Samsung Galaxy A14 vs Tecno Spark Go 2024 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 27, 2023 December 7, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 119.03 cm³ 106.43 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.28 "/g N/A
Weight 201 g 0 g
Height 167.7 mm 163.7 mm
Width 78 mm 75.6 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Green
  • Dark Red
  • Mystery White
  • Alpenglow Gold
  • Magic Skin
  • Gravity Black

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 80.2 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42 mAh/cm³ 46.98 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version A Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version A Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A14Tecno Spark Go 2024Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.7 x 78 x 9.1163.7 x 75.6 x 8.6Spark Go 2024 is slightly smaller and potentially easier to handle.
Weight (g)2010 (Missing data - cannot compare)Weight significantly impacts comfort; information needed for Spark Go 2024.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.6Same screen size.
Resolution (pixels)1080 x 2408720 x 1612A14 has a significantly sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images. Spark Go's lower resolution might appear pixelated.
Display TypePLS LCDIPS LCDBoth are LCD panels. PLS LCD generally offers slightly better color reproduction and viewing angles than standard IPS.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified90A higher refresh rate on Spark Go 2024 means smoother scrolling and animations, though impact depends on A14's unspecified refresh rate.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80 (12nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Both are entry-level chipsets. Performance differences likely negligible for basic tasks, but noticeable for demanding games or multitasking. Benchmark comparisons needed for definitive analysis.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)A14 has slightly faster CPU cores, potentially offering a slight edge in performance.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G57 MP1G57 is generally a more modern and powerful GPU architecture than the G52. Spark Go might offer slightly better gaming performance, but comprehensive comparisons are necessary.
RAM4GB/6GB3GB/4GBMore RAM (6GB on A14) enables smoother multitasking and handling more apps in the background.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5013A14 has a much higher resolution main camera, likely capturing more detail and offering better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera (MP)138A14 boasts a higher resolution selfie camera, resulting in potentially better quality self-portraits.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth record video at the same resolution and frame rate.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity, expected similar battery life, though real-world usage varies greatly.
Fast Charging15W10WA14 supports slightly faster charging, reducing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A14 Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: Significantly higher resolution for a clearer viewing experience.
  • Higher Resolution Cameras: Potentially better image quality, especially in low light.
  • Slightly Faster CPU: Could provide a minor performance advantage in some tasks.
  • Faster Charging: Reduces charging time.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and data transfer.

Tecno Spark Go 2024 Advantages:

  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother scrolling and animations (depending on A14's unspecified refresh rate).
  • Potentially Better GPU: Mali-G57 architecture is generally more powerful for gaming.
  • Slightly Smaller Form Factor: Could be more comfortable for one-handed use (depending on weight).

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A14: Users who prioritize display quality, camera performance, and NFC functionality for mobile payments. Suitable for:

  • Content Consumption: Watching videos, browsing photos, social media.
  • Casual Photography: Capturing everyday moments, selfies.
  • Mobile Payments: Using contactless payment methods.

Tecno Spark Go 2024: Budget-conscious users who prioritize smooth display performance and potentially better gaming capabilities. Suitable for:

  • Casual Gaming: Playing less demanding mobile games.
  • Basic Tasks: Browsing, messaging, calling.
  • Users on a Tight Budget: Seeking the most affordable option.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? Spark Go 2024 is likely cheaper.
  2. Is display sharpness or smoothness more important to you? A14 for sharpness, Spark Go 2024 for potential smoothness (depending on A14's refresh rate).
  3. Do you frequently use mobile payments? A14 is the only option with NFC.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget & Basic Usage: Tecno Spark Go 2024
  • Emphasis on Display & Camera: Samsung Galaxy A14

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A14

While the Tecno Spark Go 2024 offers a potentially smoother display and better GPU, the Samsung Galaxy A14's significantly sharper display, higher resolution cameras, NFC functionality, and faster charging outweigh those advantages for me. The missing weight information for the Spark Go 2024 makes a comprehensive comparison difficult, but the A14's confirmed specifications provide a more compelling overall package for my needs. I prioritize a clear and crisp display for content consumption and appreciate the convenience of NFC for mobile payments. The slightly faster CPU and charging speed are also welcome bonuses. The A14 seems to be a more well-rounded device offering better value for the likely slightly higher price.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.