Samsung Galaxy A14 vs vivo X100 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo X100
vivo X100
Vivo

General

Launch Date March 27, 2023 November 21, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 119.03 cm³ 104.89 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.28 "/g 3.36 "/g
Weight 201 g 202 g
Height 167.7 mm 164.1 mm
Width 78 mm 75.2 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Green
  • Dark Red
  • White
  • Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 80.2 % 89.9 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 452 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 108.77 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42 mAh/cm³ 47.67 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version A Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version A Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Immortalis-G720 MC12

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A14vivo X100Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.7 x 78 x 9.1164.1 x 75.2 x 8.5Vivo X100 is slightly smaller and thinner, making it potentially more pocketable.
Weight (g)201202Negligible weight difference.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without material information.
Display
Display TypePLS LCDLTPO AMOLEDVivo X100's AMOLED offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better power efficiency due to LTPO.
Size (inches)6.66.78Vivo X100 has a slightly larger display.
Resolution1080 x 24081260 x 2800Vivo X100 has a sharper display with higher pixel density (452 ppi vs 400 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh RateNot specified120HzVivo X100's 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations, leading to a more fluid user experience. A14's refresh rate is unknown but likely 60Hz.
Peak BrightnessNot specified3000 nitsVivo X100 should offer significantly better visibility in bright sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80 (12nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4nm)Vivo X100's Dimensity 9300 is significantly more powerful and efficient due to its advanced 4nm process, resulting in faster performance, smoother multitasking, and better battery life.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)Vivo X100 has a much more powerful CPU architecture, leading to a substantial performance advantage in demanding tasks and applications.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Immortalis-G720 MC12Vivo X100's GPU is considerably more powerful, providing a much better gaming and graphics-intensive application experience.
RAM4GB16GBVivo X100 offers vastly more RAM, enabling significantly better multitasking and preventing apps from closing in the background.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MP (Sony IMX920)While both have 50MP main sensors, the Vivo X100 utilizes a larger, more advanced sensor (Sony IMX920 with 1.57 aperture vs. 1.8 on A14), likely resulting in superior low-light performance and image quality.
Other CamerasMacro, Depth, SelfieWide, Telephoto, SelfieVivo X100 offers more versatile camera options with a wide-angle and a telephoto lens, enabling broader perspectives and optical zoom capabilities.
Video Capabilities1080p@30fpsNot specifiedSamsung A14 records video at 1080p 30fps. Vivo X100's video capabilities are not listed, preventing a complete comparison.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhBoth phones have the same battery capacity.
Fast Charging15W120WVivo X100 offers significantly faster charging, dramatically reducing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Vivo X100 Advantages:

  • Significantly superior performance: The Dimensity 9300 chipset, powerful GPU, and ample RAM provide a vastly smoother and faster user experience.
  • Higher quality display: The AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate and higher resolution offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and smoother animations.
  • More versatile camera system: The inclusion of wide-angle and telephoto lenses allows for greater creative freedom in photography.
  • Much faster charging: 120W fast charging minimizes downtime significantly.

Samsung Galaxy A14 Advantages:

  • Potentially lower price: While not explicitly stated, the A14 likely falls into a lower price bracket than the X100 given the overall specifications.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Vivo X100: Users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, versatile camera capabilities, and fast charging. Suitable for demanding tasks like gaming, content creation, and multitasking.

Samsung Galaxy A14: Budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Vivo X100 is likely considerably more expensive.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the A14 might suffice. For demanding tasks, the X100 is necessary.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize performance, display, camera, or battery life based on your needs.

My Choice: Vivo X100

While the price difference is likely significant, the Vivo X100 offers a substantial upgrade in almost every aspect. The superior performance, stunning display, versatile camera system, and incredibly fast charging make it a compelling choice. For me, the long-term benefits of a smoother, faster, and more enjoyable user experience outweigh the potential cost savings of the Samsung Galaxy A14. The X100's future-proof specifications also ensure its relevance for a longer period. The A14 might be suitable for extremely budget-conscious users with basic needs, but the X100 provides a significantly better overall experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.