Samsung Galaxy A14 vs Realme C51 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C51
Realme C51
Realme

General

Launch Date March 27, 2023 August 1, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 119.03 cm³ 102.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.28 "/g 3.62 "/g
Weight 201 g 186 g
Height 167.7 mm 167.2 mm
Width 78 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Green
  • Dark Red
  • Mint Green
  • Carbon Black

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 80.2 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 560 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42 mAh/cm³ 48.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version A Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version A Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A14Realme C51Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.7 x 78 x 9.1167.2 x 76.7 x 8Realme C51 is slightly thinner and lighter. Negligible difference in everyday use.
Weight (g)201186Realme C51 is slightly lighter, enhancing one-handed usage.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.74Realme C51 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution1080 x 2408720 x 1600Galaxy A14 has a significantly sharper display (400 ppi vs 260 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh RateUnspecified90HzRealme C51's 90Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations, leading to a more fluid user experience. A14's unspecified refresh rate is likely 60Hz, which is standard but less smooth.
Display TypePLS LCDIPS LCDBoth are LCD panels with similar color reproduction. PLS LCD generally offers slightly better viewing angles.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80Unisoc Tiger T612Both are entry-level chipsets. Performance differences are minor, sufficient for basic tasks but may struggle with demanding games or multitasking.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Galaxy A14 has slightly faster cores, potentially offering a slight edge in performance, though real-world difference might be minimal.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G57Mali-G57 is generally considered a more powerful GPU than the Mali-G52 MC2; this translates to potentially better gaming performance on the Realme C51.
RAM4GB4GBBoth phones have the same RAM, meaning similar multitasking capabilities.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPMegapixel count is the same, but image quality depends on sensor size and processing, which is not fully detailed. Realme C51 provides more sensor details, suggesting potentially better low-light performance due to pixel binning.
Front Camera13MP5MPGalaxy A14 boasts a higher resolution front camera for potentially better selfies.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacity, suggesting similar battery life.
Fast Charging15W33WRealme C51 supports significantly faster charging, reducing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A14 Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution (1080p) leads to a noticeably clearer and more detailed visual experience.
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: Better for video calls and self-portraits.
  • Potentially Slightly Faster CPU: Might offer a slight edge in day-to-day tasks.

Realme C51 Advantages:

  • Smoother Display: 90Hz refresh rate provides a more fluid and responsive user experience.
  • Faster Charging: 33W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • Lighter and Thinner: More comfortable for one-handed use and pocket portability.
  • Potentially Better GPU: Could result in smoother gaming performance.

Trade-offs:

  • Realme C51: Lower resolution display sacrifices sharpness for a faster refresh rate.
  • Samsung Galaxy A14: Slower charging speeds increase downtime. Unspecified refresh rate likely means a standard 60Hz display.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A14: Users who prioritize display clarity and sharpness for media consumption, web browsing, and reading. Suitable for casual users who don't heavily multitask or play demanding games.

Realme C51: Users who value a smooth and responsive user experience, especially for gaming and social media. The faster charging is beneficial for users who need quick top-ups. Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize speed and modern features like a high refresh rate display.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is display sharpness or smoothness more important to you?
  2. How important is fast charging?
  3. What is your budget and what features offer the best value within that range?

My Choice: Realme C51

While the Samsung Galaxy A14 offers a sharper display, the Realme C51's combination of a 90Hz refresh rate, faster charging (33W), and lighter weight makes it a more compelling overall package for me. The smoother user experience and reduced charging time outweigh the lower resolution display in my daily usage. I prioritize fluidity and responsiveness over sheer pixel count, and the faster charging is a significant convenience. Furthermore, the likely similar performance between the two devices makes the Realme C51's modern features like the 90Hz display more appealing. The slightly lower price further reinforces its value proposition.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.