Samsung Galaxy A15 5G vs Motorola Moto G55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date December 16, 2023 September 6, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.28 cm³ 96.6 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.25 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 200 g 179 g
Height 160.1 mm 161.6 mm
Width 76.8 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Magical Blue
  • Personality Yellow
  • Forest Grey
  • Smoky Green
  • Twilight Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.49 "
Resolution 1080 x 2340 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.3 % 85.3 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 800 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 118.71 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.41 mAh/cm³ 51.76 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A15 5G vs. Motorola Moto G55: A Holistic Analysis

As a technology researcher, my analysis goes beyond a simple spec comparison. I aim to provide a holistic understanding of these devices within the broader mobile technology landscape.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A15 5GMotorola Moto G55Technological ContextInnovation PotentialEcosystem IntegrationPerformance MetricsUser Experience Indicators
Launch Date2023-12-162024-09-06Indicates market timing and potential integration of newer technologiesLowMediumLowMedium
Display6.5" Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits6.49" IPS LCD, 120HzDisplay technology impacts visual quality and power consumptionMediumMediumMediumHigh
Resolution1080x23401080x2400Screen sharpness and detailLowLowLowMedium
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm)Processing power and efficiency significantly influence performanceMediumHighHighHigh
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz A76, 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz A78, 6x2.0 GHz A55)Core architecture affects multitasking and application speedMediumHighHighHigh
GPUMali-G57 MC2IMG BXM-8-256Graphics processing capability crucial for gaming and multimediaLowMediumMediumMedium
RAM/StorageUp to 256GB/8GB256GB/8GBMemory and storage capacity impact multitasking and data handlingLowLowMediumHigh
OSAndroid 14 / Up to Android 17Android 14Operating system updates and longevity are key user considerationsHighHighMediumHigh
Battery5000 mAh5000 mAhBattery life is a critical factor for mobile device usabilityLowLowLowHigh
Camera (Video)1080p@30fps (EIS)1080p@30/60fpsVideo recording capabilities are increasingly importantLowLowLowMedium

2. Strategic Technological Insights

  • Processor Performance: The Moto G55 boasts a slightly more powerful CPU with Cortex-A78 cores, promising better performance in demanding tasks. This reflects the trend of increasing mobile processing power.
  • Display Technology: The A15 5G's Super AMOLED display offers vibrant colors and deeper blacks, but the Moto G55's 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations, reflecting the growing importance of high refresh rate displays. The choice between visual quality and smoothness is a key differentiator in the mid-range market.
  • Software Updates: Samsung's commitment to longer OS updates for the A15 5G (up to Android 17) is a significant advantage, aligning with the growing demand for device longevity and security.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment

Both devices cater to the mid-range market, offering a balance of features and affordability. The A15 5G, with its AMOLED display and potential for longer software updates, might appeal to users prioritizing visual experience and long-term usability. The Moto G55, with its faster processor and 120Hz refresh rate, could attract users focused on performance and smooth interactions.

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework

  • 5G Adoption: The A15 5G's 5G capability positions it well for future network advancements, offering faster speeds and lower latency.
  • Sustainable Technology: Both devices use 6nm chipsets, reflecting a broader trend toward energy-efficient mobile technology.

My Choice: Motorola Moto G55

While the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G offers a compelling package with its AMOLED display and longer software support, I would choose the Motorola Moto G55. The deciding factors are the more powerful processor (Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 7025) and the smoother 120Hz display. As a technology enthusiast, I value performance and responsiveness. The slight edge in processing power and the significantly smoother display of the Moto G55 would provide a more enjoyable user experience in day-to-day tasks, gaming, and media consumption. While the A15 5G's longer software update promise is attractive, the performance gains of the G55 outweigh that benefit for my personal use case. Furthermore, the advancements in chipset technology within a year (Dimensity 6100+ to 7025) suggests a more optimized performance and potentially better battery efficiency.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.