Samsung Galaxy A14 vs Xiaomi Redmi A3x - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 27, 2023 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 119.03 cm³ 106.65 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.28 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 201 g 193 g
Height 167.7 mm 168.4 mm
Width 78 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Green
  • Dark Red
  • Midnight Black
  • Olive Green
  • Moonlight White (Starry White)
  • Aurora Green (Ocean Green)

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.71 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 80.2 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.05 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42 mAh/cm³ 46.88 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version A Unisoc T603 (22 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version A Octa-core 1.8 GHz
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 8

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A14Xiaomi Redmi A3xPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.7 x 78 x 9.1168.4 x 76.3 x 8.3Redmi A3x is slightly thinner and lighter. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)201193Redmi A3x is slightly lighter, but the difference is minimal.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.71A3x has a marginally larger screen.
Resolution (px)1080 x 2408720 x 1650A14 has a significantly sharper display (400 ppi vs 268 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified90A3x's 90Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations compared to A14's standard 60Hz (assumed).
Display TypePLS LCDIPS LCDBoth are LCD panels. PLS LCD generally offers slightly better color reproduction and viewing angles than standard IPS LCD.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80 (12 nm)Unisoc T603 (22 nm)The Helio G80 in the A14 is generally considered more powerful than the Unisoc T603, resulting in better gaming and multitasking performance.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core 1.8 GHzA14 has faster clock speeds and a more powerful CPU architecture, leading to noticeable performance advantages.
RAM (GB)44/3 (version dependent)4GB RAM is sufficient for basic tasks on both phones.
OSAndroid 13Android 14A3x ships with a newer Android version, potentially offering newer features and longer software support. However, A14's maximum supported version is unspecified.
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)50 + 2 + 28 + 0.1A14 boasts a higher resolution main sensor (50MP vs 8MP), potentially capturing more detail in photos. A3x's secondary "0.1MP" camera is practically useless.
Front Camera (MP)135A14 has a significantly higher resolution front camera for better selfies.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Both have the same battery capacity.
Fast Charging15W10WA14 supports faster charging.
Other
NFCYesNoA14 supports NFC for contactless payments and other functionalities.
PriceMediumLowA3x is more budget-friendly.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A14 Advantages:

  • Significantly better display: Higher resolution and potentially better color reproduction.
  • More powerful performance: Faster processor and GPU for smoother multitasking and gaming.
  • Higher resolution cameras: Better photo and video quality.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments.
  • Faster Charging: Reduces charging time.

Xiaomi Redmi A3x Advantages:

  • Lower price: More affordable option.
  • Newer Android version: Potentially longer software support and access to newer features.
  • Higher Refresh Rate: Smoother user interface experience.
  • Lighter and slimmer design: More comfortable to hold (marginally).

Trade-offs:

  • A14 sacrifices a high refresh rate display and a newer Android OS for better performance and camera quality.
  • A3x compromises performance, display sharpness, camera quality, and features like NFC for a lower price point.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A14: Suitable for users who prioritize performance, display quality, camera capabilities, and features like NFC. Ideal for moderate gaming, media consumption, and mobile photography.

Xiaomi Redmi A3x: Best suited for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media. Suitable for users who prioritize battery life and a smooth user interface over raw performance.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? If price is a major constraint, the Redmi A3x is the more affordable choice.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? For demanding tasks, gaming, or photography, the A14 is better equipped. For basic usage, the A3x is sufficient.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize features like NFC, display quality, camera performance, or a newer OS version to guide your decision.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A14

While the Redmi A3x offers a compelling price point, the Samsung Galaxy A14's superior display, performance, camera system, and NFC capability make it a more well-rounded device. The sharper display and faster processor will provide a noticeably better user experience in day-to-day tasks, while the inclusion of NFC offers convenient contactless payment options. Although the A3x has a higher refresh rate screen and newer Android version, the performance and display resolution differences are significant enough to impact daily usage. The price difference is justifiable for the substantial increase in overall quality and features. For the majority of users, the A14 represents a better long-term investment.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.