Samsung Galaxy A14 vs Realme C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C65
Realme C65
Realme

General

Launch Date March 27, 2023 April 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 119.03 cm³ 95.2 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.28 "/g 3.61 "/g
Weight 201 g 185 g
Height 167.7 mm 164.6 mm
Width 78 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Green
  • Dark Red
  • Purple Nebula
  • Black Milky Way

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1604
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 80.2 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 264 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 625 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42 mAh/cm³ 52.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version A Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version A Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A14Realme C65Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.7 x 78 x 9.1164.6 x 76.1 x 7.6Realme C65 is slightly smaller and thinner, making it potentially more pocketable.
Weight (g)201185Realme C65 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.67Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (px)1080 x 2408720 x 1604Galaxy A14 has a significantly sharper display (400 ppi vs 264 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified90Realme C65's 90Hz refresh rate provides smoother animations and scrolling compared to the standard 60Hz expected on the A14 (though not confirmed). This results in a more fluid and responsive user experience.
Display TypePLS LCDIPS LCDBoth are LCD panels; PLS LCD generally offers slightly better color reproduction and viewing angles than standard IPS, but the difference is often subtle.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80Mediatek Helio G85Both chipsets offer similar performance, though the G85 has a slightly higher clocked GPU, potentially offering a minor advantage in gaming. Real-world differences might be minimal.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Identical CPU configurations suggest comparable processing power for everyday tasks.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G52 MC2Identical GPUs, however the Realme C65's GPU is clocked at 950MHz, providing a slight performance advantage for gaming.
RAM4GB (reviewed model)6/8GBRealme C65 offers more RAM in its available configurations, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps open. The reviewed A14 model has only 4GB.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Similar resolution; image quality will depend on sensor size, aperture, and software processing - details not fully provided for comparison.
Front Camera (MP)138Galaxy A14 boasts a higher resolution front camera for potentially better selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth offer similar video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacities suggest similar battery life, though actual usage will vary depending on software optimization and user habits.
Fast Charging15W45WRealme C65 supports significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A14 Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: The higher resolution display provides a more visually appealing experience.
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: Potentially better quality selfies.

Realme C65 Advantages:

  • Smoother Display: The 90Hz refresh rate provides a noticeable improvement in fluidity.
  • More RAM: Better multitasking capabilities and smoother performance.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly reduced charging times.
  • Lighter and Slimmer: More comfortable to hold and carry.
  • Slightly Faster GPU: Offers a minor advantage for gaming.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A14: Users who prioritize display sharpness and consume lots of media will appreciate the higher resolution screen.

Realme C65: Users who value a smooth and responsive user experience, fast charging, and better multitasking capabilities will prefer the Realme C65. Gamers might also appreciate the slightly faster GPU.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is display sharpness or smoothness more important to you?
  2. How important is fast charging?
  3. What is your budget and which configuration offers the best value for the price?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy Media Consumer: Galaxy A14 if budget is very tight.
  • Gamer on a Budget: Realme C65 due to the faster refresh rate and GPU.
  • Power User: Realme C65 for better multitasking and fast charging.

My Choice: Realme C65

While the sharper display of the Samsung Galaxy A14 is appealing, the Realme C65 offers a more well-rounded package. The 90Hz refresh rate significantly enhances daily use, making interactions feel smoother and more responsive. The faster charging is a major convenience, and the extra RAM ensures smoother performance in the long run. The slightly faster GPU also gives the Realme C65 a slight edge in gaming performance. While the lower resolution display is a trade-off, the overall user experience benefits offered by the Realme C65 outweigh this single disadvantage for me.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.