Samsung Galaxy A13 vs Motorola Moto G04s - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 23, 2022 April 29, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 111 cm³ 97.45 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.38 "/g 3.67 "/g
Weight 195 g 178.8 g
Height 165.1 mm 163.5 mm
Width 76.4 mm 74.5 mm
Thickness 8.8 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach
  • Sunrise Orange
  • Sea Green
  • Concord Black
  • Satin Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.56 "
Resolution 1080 x 2408 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.2 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 400 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 116.19 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.05 mAh/cm³ 51.31 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Exynos 850 (8 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Samsung Galaxy A13 and the Motorola Moto G04s. Instead of getting bogged down in a spec sheet showdown, we'll explore how these devices translate technical capabilities into real-world experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureSamsung Galaxy A13Motorola Moto G04sUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignOne UI Core 4.1My UXBoth offer clean interfaces. One UI Core might have more features, while My UX leans towards a near-stock Android experience.
Interaction FlowStandard AndroidStock Android-likeMoto G04s potentially offers a smoother, more responsive experience due to less bloatware and potentially quicker software updates.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard AndroidStandard AndroidBoth rely on standard Android accessibility features.
Design ErgonomicsPlastic build, largerSlimmer, lighterMoto G04s might feel more premium and comfortable for extended use due to its sleeker profile and lighter weight.
Display6.6" PLS LCD 400ppi6.56" IPS LCD 90Hz 269ppiA13 boasts a sharper display due to higher pixel density, while G04s provides smoother visuals thanks to the 90Hz refresh rate. The A13's larger size might be preferable for media consumption, while the G04s's smoother refresh rate enhances everyday interactions.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for note-taking in class. The A13's sharper screen makes reading detailed lecture slides easier. However, the G04s's 90Hz refresh rate makes scrolling through documents and web pages feel more fluid and responsive, reducing eye strain during long study sessions.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

User 1: A senior citizen: The A13's larger display with higher pixel density could be beneficial for readability. However, the G04s's lighter weight and stock Android experience might be easier to learn and navigate.

User 2: A young professional: The G04s's sleeker design and smoother performance could be appealing. But, the A13's sharper screen might be preferred for tasks involving detail, like editing documents or viewing intricate designs.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The choice between these devices hinges on individual priorities. If a sharper display for media consumption and detailed work is paramount, the A13 edges ahead. However, if a smoother, more responsive user experience for everyday tasks is preferred, the G04s is the better option. The G04s also benefits from a more modern OS and potentially longer software support due to its newer release date.

My Choice:

As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Motorola Moto G04s. While the A13 offers a sharper display, the G04s's 90Hz refresh rate, slimmer design, lighter weight, near-stock Android experience, and newer release year (meaning more up-to-date software and potentially longer support) contribute to a significantly more enjoyable and responsive user experience. For me, the fluidity and ease of use, combined with the modern OS, outweigh the benefits of a slightly sharper screen. The subtle difference in sharpness won't impact my daily use as much as the consistently smoother interactions provided by the 90Hz display. Furthermore, the more up-to-date Android version on the G04s aligns with my preference for the latest features and enhanced security. In the long run, the G04s promises a more future-proof experience.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.