 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 24, 2021 August 16, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 114.97 cm³ 101.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.25 "/g 3.53 "/g
Weight 203 g 184 g
Height 167.2 mm 161.8 mm
Width 76.4 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 9 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • White
  • Violet
  • Gray
  • Mint
  • Mineral Grey
  • Satin Silver
  • Rose Gold

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.3 % 85.4 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.49 mAh/cm³ 49.26 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13 13

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and the Motorola Moto G32. We'll break down the specs, dissect the real-world implications, and figure out which phone might be the better fit for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a detailed look at the key specifications and what they mean for everyday use:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A22 5GMotorola Moto G32Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions167.2 x 76.4 x 9 mm161.8 x 73.8 x 8.5 mmA22 5G is larger, possibly less pocket-friendly.
Weight203g184gMoto G32 is lighter, more comfortable for prolonged use.
Display
Size6.6"6.5"Negligible difference; both offer ample screen real estate.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Sharp and clear images on both.
TechnologyTFT LCDIPS LCDMoto G32: Better viewing angles, more vibrant colors likely.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzSmooth scrolling and animations on both.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsInaccurate data.
Performance
ChipsetDimensity 700 (7nm)Snapdragon 680 (6nm)A22 5G: More powerful, better for gaming and demanding apps.
AnTuTu Score379,800249,000A22 5G: Noticeably faster performance overall.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 610A22 5G: Better graphics capabilities.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/1.8, 1/2"50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76"Moto G32: Higher resolution, but A22 5G has larger sensor.
Selfie Camera8MP, f/2.016MP, f/2.2Moto G32: Higher resolution selfies.
Wide Angle Lens5MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.0Moto G32: Higher resolution and wider aperture.
Depth Camera5MPNoneA22 5G: Dedicated depth sensor for better portrait mode.
Macro LensNone2MP, f/2.4Moto G32: Dedicated macro lens.
Video1152p@30fps1080p@30fpsA22 5G: Slightly higher video resolution.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery life.
Charging15W30WMoto G32: Significantly faster charging.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (up to 13)Android 12 (up to 13)Moto G32: More up-to-date out of the box.
Storage
Internal64/128 GB64/128/256 GBMoto G32: Option for more internal storage.
ExpandableNoNoNo expandable storage on either.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Dolby Digital PlusDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphonesMoto G32: Stereo speakers.

2. Key Insights

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G:

  • Strengths: Significantly better performance due to the Dimensity 700 chipset, potentially better main camera image quality (larger sensor), and a dedicated depth sensor for portraits.
  • Competitive Advantages: 5G connectivity (vs 4G on the Moto G32), stronger processing power.
  • Trade-offs: Slower charging, larger and heavier, older Android version out of the box.

Motorola Moto G32:

  • Strengths: Lighter and more compact design, faster charging, more up-to-date Android version, higher resolution selfie camera, and stereo speakers.
  • Competitive Advantages: Potentially better display (IPS LCD), macro lens.
  • Trade-offs: Weaker performance compared to the A22 5G.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy A22 5G: Best for users who prioritize performance and gaming on a budget. The Dimensity 700 chipset offers a significant boost for demanding tasks. Also, it's a good choice if 5G is a must-have.
  • Motorola Moto G32: Ideal for users who value a more streamlined experience, faster charging, and a lighter phone. The more up-to-date Android version and focus on multimedia (stereo speakers) are also attractive.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to help you decide:

  1. How important is performance? If you play demanding games or need a snappy experience with multiple apps, the A22 5G is the better choice.
  2. Do you prefer a lighter, more compact phone, or a larger screen? The Moto G32 is easier to handle, while the A22 5G offers slightly more screen real estate.
  3. How crucial is fast charging? The Moto G32 charges much quicker, which can be a significant convenience.

Which One Would I Choose?

Personally, I would lean towards the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G. While the Motorola Moto G32 has its merits, the performance difference is significant. As a tech journalist, I often find myself multitasking and running demanding apps, so the extra horsepower of the Dimensity 700 chipset would be beneficial. While the slower charging and larger size are drawbacks, the performance gain outweighs those for my specific use case. If I were primarily concerned with media consumption and ease of handling, the Moto G32 would be a more compelling option. However, when I consider the importance of performance the Samsung is the best option.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.