Samsung Galaxy A13 vs Motorola Moto G85 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 23, 2022 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 111 cm³ 89.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.9 "/g
Weight 195 g 171 g
Height 165.1 mm 161.9 mm
Width 76.4 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Olive Green
  • Urban Grey
  • Magenta

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.2 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.05 mAh/cm³ 55.59 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 850 (8 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Samsung Galaxy A13 vs. Motorola Moto G85: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones not just as lists of specs, but as tools that fit into your life. Let's delve into a comparative analysis of the Samsung Galaxy A13 and the Motorola Moto G85, focusing on the user experience.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A13Motorola Moto G85User Experience Impact
Interface DesignPLS LCD, 400 ppiP-OLED, 395 ppi, 120Hz refresh rateMoto G85 offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling.
Interaction FlowAndroid 12 (upgradable to 13)Android 14Moto G85 benefits from newer OS features and potential longer support.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibilityStandard Android accessibilityBoth offer basic accessibility features; further investigation needed.
Design Ergonomics195g, 8.8mm thick171g, 7.6mm thickMoto G85 is lighter and thinner, potentially more comfortable to hold.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're a student taking notes in a fast-paced lecture. The Moto G85's 120Hz refresh rate ensures smoother scrolling and note-taking, reducing eye strain and making it easier to keep up. Its brighter 1600 nits peak brightness display also means you can clearly see your notes even outdoors in bright sunlight.

On the other hand, the Galaxy A13's larger 5000mAh battery could be a lifesaver for long days on campus without access to a charger. Its robust 4G LTE connectivity ensures reliable internet access even in areas with weaker signals.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

User 1: A Senior Citizen: The Moto G85's lighter weight might be easier for users with limited hand strength. However, both phones offer large screens beneficial for readability.

User 2: A Budget-Conscious Student: The Galaxy A13, often available at a lower price point, provides excellent value with its long-lasting battery and reliable performance.

User 3: A Creative Professional: The Moto G85's superior display and newer Android version might be more appealing for tasks requiring visual accuracy and the latest software features.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Moto G85 prioritizes a premium visual and interactive experience with its OLED display, higher refresh rate, and newer OS. The Galaxy A13 focuses on practicality and affordability, emphasizing battery life and connectivity.

My Choice: Motorola Moto G85

While the Galaxy A13 offers excellent value, the Moto G85's superior display and performance, combined with its sleeker design and newer Android version, create a more compelling overall user experience. The smoother scrolling, vibrant colors, and faster processor of the Moto G85 would significantly enhance my daily interactions, making tasks more enjoyable and efficient. While the price difference is a factor, the long-term benefits of a more fluid and engaging user experience outweigh the initial cost for me. Furthermore, the longer software support lifespan offered by a newer Android version ensures a more future-proof investment.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.