Samsung Galaxy A14 vs Motorola Moto G85 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 27, 2023 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 119.03 cm³ 89.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.28 "/g 3.9 "/g
Weight 201 g 171 g
Height 167.7 mm 161.9 mm
Width 78 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Green
  • Dark Red
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Olive Green
  • Urban Grey
  • Magenta

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 80.2 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42 mAh/cm³ 55.59 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version A Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version A Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A14Motorola Moto G85Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.7 x 78 x 9.1161.9 x 73.1 x 7.6Moto G85 is slightly smaller and noticeably thinner, making it more pocketable.
Weight (g)201171Moto G85 is significantly lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Display TypePLS LCDP-OLEDMoto G85's OLED offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency.
Size (inches)6.66.67Negligible size difference.
Resolution1080 x 24081080 x 2400Virtually identical resolution; sharpness will be similar on both.
Refresh RateNot specified120HzMoto G85's 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations, leading to a more fluid user experience.
Peak BrightnessNot specified1600 nitsMoto G85 should offer significantly better outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80 (12nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6nm)Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 is built on a smaller process node, likely resulting in better performance and power efficiency than the Helio G80.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Moto G85's CPU features faster and more modern cores, translating to noticeably improved performance in demanding tasks and multitasking.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Adreno 619Adreno 619 offers better gaming performance and graphics rendering compared to the Mali-G52 MC2.
RAM4GB12GBMoto G85's significantly larger RAM allows for more apps to run in the background without reloading, leading to smoother multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MP (Sony LYT-600)While both have 50MP sensors, the Moto G85 utilizes a known Sony sensor, potentially indicating better image quality. More details on the A14's sensor are needed for a comprehensive comparison.
Additional CamerasMacro, Depth, SelfieWide Angle, SelfieMoto G85 offers a more versatile wide-angle lens, while A14 includes a dedicated macro lens, the usability of which varies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fpsMoto G85 can record smoother video at 60fps.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacities suggest similar battery life, but real-world usage will depend on other factors like software optimization and display efficiency.
Fast Charging15W30WMoto G85 supports significantly faster charging, reducing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G85 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: OLED with 120Hz refresh rate offers a smoother, more vibrant, and power-efficient visual experience.
  • Significantly Better Performance: More powerful CPU, GPU, and substantially more RAM ensure smoother multitasking and better gaming capabilities.
  • Faster Charging: 30W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Inclusion of a wide-angle lens enhances photographic flexibility.
  • Lighter and Slimmer Design: Improves portability and in-hand comfort.

Samsung Galaxy A14 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Depending on specific configurations and market conditions. (Need more price info for conclusive comparison)

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G85: Suited for users who prioritize performance, a smooth and vibrant display, faster charging, and a versatile camera system. Ideal for gamers, content consumers, and those who value a premium user experience.

Samsung Galaxy A14: Best for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and long battery life. Suitable for light users who primarily use their phones for calling, texting, and social media.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G85 is likely more expensive.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Heavy users will appreciate the Moto G85's performance, while light users might find the A14 sufficient.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize display quality, performance, charging speed, or camera versatility accordingly.

My Choice: Motorola Moto G85

While pricing information is incomplete, the Moto G85 offers a substantial upgrade in almost every aspect for a likely moderate price increase. The superior display, significantly improved performance, faster charging, and more versatile camera system outweigh the potential price difference. The 12GB of RAM ensures future-proofing and a smooth user experience for years to come. The A14, while functional, lacks the performance and features to compete with the overall user experience offered by the Moto G85.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.