Samsung Galaxy A14 vs Xiaomi Redmi 14C - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 27, 2023 August 30, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 119.03 cm³ 109.67 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.28 "/g 3.26 "/g
Weight 201 g 211 g
Height 167.7 mm 171.9 mm
Width 78 mm 77.8 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Green
  • Dark Red
  • Midnight Black
  • Starry Blue
  • Sage Green
  • Dreamy Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.88 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 80.2 % 84 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 109.01 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42 mAh/cm³ 47.05 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5160 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version A Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version A Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A14Xiaomi Redmi 14CPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.7 x 78 x 9.1171.9 x 77.8 x 8.2Redmi 14C is slightly larger and thinner.
Weight (g)201211Negligible weight difference in practical use.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.88Redmi 14C offers a larger screen for media consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 2408720 x 1640A14 has a significantly sharper display (400 vs 260 ppi). Text and images will be clearer.
Display TypePLS LCDIPS LCDBoth are LCDs, but PLS generally offers slightly better color reproduction and viewing angles than standard IPS.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified120Redmi 14C's 120Hz refresh rate will result in smoother scrolling and animations, providing a more fluid user experience.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80Mediatek Helio G81 UltraG81 Ultra offers a slight performance boost over the G80, but the difference might not be noticeable in everyday tasks.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Similar CPU configurations suggest comparable processing power.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G52 MC2Identical GPUs suggest similar graphics performance.
RAM (GB)44/6/8 (depending on variant)Redmi offers configurations with more RAM, beneficial for multitasking and demanding applications.
OSAndroid 13Android 14Redmi 14C ships with a newer Android version, offering potential feature and security advantages.
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)50 + 2 + 250 + 0.8A14 has a dedicated macro and depth sensor, while Redmi 14C's secondary lens is a low-resolution depth sensor with limited practical use. A14 likely offers a more versatile camera system.
Front Camera (MP)1313Similar front camera resolution.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005160Redmi 14C has a slightly larger battery capacity, potentially offering marginally longer battery life.
Fast Charging15W18WRedmi 14C supports slightly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A14 Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: Significantly higher pixel density resulting in clearer visuals.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Dedicated macro and depth sensors offer more shooting options.

Xiaomi Redmi 14C Advantages:

  • Larger Display: Better for media consumption and gaming.
  • Higher Refresh Rate: Smoother and more responsive user experience.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • Faster Charging: Reduced charging times.
  • Newer Android Version: Access to newer features and security updates.
  • More RAM Options: Configurations with higher RAM available for improved multitasking.

Trade-offs:

  • Redmi 14C: Larger display with lower resolution results in a less sharp image.
  • A14: Smaller display but with a sharper image.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A14: Users prioritizing display sharpness, camera versatility, and a compact form factor. Suitable for everyday tasks, social media, and casual photography.

Xiaomi Redmi 14C: Users prioritizing a large display, smooth performance, long battery life, and the latest Android features. Ideal for media consumption, gaming, and extended use without frequent charging.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Display Priority: Do you prioritize screen size or sharpness?
  2. Performance Needs: Do you require a high refresh rate display and extra RAM for multitasking?
  3. Budget Constraints: Which phone offers the best value for your budget considering its features?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy Media Consumer: Redmi 14C due to its larger display and higher refresh rate.
  • Photography Enthusiast: A14 due to its more versatile camera system.
  • Budget-Conscious User: Both phones fall in the medium price range. The best option depends on specific feature prioritization and available deals.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A14

While the Redmi 14C offers a larger display, faster refresh rate, and slightly bigger battery, the significantly sharper display of the A14 is a crucial factor for me. I value clarity and detail in visuals, especially for reading text and browsing images. The more versatile camera system of the A14 is also a significant advantage. The slightly smaller screen and older Android version are trade-offs I am willing to accept for the superior display quality and camera versatility. The performance difference between the two chipsets is likely negligible for my usage patterns. Ultimately, the A14 provides a better balance of features that align with my personal preferences.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.