Samsung Galaxy A14 vs Realme Note 50 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 27, 2023 January 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 119.03 cm³ 102.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.28 "/g 3.62 "/g
Weight 201 g 186 g
Height 167.7 mm 167.2 mm
Width 78 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Green
  • Dark Red
  • Midnight Black
  • Sky Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 80.2 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 560 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42 mAh/cm³ 48.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version A Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version A Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A14Realme Note 50Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.7 x 78 x 9.1167.2 x 76.7 x 8Realme Note 50 is slightly thinner and lighter.
Weight (g)201186Noticeable difference in hand feel; Realme will feel less bulky.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality without more information.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.74Realme has a slightly larger screen.
Resolution (px)1080 x 2408720 x 1600Samsung has a significantly sharper display (400 ppi vs 260 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Display TypePLS LCDIPS LCDBoth are LCD panels, but PLS LCD generally offers slightly better color accuracy and viewing angles compared to standard IPS.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified90Realme's 90Hz display will provide smoother scrolling and animations. A higher refresh rate on the Samsung would need to be confirmed.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80 (12 nm)Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)Both are entry-level chipsets, performance differences likely negligible for everyday tasks. Benchmarks would be needed for detailed comparison.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Samsung has slightly faster CPU cores, potentially providing a slight edge in demanding applications.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G57Realme's Mali-G57 GPU likely offers better graphical performance.
RAM4GB3/4GB4GB RAM variant of both phones will offer similar multitasking capabilities. The 3GB RAM on the Realme could be limiting.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP Main, 2MP Macro, 2MP Depth13MP Main, 2MP B&WSamsung offers a higher resolution main camera, potentially capturing more detail. Realme's B&W sensor's practical benefit is unclear.
Front Camera13MP5MPSamsung has a significantly higher resolution front camera for better selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth offer basic video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity, expected battery life will depend more on software optimization and usage patterns.
Fast Charging15W10WSamsung offers slightly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A14 Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: Significantly higher resolution for clearer visuals.
  • Higher Resolution Cameras: Front and rear cameras capture more detail.
  • Slightly Faster CPU: Potentially better performance in demanding tasks.
  • Faster Charging: 15W vs 10W.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other NFC functionalities.

Realme Note 50 Advantages:

  • Larger Display: More screen real estate for media consumption.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother scrolling and animations (assuming Samsung is standard 60Hz).
  • Potentially Better GPU: Could offer smoother gaming.
  • Lighter and Thinner: More comfortable to hold and carry.
  • Lower Price: Falls into a lower price bracket.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A14: Users who prioritize display quality, camera performance, and NFC functionality. Suitable for:

  • Photography enthusiasts: Higher resolution cameras for better photos.
  • Content consumers: Sharper display for enjoying videos and images.
  • Users reliant on contactless payments: NFC for mobile payments and other applications.

Realme Note 50: Budget-conscious users who prioritize a large display and smooth performance. Suitable for:

  • Casual users: Basic smartphone needs with a focus on affordability.
  • Media consumers on a budget: Large screen for video watching.
  • Gamers on a tight budget: Potentially better GPU performance for the price point.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Realme Note 50 is more affordable.
  2. Is display quality or size more important? Samsung offers sharpness, Realme offers size and refresh rate.
  3. Do you need NFC for contactless payments? Only the Samsung Galaxy A14 offers NFC.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A14

While the Realme Note 50 offers a larger display and smoother refresh rate, the Samsung Galaxy A14's significantly sharper display, better camera system, slightly faster processor, NFC functionality, and faster charging make it a more well-rounded device for my needs. I prioritize display quality and camera performance, and the A14 excels in those areas. The slightly higher price is justified by the noticeable improvements in these key areas. While the Realme is a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers, the A14 offers a better overall user experience in my opinion.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.