Samsung Galaxy A13 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 23, 2022 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 111 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 195 g 189 g
Height 165.1 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.4 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.2 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.05 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 850 (8 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A13 vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones through the lens of user experience, going beyond raw specs to paint a picture of how each device feels in your hand and fits into your life.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A13ZTE Blade A75 4GUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignOne UI Core 4.1 (Android 12)Stock Android 13Samsung offers a more customized interface, potentially with more features but a steeper learning curve.
Display6.6" PLS LCD (400ppi)6.6" IPS LCD (267ppi)A13 boasts a sharper, more detailed display, enhancing visual clarity for media consumption.
Interaction FlowSamsung's established UIStock Android experienceFamiliarity with Samsung or pure Android will influence preference.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard AndroidStandard AndroidBoth rely on Android's built-in accessibility features.
Design Ergonomics195g189gZTE is slightly lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for note-taking in a lecture. The A13's sharper display ensures clear visibility of presentations and documents, even from a distance. The ZTE Blade A75 4G, while having a lower resolution, offers a smoother 90Hz refresh rate, making scrolling through notes and web pages feel more fluid.

Scenario: A photographer needs to quickly capture a moment. Both phones offer a 50MP main camera, but the A13 includes additional lenses for versatility, while the ZTE focuses on simplicity with its dual-camera setup.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both phones provide a reasonably accessible experience thanks to Android's features. However, the simpler interface of the ZTE Blade A75 4G might be easier for less tech-savvy users. The A13's higher price point might be a barrier for some, while the ZTE offers a more budget-friendly option without significantly compromising core functionality.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

For the visually driven user: The A13's superior display makes it a clear winner for media consumption and detailed tasks.

For the budget-conscious user prioritizing smooth performance: The ZTE Blade A75 4G offers a compelling balance of features and affordability, especially with its 90Hz display.

For the user seeking simplicity: The ZTE's cleaner Android interface provides a straightforward experience.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A13

While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers excellent value, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A13. The deciding factor for me is the significantly better display. As a visual learner, I prioritize screen clarity and sharpness. The slightly higher price is justifiable for the enhanced visual experience, especially for activities like reading, watching videos, and browsing photos. The A13's versatile camera system also appeals to my creative side. While I appreciate the ZTE's simplicity and smoother refresh rate, the A13's crisp display ultimately aligns better with my personal needs and preferences.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.