Samsung Galaxy A13 vs Nokia X30 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia X30
Nokia X30
Nokia

General

Launch Date March 23, 2022 September 21, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 111 cm³ 93.94 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 195 g 185 g
Height 165.1 mm 158.9 mm
Width 76.4 mm 73.9 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach
  • Cloudy Blue
  • Ice White

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.43 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.2 % 85 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 409 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 700 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 101.58 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.05 mAh/cm³ 44.71 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 850 (8 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
GPU Mali-G52 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 13 13

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A13 vs. Nokia X30: A Tale of Two Experiences

As a technology communications specialist, my goal isn't just to compare specs, but to paint a picture of how these devices feel in your hand and how they fit into your life. Let's delve into the Samsung Galaxy A13 and the Nokia X30, not as lists of numbers, but as two distinct narratives of mobile interaction.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A13Nokia X30User Experience Impact
Interface DesignPLS LCDAMOLEDThe Nokia X30's AMOLED screen offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency, leading to a more vibrant visual experience.
Interaction FlowStandard Android 12Standard Android 12Both offer a familiar Android experience, but the Nokia X30's 90Hz refresh rate provides smoother animations and scrolling.
Accessibility FeaturesBasicBasicBoth devices offer standard Android accessibility features, but neither stands out with unique inclusive design elements.
Design ErgonomicsPlastic Body, LargerSlimmer, Lighter DesignThe Nokia X30 feels more premium and comfortable for extended use due to its slimmer profile and lighter weight.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Imagine you're a photography enthusiast on a weekend trip.

  • Galaxy A13: You appreciate the versatile quad-camera system, capturing wide landscapes and detailed close-ups. However, the lack of optical image stabilization might result in blurry photos in low light or when your hand shakes. The large battery ensures you can capture memories all day long.

  • Nokia X30: You capture stunning photos with the 50MP camera, enhanced by optical image stabilization for crisp, clear shots even in challenging conditions. The AMOLED screen brings your photos to life with vibrant colors and deep blacks. However, the smaller battery might require you to be mindful of power consumption throughout the day.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

Both phones cater to a general audience with standard Android features. However, users with visual impairments might find the Nokia X30's AMOLED screen with higher contrast more accessible. Users who prioritize single-hand usability might prefer the Nokia X30's more compact design.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Choosing the right phone depends on your priorities:

  • Prioritize Battery Life and Affordability: The Samsung Galaxy A13 excels with its massive 5000mAh battery and lower price point.
  • Prioritize Display Quality, Performance, and Design: The Nokia X30 offers a superior visual experience, smoother performance with its 90Hz AMOLED display and more powerful processor, and a more premium design.

My Choice: The Nokia X30

While the Galaxy A13 offers impressive battery life and affordability, I would choose the Nokia X30. The superior AMOLED display, enhanced by the 90Hz refresh rate, creates a significantly more engaging and enjoyable user experience. The slimmer design and lighter weight contribute to a more comfortable feel in hand. The improved camera with OIS is crucial for capturing high-quality photos and videos. While the battery is smaller, I prioritize the overall user experience and the feeling of quality that the Nokia X30 provides. For me, the daily delight of interacting with a beautiful and responsive device outweighs the need for an extra-large battery. The Nokia X30 feels like a more thoughtful, well-rounded device that prioritizes the quality of the user experience.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.