Samsung Galaxy A13 vs Nokia C32 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C32
Nokia C32
Nokia

General

Launch Date March 23, 2022 February 25, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 111 cm³ 107.44 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.26 "/g
Weight 195 g 199.4 g
Height 165.1 mm 164.6 mm
Width 76.4 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach
  • Charcoal
  • Autumn Green
  • Beach Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.2 % 81.6 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.05 mAh/cm³ 46.54 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Exynos 850 (8 nm) Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 IMG8322

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A13 vs. Nokia C32: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the numbers. Let's delve into the user experience offered by the Samsung Galaxy A13 and Nokia C32.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A13Nokia C32User Experience Impact
Interface DesignOne UI Core 4.1Stock Android 13One UI offers more customization options but Stock Android provides a cleaner, potentially faster experience.
Interaction FlowSmooth, responsiveGenerally smoothA13's more powerful processor likely results in smoother multitasking and app loading.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard AndroidStandard AndroidBoth offer basic Android accessibility features.
Design ErgonomicsComfortable gripComfortable gripSimilar dimensions and weight contribute to comfortable handling in both devices.
Display6.6" FHD+ PLS LCD6.5" HD+ IPS LCDA13's sharper display provides a more visually engaging experience for media consumption and gaming.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a student using your phone for online classes, social media, and casual gaming.

  • Galaxy A13: The sharper, full HD display brings lectures to life and makes gaming more immersive. The faster processor ensures smooth transitions between apps and minimal lag during video calls.
  • Nokia C32: The HD+ display is adequate for everyday tasks, but might feel less immersive for media. The processor, while capable, might show occasional slowdowns with demanding apps or multitasking. The cleaner Android experience might be preferred by users who value simplicity and potential for longer software updates.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For budget-conscious users: The Nokia C32 offers a compelling value proposition with its long battery life and clean Android experience.
  • For students or media consumers: The Galaxy A13's superior display and performance make it better suited for multimedia and multitasking.
  • For seniors: Both phones offer large screens and simple interfaces, but the stock Android on the Nokia C32 might be easier to learn.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Samsung Galaxy A13 prioritizes performance and visual clarity with its FHD+ display and faster processor. The Nokia C32 focuses on affordability and a clean software experience with stock Android. Beyond raw specs, consider how you'll primarily use your phone.

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A13. While the Nokia C32 offers excellent value, the A13's superior display and smoother performance significantly enhance the user experience, especially for activities I prioritize: consuming media, light gaming, and multitasking. The sharper resolution and better processor future-proof the device for longer, ensuring a consistently enjoyable user experience. While I appreciate the clean interface of stock Android, the performance difference combined with the display quality outweighs the software experience in this comparison for my personal needs.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.