Samsung Galaxy A14 vs Motorola Moto G55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 27, 2023 September 6, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 119.03 cm³ 96.6 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.28 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 201 g 179 g
Height 167.7 mm 161.6 mm
Width 78 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Green
  • Dark Red
  • Forest Grey
  • Smoky Green
  • Twilight Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.49 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 80.2 % 85.3 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 118.71 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42 mAh/cm³ 51.76 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version A Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version A Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A14Motorola Moto G55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)167.7 x 78 x 9.1161.6 x 73.8 x 8.1Moto G55 is slightly smaller and thinner, making it potentially more pocketable.
Weight (g)201179Moto G55 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.49Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24081080 x 2400Virtually identical resolution, resulting in similar sharpness.
TypePLS LCDIPS LCDBoth are LCD panels; PLS generally offers slightly better color reproduction and viewing angles than standard IPS, but real-world differences can be subtle.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified120The 120Hz refresh rate on the Moto G55 will provide a significantly smoother and more responsive user experience, especially noticeable in scrolling and gaming.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G80 (12nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm)Dimensity 7025 utilizes a more advanced manufacturing process (6nm vs 12nm), leading to better performance and power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Moto G55 has faster and more powerful CPU cores (Cortex-A78 vs A75), translating to significantly improved performance in demanding tasks and multitasking.
GPUMali-G52 MC2IMG BXM-8-256While specific benchmarks are missing, the IMG BXM-8-256 in the Moto G55 is generally considered more powerful, resulting in smoother gaming and graphics performance.
RAM4GB8GBDouble the RAM on the Moto G55 allows for more efficient multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps open.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP Main, 2MP Macro, 2MP Depth50MP Main, 8MP Wide AngleMoto G55 replaces the dedicated depth sensor with a more useful wide-angle lens, offering greater versatility in photography.
Front Camera13MP16MPMoto G55 boasts a higher resolution front camera, potentially capturing more detailed selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fpsMoto G55 can record videos at 60fps, resulting in smoother footage.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacities suggest similar battery life, although real-world usage will depend on other factors like software optimization and display refresh rate.
Fast Charging15W30WMoto G55 supports significantly faster charging, reducing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Samsung Galaxy A14 Advantages:

  • Potentially slightly better color reproduction: PLS display technology generally offers slightly better colors than standard IPS. However, this can be subjective and dependent on individual panel quality.

Motorola Moto G55 Advantages:

  • Significantly smoother performance: More powerful processor, GPU, and double the RAM contribute to a noticeable difference in speed and responsiveness.
  • Higher refresh rate display: 120Hz refresh rate provides a more fluid and enjoyable user experience.
  • Faster charging: 30W fast charging significantly reduces charging times.
  • More versatile camera system: Wide-angle lens offers more creative possibilities compared to a dedicated depth sensor.
  • More recent OS: Android 14 offers potential performance and feature advantages over Android 13.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A14:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users prioritizing basic smartphone functionality for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and web browsing. Users who are not demanding in terms of performance or gaming.
  • Use Cases: Casual social media usage, light web browsing, basic photography.

Motorola Moto G55:

  • Ideal User: Users seeking a well-rounded smartphone with smooth performance, a good display, and a versatile camera system. Users who engage in more demanding tasks, multitasking, or mobile gaming.
  • Use Cases: Mobile gaming, demanding applications, multitasking, content creation (photography and video), consuming media.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G55 is likely more expensive.
  2. What is your primary use case? For basic tasks, the A14 may suffice. For demanding tasks or gaming, the G55 is strongly recommended.
  3. How important is display quality and smoothness? The G55's 120Hz refresh rate is a major advantage for a more enjoyable user experience.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight budget and basic usage: Samsung Galaxy A14
  • Balanced performance and value: Motorola Moto G55

My Choice: Motorola Moto G55

While the Samsung Galaxy A14 offers a lower price point, the Motorola Moto G55 provides significantly more value due to its superior performance, smoother display, faster charging, more versatile camera, and newer Android version. The difference in user experience would be substantial thanks to the faster processor, doubled RAM, and the 120Hz refresh rate screen. These features contribute significantly to a smoother and more enjoyable daily usage, justifying the likely price difference for most users. Unless budget is extremely tight, the Moto G55 is the clear winner.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.