Samsung Galaxy A14 5G vs Motorola Razr 50 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola

General

Launch Date January 12, 2023 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 119.03 cm³ 92.54 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 202 g 188.4 g
Height 167.7 mm 171.3 mm
Width 78 mm 74 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 7.3 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Light Green
  • Dark Red
  • Koala Grey (Steel Wool)
  • Beach Sand (Pumice Stone)
  • Spritz Orange (Arabesque)

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 80.2 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42 mAh/cm³ 45.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 1330 (5 nm) - SM-A146B Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146B Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G68 MP2 - SM-A146B Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Okay, let's dive into a detailed comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G and the Motorola Razr 50. We're going to go beyond just the numbers and look at what these specs actually mean for your daily life.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here’s a breakdown of the key technical specs, along with what they mean for real-world use:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A14 5GMotorola Razr 50Real-World Implications
Design
Launch Date2023-01-122024-06-25Razr 50 is significantly newer, benefitting from more recent tech.
Form FactorStandardFoldableRazr 50 offers a unique compact design, while A14 is traditional.
Dimensions167.7 x 78 x 9.1mm171.3 x 74 x 7.3mmRazr 50 is taller but thinner, A14 has larger overall volume
Weight202g188.4gRazr 50 is lighter, feels less bulky
Display
Size6.6"6.9"Razr 50's larger screen provides a more immersive viewing experience
Resolution1080x24081080x2640Razr 50 has a slightly sharper screen with more pixels.
Pixel Density400 PPI413 PPIBoth provide very similar sharpness
TechnologyPLS LCD-Both are solid LCD tech for everyday use
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzRazr 50's smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits3000 nitsRazr 50 has massively better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetExynos 1330 (5nm)Dimensity 7300X (4nm)Razr 50 uses a newer, more efficient chip for better speed and battery.
Antutu Score412,200620,395Razr 50 delivers a much faster and smoother experience.
GPUMali-G68 MP2Mali-G615 MC2Razr 50 offers superior graphics performance, especially for gaming.
Camera
Standard Camera50MP, f/1.850MP, f/1.8Both have similar standard camera performance on paper
Selfie Camera13MP, f/2.032MP, f/2.4Razr 50 has a significantly higher-resolution selfie camera, good for photos and videos.
Wide Angle LensNone13MP, f/2.2Razr 50 can capture a wider field of view in photos and videos.
Portrait (Depth)2MP, f/2.4NoneA14 can do depth of field/bokeh effects natively.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4NoneA14 can capture close-up shots.
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@60fpsRazr 50 has much more versatile video capabilities, including higher resolution and frame rate.
StabilisationNoYes with EISRazr 50 gets stabilised video, great for moving shots.
DxoMark ScoreN/A92Razr 50 has been tested for camera quality, A14 hasn't.
Other FeaturesTriple, HDR, Night ModeDual, OIS, RAWRazr 50 gets a wider range of advanced camera features, better for photography enthusiasts.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh4200mAhA14 has a bigger battery and may last longer for some users
Charging15W30WRazr 50 charges much faster
FeaturesNon-removableWireless 15W, Reverse, Non-removableRazr 50 has more battery-related features like wireless and reverse charging
Software
OSAndroid 13 (up to 14)Android 14Razr 50 has the latest OS; A14 has an upgrade.
Connectivity
Wi-Fiac6ERazr 50 gets much faster WiFi
Bluetooth5.25.3Razr 50 has slightly newer Bluetooth
SIMDual NanoDual Nano/eSIMRazr 50 gives more flexibility with eSIM functionality.
Storage
Internal Storage64GB/128GB256GB/512GBRazr 50 has significantly more storage.
RAM4GB/6GB8GB/12GBRazr 50 has better multi-tasking and smooth app switching.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone supports adding more storage.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Dolby Digital PlusDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 3 MicsRazr 50 has better audio playback with stereo speakers and improved audio capture.
Security
Securityside-mounted fingerprint sensorside-mounted fingerprint sensorBoth have similar fingerprint scanner for secure unlock
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass VictusRazr 50 offers a high quality screen protection for more durability.
SensorsBiometric, Proximity, Accelerometer, GyroscopeBiometric, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeRazr 50 has more sensors for more features

2. Key Insights

  • Samsung Galaxy A14 5G: This is an affordable device with a focus on core smartphone functions. It has a large battery and a decent display, making it a solid choice for everyday tasks. However, it lags behind in performance, camera versatility, and screen quality compared to the Razr 50. It's an ideal choice for those who want a standard, reliable phone without breaking the bank.
  • Motorola Razr 50: The Razr 50 is a significant step up, with a foldable design, superior performance, a more advanced camera system, a high refresh rate screen, and faster charging. It comes with more internal storage and RAM, a more robust build, and features such as wireless charging and reverse charging. The Razr 50 is the choice for people who want premium features, including a unique design, and are willing to pay for it.

Trade-offs: The Samsung A14 has the edge in battery size, likely giving it better battery endurance. However, the Razr 50’s battery still manages to offer a very compelling package while also offering fast charging, wireless charging, and reverse charging on top.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Samsung Galaxy A14 5G:
    • User Profile: Budget-conscious users, students, or those who need a reliable device for basic smartphone usage.
    • Use Case: Web browsing, social media, calls, and casual media consumption.
  • Motorola Razr 50:
    • User Profile: Tech enthusiasts, professionals, or anyone seeking a high-performance smartphone with advanced features and a unique design.
    • Use Case: Multitasking, gaming, photography, content creation, and immersive multimedia consumption.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three practical questions to help you decide:

  1. What's your budget? The A14 5G is likely to be significantly more affordable than the Razr 50. If budget is your biggest constraint, the A14 will probably be the choice.
  2. How important is performance and features to you? If you need a device for demanding tasks, the Razr 50’s faster processor and more RAM, coupled with its wide array of features, are worth it.
  3. How much do you value a unique form factor? If you want the pocketability and novelty of a foldable phone and you don't mind paying extra, then the Razr 50 is the only option here.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: The Budget Conscious: If you are on a tight budget and need a basic, functional phone, the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G will get the job done.
  • Scenario 2: The Performance Seeker: If you prioritize performance, superior display quality, and an advanced camera, the Motorola Razr 50 is a much better option.
  • Scenario 3: The Tech Enthusiast: If you’re looking for cutting-edge features, a unique foldable design, and don’t mind spending a bit extra, the Motorola Razr 50 is the clear winner.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two, I would personally go with the Motorola Razr 50. While the price difference is definitely something to consider, the Razr 50 offers a far more compelling package overall.

Here’s why:

  • Superior Performance: The Dimensity 7300X chipset and ample RAM will make a significant difference in my day-to-day use, providing a smoother experience with faster app loading and multitasking.
  • Better Display: I appreciate the larger size and higher refresh rate, making media consumption and daily navigation much more enjoyable. The substantially higher peak brightness is very important to me.
  • Advanced Camera: As someone who enjoys taking photos and videos, the wide-angle lens, 4K recording, and advanced stabilisation are big plus points.
  • Unique Form Factor: I am always on the lookout for new and innovative tech. A foldable phone is something I would personally get more value from.
  • Future Proofing: The newer OS, better Wi-Fi, wireless charging, and larger storage make the Razr 50 a more future-proof purchase.

Ultimately, the Motorola Razr 50 provides a premium smartphone experience with a unique foldable design, making it a more appealing choice for tech enthusiasts and power users like myself.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.