Samsung Galaxy A14 vs vivo iQOO 12 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 27, 2023 November 14, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 119.03 cm³ 100.33 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.28 "/g 3.42 "/g
Weight 201 g 198.5 g
Height 167.7 mm 163.2 mm
Width 78 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Green
  • Dark Red
  • Black
  • Red
  • White (BMW M branding)

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 80.2 % 89.6 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 453 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1400 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 108.77 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42 mAh/cm³ 49.83 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version A Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version A Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A14vivo iQOO 12Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.7 x 78 x 9.1163.2 x 75.9 x 8.1iQOO 12 is slightly smaller and thinner, potentially improving one-handed use.
Weight (g)201198.5Negligible weight difference.
Display
Display TypePLS LCDLTPO AMOLEDiQOO 12's AMOLED offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better power efficiency due to LTPO.
Display Size (inches)6.66.78iQOO 12 has a slightly larger display.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24081260 x 2800iQOO 12 boasts a sharper display with higher resolution.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified144iQOO 12's 144Hz refresh rate provides significantly smoother scrolling and animations. A14's refresh rate is unknown, but likely 60Hz, resulting in a less fluid experience.
Peak Brightness (nits)Not specified3000iQOO 12 will be significantly more visible in direct sunlight. A14's peak brightness is unknown but expected to be much lower.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80 (12nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm)iQOO 12's Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers drastically superior performance and power efficiency due to the advanced 4nm process.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)iQOO 12's CPU architecture is significantly more powerful, enabling faster multitasking and demanding application usage.
RAM (GB)4/612/16iQOO 12 offers substantially more RAM, allowing for significantly better multitasking and preventing app closures in the background.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Similar megapixel count, but sensor quality and other features likely differ significantly.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 8K@30fpsiQOO 12 provides far superior video recording capabilities, including higher resolution and frame rates.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity.
Fast Charging (W)15120iQOO 12's 120W fast charging dramatically reduces charging time compared to A14's 15W.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A14 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: While exact pricing isn't provided, the A14 is likely significantly cheaper.

vivo iQOO 12 Advantages:

  • Significantly Higher Performance: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, coupled with ample RAM, delivers a vastly superior user experience for demanding tasks, gaming, and multitasking.
  • Superior Display: The LTPO AMOLED with 144Hz refresh rate provides smoother visuals, vibrant colors, and better power efficiency.
  • Faster Charging: 120W fast charging significantly reduces downtime.
  • Better Camera Capabilities: While detailed sensor specifications aren't complete, the iQOO 12 offers higher resolution video recording and features like optical image stabilization, suggesting superior overall camera performance.

Trade-offs:

  • The iQOO 12's advanced features come at a significantly higher price.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A14: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality: calling, texting, social media browsing, and light app usage.

vivo iQOO 12: Users who demand top-tier performance, a premium display, fast charging, and advanced camera features. Ideal for mobile gamers, power users, and content creators.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The A14 is a budget-friendly option, while the iQOO 12 is a premium device.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the A14 suffices. For demanding applications and gaming, the iQOO 12 is necessary.
  3. How important are display quality and refresh rate? The iQOO 12 offers a significantly superior visual experience.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Usage: Samsung Galaxy A14
  • Demanding User, High Budget: vivo iQOO 12
  • Moderate Budget, Desire for Good Display: Consider other options in the mid-range segment with AMOLED displays and decent performance.

My Choice: vivo iQOO 12

While significantly more expensive, the vivo iQOO 12 offers a vastly superior user experience across the board. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 provides future-proof performance, the 144Hz LTPO AMOLED display is stunning, and 120W fast charging is incredibly convenient. As someone who values a smooth and responsive experience, the iQOO 12's performance and display are compelling. The significant jump in capabilities justifies the price premium for me.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.