Samsung Galaxy A13 vs Xiaomi Poco C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 23, 2022 November 6, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 111 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 195 g 192 g
Height 165.1 mm 168 mm
Width 76.4 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.2 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.05 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 850 (8 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A13 vs. Xiaomi Poco C65: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the raw numbers. Let's delve into a narrative-driven analysis, focusing on how design choices translate into real-world user experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A13Xiaomi Poco C65User Experience Impact
Display6.6" PLS LCD (400 ppi)6.74" IPS LCD (260 ppi, 90Hz)The Poco C65 boasts a larger, smoother display thanks to its 90Hz refresh rate, despite lower pixel density. A13 offers sharper visuals.
OS & UpdatesAndroid 12 (up to 13)Android 13Poco C65 ships with a newer Android version, potentially offering more features and longer software support out-of-the-box.
PerformanceExynos 850 (8nm)Helio G85 (12nm)Both offer comparable performance for everyday tasks, but the Helio G85 might handle demanding games slightly better.
Camera50MP Main50MP MainSimilar main camera resolution suggests comparable image quality. Poco C65's additional camera software features might offer an edge.
Battery5000mAh5000mAhBoth have identical battery capacities, promising all-day usage.
Design Ergonomics195g192gNegligible weight difference; both phones should feel comfortable in hand. Poco C65 is slightly thinner.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a student using your phone for note-taking, social media, and casual gaming.

  • A13: Offers a crisper display for reading articles and viewing detailed images. The slightly older Android version might mean missing out on some newer features.
  • Poco C65: The smoother 90Hz display provides a more fluid experience while scrolling through social media and playing games. The larger screen enhances media consumption.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For visually impaired users: The A13's sharper screen might be preferable for reading text. Both phones offer standard accessibility features built into Android.
  • For budget-conscious users: The Poco C65 generally falls into a lower price bracket, offering great value for its features.
  • For users prioritizing software updates: The Poco C65's newer Android version suggests longer-term support.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The choice hinges on your priorities:

  • Prioritize visual clarity and sharpness: Choose the Galaxy A13.
  • Prioritize smooth scrolling, larger display, and latest software: Choose the Poco C65.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco C65

While the A13 offers a sharper display, I value the smoother user experience provided by the Poco C65's 90Hz refresh rate and the more up-to-date Android version. The slightly larger screen also enhances media consumption. As a user who values fluid interactions and a modern software experience, the Poco C65 aligns better with my needs. The lower price point makes it a compelling choice without significant compromises on essential features. Furthermore, the added camera software features on the Poco C65 hint at a more versatile photography experience.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.