Samsung Galaxy A14 5G vs Xiaomi Poco C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 12, 2023 November 6, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 119.03 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 202 g 192 g
Height 167.7 mm 168 mm
Width 78 mm 78 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Light Green
  • Dark Red
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 80.2 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1330 (5 nm) - SM-A146B Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146B Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MP2 - SM-A146B Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G and the Xiaomi Poco C65. We'll break down the specs and see how these two budget contenders stack up in the real world.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A14 5GXiaomi Poco C65Real-World Implications
Design
Launch Date2023-01-122023-11-06Poco C65 is a newer model, potentially with more recent software improvements.
Dimensions167.7 × 78 × 9.1 mm168 × 78 × 8.1 mmPoco C65 is slightly thinner, might feel better in hand; A14 5G has a larger overall volume
Weight202g192gPoco C65 is lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size6.6"6.74"Poco C65 has a marginally larger screen, possibly better for media consumption.
Resolution1080x2408720x1600A14 5G's higher resolution will result in sharper text and images.
Pixel Density (PPI)400260A14 5G's higher PPI provides significantly clearer images, and sharper visuals.
TechnologyPLS LCDIPS LCDPoco C65 has slightly better display technology in terms of viewing angles and color accuracy.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth phones have identical peak brightness at 0 nits
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1330 (5 nm)Helio G85 (12 nm)A14 5G's 5nm chip is more efficient, providing better performance and power management.
AnTuTu Score412,200237,768A14 5G has much better overall performance, good for gaming, and multitasking.
GPUMali-G68 MP2Mali-G52 MC2A14 5G’s GPU is superior, providing better graphics performance in games and apps.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth have similar battery capacity, suggesting comparable battery life.
Charging15W18WPoco C65 charges slightly faster.
Battery FeaturesNon-removableReverse charging, Non-removablePoco C65 can act as a power bank to other devices
Camera
Standard Camera50MP f/1.850MP f/1.8Both have similar standard cameras; Poco C65 has a slightly larger sensor size.
Selfie Camera13MP f/2.08MP f/2.2A14 5G has a higher resolution and wider aperture, resulting in better selfies in low-light.
Portrait Lens2MP f/2.42MP f/2.4Similar portrait lens on both devices for depth effects.
Macro Lens2MP f/2.42MP f/2.4Similar macro lens on both devices for capturing close-up images.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth record standard HD videos at 30 frames per second.
Camera FeaturesUltra stable video, Panorama, Night ModeContinuous shooting, RAWA14 5G offers advanced video stabilization and night mode. Poco C65 enables raw image capture and better burst mode.
Software
OSAndroid 13 (upgradable to 14)Android 13A14 5G has potential to be upgraded to a newer version of Android.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11ac802.11acBoth offer similar dual-band Wi-Fi capabilities.
Bluetooth5.2 LE5.3 LEPoco C65 has a newer version of Bluetooth, which could offer better energy efficiency and connection stability.
GPSYesYesBoth offer standard GPS location services.
SIMDual SIMDual SIMBoth support dual SIM cards, suitable for managing two numbers in the same device.
Storage
Internal Storage64/128 GB128/256 GBPoco C65 has more storage options, ideal for users who keep a lot of files, apps, and media.
RAM4/6 GB4/6/8 GBPoco C65 can have more RAM, leading to smoother multitasking, and gaming performance.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone supports expandable storage, limiting space for growing libraries.
Audio
Audio QualityDolby Atmos, Dolby Digital PlusBasic audio featuresA14 5G has more advanced audio features.
Security
Security FeaturesSide FingerprintSide FingerprintBoth have fingerprint sensor for easy unlocking.
Sensors
SensorsAccelerometer, Gyroscope, ProximityAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic proximity virtualA14 5G also has proximity sensor. Poco C65 has a compass, and more advanced proximity sensor.

2. Key Insights

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G:

  • Strengths: Superior display resolution and pixel density for sharper visuals, a more powerful chipset for better overall performance, and a better selfie camera. It also has enhanced audio features and the possibility of a software upgrade.
  • Competitive Advantage: Excels in raw processing power and visual clarity, making it a solid choice for users who value performance and a sharp display experience.
  • Limitations: Slightly thicker and heavier, has limited storage options, and only a 15W charging.

Xiaomi Poco C65:

  • Strengths: Larger display, slightly faster charging, newer Bluetooth version, can act as a powerbank, has more storage options and more RAM options. It also has slightly better display technology.
  • Competitive Advantage: Offers flexibility with RAM, storage and charging capabilities.
  • Limitations: Lower display resolution, lower pixel density, and a less powerful chipset, resulting in inferior overall performance.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G:

  • Best Suited For: Users who prioritize performance, and screen quality for gaming, media consumption, and overall usage.
  • Use Cases: Ideal for everyday tasks, gaming, social media browsing, and anyone who appreciates sharp visuals.

Xiaomi Poco C65:

  • Best Suited For: Users looking for a budget-friendly option with larger storage, and slightly faster charging.
  • Use Cases: Suitable for casual users who need a reliable device for communication, media, and everyday apps. It's also a good option as a backup phone and those on a budget.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Practical Questions to Help You Choose:

  1. Do you prioritize display clarity and overall performance? If yes, the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G is the better choice.
  2. Do you need more storage and slightly faster charging? If yes, the Xiaomi Poco C65 is a better fit.
  3. Are you on a tight budget and only need a basic reliable smartphone? If yes, Xiaomi Poco C65.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • The Gamer/Media Enthusiast: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G for its powerful processor, superior display resolution, and smoother gaming experience.
  • The Casual User on a Budget: Go for the Xiaomi Poco C65 with more storage and slightly faster charging.
  • The Photography Enthusiast: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G as it offers a better selfie experience.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two, I'd lean towards the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G. While the Poco C65 offers some nice advantages like more storage and faster charging, the A14 5G's significantly better display resolution and higher performance chipset makes a noticeable difference in daily usage. I value smooth, crisp visuals and a responsive user experience, which the A14 5G delivers more effectively. The added benefit of better selfie performance, and enhanced audio, makes it more attractive. Despite its higher price, the A14 5G provides a more satisfying overall experience for my specific needs.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.